Storie di ordinaria follia

Storie di ordinaria follia

1981
Drama
1h 41m
Half soused, with a 2 a.m. shadow and street urchin rags, Serking waltzes through the scummiest neighborhoods of the City of Angels, soaking up booze, poetry, and copulation, and lounging in flophouses and on grimy public buses. His bedmates are a midget, a string of seedy whores, and various earthy L.A. denizens... (AllMovieGuide)
Your probable score
?

Storie di ordinaria follia

1981
Drama
1h 41m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 45.93% from 88 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(88)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 10 Jul 2011
56
12th
I don't care much for Bukowski. All that romanticizing of depravity just seems like an attempt to excuse his misogyny, laziness, alcoholism, cruelty and vulgarity. Ferreri doesn't bring anything very interesting to the material, and basically leaves Gazzara to stumble around and wax poetic about death, souls, and dying souls. There's some hilariously bad lines that I assume come from the author himself. Gazzara is very good, though, except his boyish face has a tendency to look too smug.
Rated 30 Oct 2013
84
77th
Ben Gazzara recites and plays Bukowski -- that is enough to make me like this film, and he does an excellent job portraying the main man, replicating his characteristics very closely. This is a collection of Bukowski's short stories rendered through a feature-length narrative, and it feels very true to the author's mood and style. Not all of the stories are as good as each other, but if you're a fan of Buk you're bound to be a fan of this film.
Rated 12 Jan 2010
70
40th
It's a shame this isn't better than it is, because Ben Gazzara is an excellent actor who looks like and portrays Bukowski better than any other actor to have done so. Unfortunately the film is kind of a meandering mess that even Bukowski was apparently unimpressed with.
Rated 06 Jun 2022
47
12th
The plot has no dept and the acting is quite bad. Ornella is the best that this movie can offer, but she has better movies.
Rated 19 Feb 2024
65
51st
Gazzara is, I suppose, a better Buk than Dillon or Rourke, although Rourke was better at being a waster by far. This is a curiously interesting film that has bits that feel out of place with the subject matter (Ornella Muti, what the fuck?). More sleazy shenanigans would've been excellent, but it's still a good film.
Rated 11 Aug 2008
60
42nd
Interesting Bukowski adaptation. Gazzara is great, and Ornella Muta is gorgeous as always.
Rated 05 Jan 2014
20
8th
A meandering story of a low life booze hound poet getting drunk and chasing women. There are many bizarre scenes and some nudity. The blonde was ugly and ridiculous. The whore was an especially unconvincing role, but she had a cute butt. He is basically a degenerate and a drunk. His poetry is nonsensical and uninteresting. The story is pointless and hollow. I was tired of the voice over as soon as it started, and I never saw the charm they so tried to display in him. Barely worth watching.
Rated 09 Apr 2017
73
80th
The best Bukowski film I know, because it gets his tone right and doesn't boast with the depravity. It rather strings together pointless incidents of boozing, stumbling, fucking, and self-harm, all under the cruel light of a sad, wind-blown Los Angeles. Especially the contrast with the sickening offices of the publishing company show that Bukowski's drunken life must have felt both hellish and heavenly to him. It was his art, his only refuge.

Collections

(6)
Compact view

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...