Watch
Scream 4

Scream 4

2011
Comedy
Suspense/Thriller
1h 51m
Perennial survivor Sidney Prescott, now a successful self-help author, returns to her home town of Woodsboro in the fourth act of director Wes Craven's Scream franchise. Sidney's homecoming, however, coincides with a slew of unsettling new murders.
Your probable score
?

Scream 4

2011
Comedy
Suspense/Thriller
1h 51m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 34.33% from 1963 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(1963)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 16 May 2011
85
64th
Easily the best one since the first, the opening scenes were fantastic.
Rated 13 Nov 2021
77
47th
Absolutely better than the two sequels, no doubts. I see also a slightly improvement in the Craven's direction and the final cliffhanger was really unexpected. Not a masterpiece, but I liked it quite a lot
Rated 07 Sep 2011
74
77th
it's dumb, I know, but teen slashers are my guilty fruit
Rated 24 Apr 2011
55
6th
Having missed the first three films, I am certainly missing a lot of this story. Standing as a film on its own, though, it's not all terrible. The shining aspect of this film is the meta humour, which it pulls off very well. Playing with damn near every horror movie cliche in the last 50 years, Scream 4 succeeds in keeping the audience entertained with a semi-satisfying mix of humour and horror (although I use horror very loosely - there are few scares outside jumps at the camera).
Rated 27 Sep 2011
90
75th
Scream 4 came with the proposal to start a new trilogy. It would be a good idea in modern times, with such evolution of the genre. But Wes did not bet on innovation, but also utilize the same methods as in the past decade. Relying more on famous little faces in the plot. The killings, which were before the differential of the film, this was quick and mismanagement. Black humor once again fell to comedy. We can compare Scream 4 with a subsequent bad remake. Unfortunately!
Rated 24 Feb 2019
40
39th
Not just horrors in general, but even the particular subgenre alone produced a lot of conceptually new, unconventional and imaginative movies over the period from 1996 to 2011. Every single one of them, to all appearances, passed Wes Craven by. To the end of his days, he had been staying in a post-modernistic dump spawned by himself with the first installment of the franchise, his final contribution to the field of slashers. Yet, hey, most people never make even one gem in their whole life.
Rated 24 May 2012
80
61st
For fans, it was a great entry in the series. For newcomers to the franchise its a solid film that certainly surpasses the mediocrity that the horror genre has become.
Rated 22 Oct 2020
3
15th
All the trappings of Scream, except cynical and uninspired and with this weird soft-focus filter.
Rated 13 Feb 2012
2
4th
Meta-meta-meta.
Rated 20 Jul 2018
92
76th
I still am shocked, every week, that Wes Craven is dead. It is hard to overstate how influential he was to me, and how full of life and energy his films are, and how sad it is that he's gone.
Rated 11 Nov 2011
58
28th
The opening was pretty cute and all the original leads (who are still alive) are back... and old. So of course, there are a bunch of dumb teens too. Fast paced and enjoyable for the most part, but stupid ending.
Rated 03 Aug 2011
58
43rd
I could watch the last scene in the house and the hospital scene over and over, but beyond that, I'm good.
Rated 10 Jul 2012
18
12th
I love the Scream movies but I will pretend that it ended with a trilogy.
Rated 19 Oct 2020
26
6th
How can a slasher be so boring??
Rated 09 Dec 2011
15
5th
Scream 4 Ice Cream instead
Rated 12 Oct 2012
50
4th
#%#&*#(*#(#)

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...