Watch
The Incredible Hulk

The Incredible Hulk

2008
Sci-fi, Fantasy
1h 52m
Depicting the events after the Gamma Bomb. 'The Incredible Hulk' tells the story of Dr Bruce Banner, who seeks a cure to his unique condition, which causes him to turn into a giant green monster under emotional stress. Whilst on the run from military which seeks his capture, Banner comes close to a cure. But all is lost when a new creature emerges; The Abomination. (imdb)
Your probable score
?

The Incredible Hulk

2008
Sci-fi, Fantasy
1h 52m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 36.09% from 7672 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(7672)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 10 Mar 2016
85
63rd
Resoundingly adequate, but will be remembered only by those who do complete MCU marathons.
Rated 24 Jun 2008
6
55th
All I remember about this movie was a really hot chick let me finger her in the theater when we went to watch this. Good times
Rated 17 Jun 2008
72
61st
Pretty decent, and certainly better than the Ang Lee version. Norton makes a good Banner, and they get right down to it in this version. Origin story is conveniently sidestepped, so we don't waste time with that. To be honest, most of the movie is filler between action scenes, but that's ok, cause the action scenes are really fucking good. None of this naked hulk vs. hulkdogs bullshit. We get the Hulk fucking shit up, and a great finale fight of Hulk vs Abomination that is sure to satisfy.
Rated 24 Feb 2011
45
17th
If this is supposed to be the good movie, I don't want to waste any more of my time on The Hulk. I understand why they chose to gloss over the origin story, but this creates a huge lack in character development that the movie never compensates for. None of the characters' motivations ever feel convincing; especially Roth, who ONLY exists so The Hulk can have something his own size to fight. On top of that, the CGI is too much and the fight scenes are cliched. A big step back for superhero flicks
Rated 02 Aug 2008
90
86th
They should bury the first hulk movie and never speak of it again.
Rated 11 Jan 2009
90
94th
If Marvel keep putting out films of this calibre it's going to be a very good couple of years. This is basically the best Hulk film I could have hoped for, and the fact that it's the start of tying the universe together makes it even better. Can't wait to see what's next!
Rated 04 Mar 2010
50
7th
So why make another Hulk movie 5 years later? Seemingly only for a dumb teaser at the end that I think even Hollywood is smart enough to reconsider. At least Ang Lee tried to inject some serious pathos into the Hulk. Sure, that's one of the stupidest ideas I've ever heard, and he didn't prove otherwise, but at least there was some reason to watch it. This is throwaway plot with a CG model wreaking havoc on other CG models.
Rated 17 Sep 2016
17
1st
Gloomy, stilted, and sappy. The two Tims try to inject some charisma but Liv Tyler is perpetually stuck in la-la land and Ed Noodle is about as exciting as the cold center of a microwavable burrito.
Rated 14 Jan 2010
75
50th
A satisfying comic book film that does the source material justice.
Rated 01 Oct 2012
75
53rd
Not bad, but ultimately disappointing. Ed Norton makes a good Banner, Tim Roth is a solid bad guy, and there's some good action scenes, but it just doesn't add up to much. A fun popcorn movie, but nothing to write home about really.
Rated 17 Jun 2008
70
34th
Norton makes a better Hulk than I had thought, but the horrible acting of Liv Tyler more than makes up for it. William Hurt proceeds to call everyone by the name "Soldier" and does an awful job in his character. Almost no plot or character development, but some well done CGI. Overall, this movie stumbles too much to make a good impression.
Rated 27 Dec 2008
2
8th
A crashing disappointment coming so soon on the heels of the excellent IRON MAN. Actually worse than Ang Lee's version -- impossible to follow, under-written to the point of inanity. Even the action is lousy. Leterrier is incapable of telling a coherent story. I could feel myself getting angrier as the thing dragged on. The Hulk should be the easiest Marvel character to film, yet NO ONE can seem to get it right. Hulk SMASH stupid turkey movie!
Rated 01 Aug 2009
69
65th
Enjoyable comic book action. The plot is nothing special, but at least it stays simple and avoids plot holes. Norton and Roth are excellent and the rest of cast adequate at best. Good fun.
Rated 11 Feb 2010
60
30th
Completely silly reboot of the Hulk franchise. Edward Norton is miscast as Bruce Banner. The effects are "ok" up to a point but instead of emphasizing the human drama elements of the Hulk it dives right into action sequences that look like they come from a video game. Not all that impressive considering the vaunted "reboot" status and dramatically a lesser film than Ang Lee's version.
Rated 23 Dec 2012
52
47th
I loved Edward Norton's scenes of isolation, tormented by his inner demon. And Tim Roth's ambitious, aging general started out as an interesting antagonist. And then... we get to the states, Roth turns into a caricature, and the interesting, introspective plot turns into a pretty boring action sequence. Norton was enjoyable, and the effects, though not great, were decent. But it felt like a waste of potential, and more of a vehicle for Marvel than anything else.
Rated 22 Aug 2013
2
15th
I have never been as happy about a power outage as I was when I saw this in theatres.
Rated 04 Jul 2009
67
37th
As an action movie it mostly works, but dramatically it is a mixed and forgettable experience. The action is cool, but its storyline is fairly unremarkable and ho-hum.
Rated 07 Jul 2008
33
6th
By far the worst comic-book based film I've seen, more in the league with Mortal Kombat II then anything else. The only plus is a short guest appearance of Robert Downey Jr. (you guessed it - Tony Stark!).
Rated 13 Apr 2010
40
15th
the plot "superhero meets his equal" has been done to death, and the story pretty much doesn't have anything else. The motivation for the villain is weak, Hurt and Tyler (who sucked by the way) portray one dimensional characters. Norton can't quite save a film when he has very little presence. Top-notch actions scenes make the movie tolerable though.
Rated 10 Feb 2015
30
8th
The use of Liv Tyler's character is alarmingly sexist (she is practically the only female in the film and exists ONLY to lend support to Edward Norton's character), and honestly, apart from a couple of decent sequences towards the beginning, everything else is a mess.
Rated 23 Jul 2008
28
9th
The creators veer so far from the unfairly maligned 2003 Ang Lee take on the Hulk that they wind up with a film that doesn't have a brain in its big green head. It takes flailing stabs at the different subtexts inherent to the ballooning angry fellow and his band of grouchy or teary supporting characters, but it's half-hearted. In the end, this film is about finding a way for the Hulk use a couple of parked cars as makeshift boxing gloves because that'll look way cool in the video game spin-off.
Rated 08 Sep 2018
80
63rd
This updated version of Hulk had a lot to like but I was pulled away by Norton and Tyler. My issue with Norton as Bruce Banner is that he isn't someone that I feel sorry for. Norton has one of those faces that you just need to hate. Tyler, like Norton, is a fantastic actor but I think their talents were wasted in this movie. I like that this movie doesn't feel the need to rehash the origin story. It is a story of Banner coming to terms with his affliction. The story is great in this movie.
Rated 26 Apr 2019
85
75th
The first half does a fantastic job of doing what may be most important: making Banner compelling enough that you're not sitting around waiting for the Hulk. The writer shrewdly offers up what he wants most: a potential cure. Once the Hulk does show up it's an impressively well made battle, although after having seen so many Avengers movies since 2008, they don't seem as impressive as they once did. Still, although we don't get much characterization for Betty or Emil, the performances are solid
Rated 12 Mar 2021
5
43rd
What many consider to be the black sheep of the MCU, The Incredible Hulk does feel the most out of place of them, wether because Universal produced this or the one off Norton experiment, I find this is actually okay. Roth was actually really intriguing to me, and his build up to Abomination was interesting. A lot of the action and effects were solid as well, and it binds a entertaining final act. However, Norton and Tyler themselves leave a lot to he desired. It's incredibly average.
Rated 25 Jul 2010
62
36th
The screenplay has flaws and the effects are questionables, but is passable for Edward Norton's intense performance
Rated 20 Sep 2008
71
29th
Fun enough and Norton does a good job, but there's something about the story that just wasn't all that captivating.
Rated 27 Apr 2013
68
45th
I just can't get into these Hulk films. If you're a big fan of the Hulk comics, the movies just can't compete. The best Hulk incarnation is actually the one in the Avengers.
Rated 06 Oct 2008
35
18th
The gratuitous Stark/Iron Man tie-ins define this one: a vehicle for the evolving Marvel movie universe. They decided to make Banner more of a Jason Bourne clone than a scientist, and having him start to be able to control the Hulk's powers takes away the emotion behind his quest to cure himself. Norton and Tyler are decent, but William Hurt as Gen. Ross is completely one-dimensional and uninteresting compared to Sam Elliott's version in the 2003 film.
Rated 23 Jun 2008
99
96th
Edward Norton and Liv Tyler, William Hurt and Tim Roth all OWNED their roles! Even the big ol' green meanie himself looked PERFECT! I saw The Incredible Hulk today and I am VERY excited to tell you how much I loved it! It's a HUGE improvement over Ang Lee's version from just over 5 years ago, and I cannot recommend it enough! I am going to have my detractors when I say this, but I liked Hulk better than... GASP... Iron Man!
Rated 22 Sep 2010
66
51st
OK adaption and I liked it better than the Ang Lee version. It was really just a set up for the Avengers (that Norton won't even be in because of his incessant bitching) so I wasn't expecting too much.
Rated 23 Jun 2009
70
29th
The action was fun, but everything else was just boring. I thought first attempt was a better movie.
Rated 06 Jul 2008
67
6th
The Incredible Hulk is a weak summer blockbuster, and a shell of its former Marvel counterpart Iron Man. Driven by a horrible script. Director, Louis Leterrier has to muster nearly a two hour cinematic adventure guided by virtually a non-existent plot and dialogue. Nonetheless, Norton and Laterrier manage to keep the audience engaged, despite Liv Tyler's disgraceful performance as Betty Ross. The action is entertaining yet unfulfilling. TIH although not an Abomination leaves much to be desired.
Rated 27 Jul 2009
73
54th
Not the best of comicbook superhero movies, but hey, it has Tim Roth.
Rated 20 Jun 2009
27
7th
Perhaps it's that the hulk as a character is just dumb, maybe its the sterile acting and bland special effects. I don't know - all I know is that this is pretty bad.
Rated 30 Mar 2014
47
21st
Picture it: the scriptwriters have written the first half-hour or so, they've been informed that their job is done and the CGI guys will take it from here, when the boss comes in and goes "Um, guys? We kind of need a big finish, any ideas?" One scriptwriter takes his mouth off the bong long enough to mumble "Um... another hulk?" Boss shrugs and goes with it. As does the audience.
Rated 21 Feb 2011
60
40th
Okay, 5 years later and still no decent story or improvements.for everything that's better, there something that's worse, so it's pretty much on par. Norton is decent as always, tyler makes for a pretty betty ross but is nowhere near jennifer connelly. Mmmmh, jennifer connelly...
Rated 24 Sep 2008
71
53rd
Far more entertaining, and thus enjoyable, than Ang Lee's Hulk film but it's not without it's flaws. I think the largest one is that the character of The Hulk simply isn't an interesting one. The other being the supporting characters are even worse. Still, as a blockbuster action flick where you're going to see stuff explode this delivers. It's good great fights and a great a cast, who do what they can with what they're given. In the end it's entertaining but nothing more.
Rated 30 Sep 2012
79
39th
This feels like the black sheep of the MCU. With a bad guy and plot similar to the early 2000's superhero movies, this movie just feels different. Edward Norton makes a good Hulk, Tim Roth makes a solid bad guy. Everything's there, it's just not following the current Marvel Superhero formula and following an older formula. Is that better?
Rated 19 Jun 2008
45
25th
A solid summer actioner, even if it is a bit mindless. This movie has more in common with the TV show than anything, attempting to fix Lee's version's problems, but unfortunately removes too much of its brain (or perhaps leaves it on the cutting room floor). Roth steals the show as Blonsky, and Norton is solid in the lead. Tyler is utterly forgettable, and Hurt can't match Sam Elliott's intensity. But when Hulk smash, Hulk really smash.
Rated 26 Nov 2011
79
64th
Pretty damn good start the The Avengers thing Marvel has going. Norton was great, to bad he won't be the Hulk in the actual Avengers movie.
Rated 21 Dec 2017
5
10th
Edward Norton is incredibly bland as the Hulk. Same with Liv Tyler as the love interest. Still, the Incredible Hulk is interesting because tonally it does not match up with the MCU as a whole at all. In fact, it was seemingly ignored until recently with the use of Ross in Civil War. It's pretty clear that with the success of Iron Man and the lackluster response to the TIH, that the MCU as a result followed Iron Man's tone in it's development and conception. And it's easy to see why.
Rated 21 Dec 2011
59
12th
I didn't enjoy this movie. There are a lot of talented actors in this, Edward Norton, Tim Roth etc. But they have all given better performances in better movies. The final big fight scene was boring and the story was uninteresting.
Rated 03 Jan 2012
30
17th
In a time where really good superhero films are made with great regularity, The Incredible Hulk just isn't worth your time. The action is dull, the situations begin and get resolved far too quickly, and the Hulk is a character that simply bores me. Compared to the likes of something like Iron Man from earlier in 2008, this is a bad movie with lifeless characters and an almost non-existent plot.
Rated 17 Jun 2008
15
6th
I didn't like him even when he's angry. Without anymore expectations even the action sequences were devoid of any excitement.
Rated 10 Dec 2014
45
37th
Admittedly, this was pretty great while on peyote. Couldn't understand why the entire movie they won't just leave him alone. That's all he wants. And then you wonder why he gets so angry?
Rated 01 Dec 2008
30
18th
What a waste of Norton's talents. Not a bad movie, but nothing spectaculair as well.
Rated 15 Jun 2008
60
35th
Thankfully the 1-hour long how-the-superhero-got-his/her-powers(the origins) was gone but still the film stumbles often; the pace sucks. Generally uninspired and without ambition - the best thing about the film is that it reminds how masterful Ang Lee's depiction of Hulk was.
Rated 01 Jul 2008
6
34th
More fun and entertaining than Lee's version (which was too boring for words), but that's what it is, ENTERTAINING, a real no brainer, all they do is run or fight, which pretty much sums up the entire film. And as for the hulk's backstory, not much is really explained (well it's Leterrier so...), but as far as summer movies go, it's respectable. This is particularly due to Norton's presence, I think I would've left the theater very soon if he wasn't there...
Rated 15 Oct 2008
87
82nd
Action packed and kinetic. This one maintains a better pace than the first very cerebral one. The action here is very well done and the effects of the Hulk character are about as realistic as you could expect a giant green man to appear. A couple of the fight scenes, though (particularly the last one between the Hulk and the Abomination) are filmed a little too close to really be able to easily follow the action. Other than that, this one is great.
Rated 26 Apr 2010
20
1st
With the financial viability of superhero movies proven in the early '00s by the success of the X-Men and Spiderman franchises, producers quickly developed highly advanced technology, allowing for entire superhero movies to be created, from script to screen, by computers, requiring humans only for an afternoon or two to come in and read their lines off a prompter, and sign the appropriate licensing agreements. The Hulk: green like money.
Rated 27 Feb 2020
91
32nd
"Don't make me hungry... you won't like me when I'm hungry." A really great cast, actually, with Liv Tyler, Tim Roth and Edward Norton. Would've been interesting to see it play out as a trilogy like Iron Man did. I knew this was one of the weaker entries in the MCU, but definitely better than I remembered it. (First logged 5/11/2015)
Rated 12 Jun 2010
70
50th
There's a really interesting idea at the center of this movie. Basically we're shown during the first 45 minutes how every time Banner becomes the Hulk he loses everything. His home, his money, his job, his friends, everything. There are other superhero movies with a similar kind of theme, but we're never shown it this convincingly. Near the end we're shown a hint of Banner adopting a monk-like existence. This is all great. However, about 60% of this movie is kinda conventional and boring.
Rated 10 Jan 2011
1
0th
It's the crappy summer blockbuster Marvelites probably deserve.
Rated 08 Nov 2011
60
52nd
I'm not sure if Marvel's second attempt at a Hulk film is any better than its first. This one is certainly less ambitious, and easier to follow. Norton is believable as a low-key Banner but not as the Hulk, as we aren't really sure what he's repressing and what fuels his anger (perhaps its his separation from Betsy Ross, but the only proof of this is repeated staring at her photo). The villain is also lacking - Blonksy's motivations are unclear and he is severely underplayed by Tim Roth.
Rated 15 Jun 2008
80
69th
Well acted and directed with an ok script and great action. Skillfully avoids a sluggish origins story.
Rated 01 Jul 2008
70
18th
A mindless superhero flick which trades in Ang Lee's directorial vision and the psychological essence of the hulk myth for a lot of big explosions and CGI extravaganza. Fans of the tv-series and the golden age marvel comic books might be thrilled, but those who go looking for a little depth in their super hero buffet, might want to look for a different restaurant. But hey, you can't compare fast food with haute cuisine anyway.
Rated 22 Dec 2009
75
66th
It has everything the Eric Bana version lacks and more. Unfortunately Liv Tyler and Jeff Bridges can't hold a candle to their counterparts from the previous movie (and that's one of the few things that really holds this movie back). The action scenes are phenomenal.
Rated 23 Sep 2008
55
34th
I expected soo much more since Ed Norton was starring in it. Let me get this right, he cuts his hand while walking on a railing, and his blood falls into a bottle. How about if you step in shit, and shit falls down? Little things like this bother me..
Rated 09 Aug 2009
75
58th
Highly entertaining pulp, but not much substance. The film trades the more cerebral approach that Lee favored for a more action packed feel. Despite the action being decidedly better, the film is less interesting than Lee's flawed effort.
Rated 19 Jan 2011
65
33rd
Incredible Hulk: The Series Movie
Rated 17 Apr 2011
79
39th
Better than the first Hulk movie.
Rated 30 Dec 2012
25
17th
Only slightly better than Ang Lee's abomination, and worse cast. The Hulk has yet to receive worthwhile treatment in a standalone film and I'm beginning to think he's just not cut out for it. As a side character, he's great, but I think it might be time to give the Hulk franchise up as a bad job.
Rated 19 Jul 2008
75
57th
A great comic book film. Edward Norton does a really good job in this. The special effects are solid, and Hulk looks awesome, A lot better than 2003's. However, points are subtracted for a terrible script and a very bad plot.
Rated 27 Jul 2014
3
14th
The Incredible Hulk is a definite improvement on Ang Lee's awful predecessor. In comparison this is better in every way, but that said it's still a poor excuse for a Hulk film. I loved the character growing up and like so many other fans out there I'm just crying out for a worthy Hulk film. Plot wise it's completely forgettable, but the set pieces are much more enjoyable this time around and are worth a watch. Norton phones in his performance and overall this is a weak step towards the Avengers.
Rated 21 Jun 2008
4
43rd
A mostly enjoyable action movie. It makes interesting use of genre, avoiding nearly all the standard beats of the typical superhero film and really being more of a chase / thriller movie that happens to be about a superhero: Hulk meets Bourne. The action scenes and special effects are solid. Ed Norton is as watchable as always but Tim Roth is mega entertaining and arguably steals the show as the villain.
Rated 06 Jul 2008
45
28th
10 steps behind Ang Lee's version. More action, but absolutely no sense. Usually Norton shines but he doesn't even glimmer in this movie. Bad shaky cam and way too much CGI.
Rated 29 Apr 2011
83
46th
A big improvement over the first Hulk film that gives us what we want- action, some personality and a tight narrative.
Rated 06 Mar 2018
73
29th
A disaster from a marketing perspective but not as bad as you would think so. This is probably the only film from MCU that you could call an outlier, both in tone and success. Too dramatic sometimes, lingering too much in action scenes at others, these are the results when creative differences exists between the production team. Nevertheless It was still very touching and an accurate representation of a tragic antihero, and probably the scariest yet most sympathizing hulk that ever existed.
Rated 05 Apr 2019
42
12th
I wonder if Marvel studios create scripts based on a checklist of sorts: uncomplicated story- check, love angle - check, possible joke situations - check, plot twist - check, explosions - check, troubled hero lookalike - check, big bad enemy - check, big good green blob (extra points) - check, famous actors - check, good side prevailing - check. Ding ding ding ding! we have a winner ladies and gentlemen a movie worth dying for. Suprisingly it also makes me question my movie selection choices.
Rated 24 Apr 2019
58
6th
put me off the mcu cancelled my endgame ticket
Rated 29 Aug 2019
65
32nd
The action is passable and Edward Norton fits the central role well enough. As far as the greater MCU is considered, The Incredible Hulk is a little too safe and nowhere near the level of Iron Man from the same year.
Rated 24 Mar 2020
55
20th
Nice try but it's not what we wanted. To be fair, it wasn't that bad (particularly on 2nd viewing), but the fact that it wasn't quite an origin story means that they had to play by other rules, and also feels separate from the overall MCU. Edward Norton is fine, but now that we are used to Mark Ruffalo in the role, he just doesn't live up to it. The fine battle is a little anti-climatic, especially as the monster form of Abomination, isn't nearly as interesting as the human form.
Rated 04 Nov 2021
10
2nd
Stark was too late to try to save this one
Rated 11 Oct 2008
55
41st
Sincerely, I expected more. Principally, for having one of my favorite actors, Norton. The plot is very poor, at no moment it fascinates of truth. The attempt was good, at last the movie of Ang Lee also it was not pleasing very much, but unfortunately not this time was that Hulk was well adapted in the cinema.
Rated 04 Aug 2008
60
36th
Arguably better than Ang Lee's Hulk, because it has Edward Norton in it, and he makes Bruce Banner much more likable than Eric Bana's wimp. But the problem is inherent in the Hulk - there is only so much the Hulk can do - getting angry and smashing things.
Rated 10 Oct 2008
85
80th
Better than Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk only adds to the hype of the inevitable Avengers movie. If the stars of each film truly plan on being involved we are in for one super movie.
Rated 14 Jul 2008
75
62nd
Ed Norton and Tim Roth alone already make this better than Ang Lee's version. It's deeper than just your normal Hulk, but it's still really entertaining.
Rated 19 May 2013
63
50th
Starts off really good (with a Rickson Gracie cameo! wtf?) but gradually declines in quality with the final 20 or so minutes being bad.
Rated 03 Mar 2018
80
35th
I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. Hulk movies always get a bit of a bad rap. The Hulk is about smashing things, but also about the conflict that is within him between Bruce Banner and the Hulk. It is a difficult thing to portray and I think this movie did a serviceable job of it. That's not to say it's perfect. It has some not very pretty CGI and some of the story elements are a bit lacking. I mean how many incidents does General Ross get to start here? I liked it, but I didn't love it.
Rated 08 Mar 2015
83
33rd
http://youtu.be/xbqNb2PFKKA?t=1m15s || this trailer is better than any super hero movie could ever be, maybe future critics will watch our film history in terms of the development of our trailer aesthetics, because they, just as commercials, are way ahead of anything the tv/movie machine could ever hope to produce,
Rated 30 Jun 2016
74
46th
Banner's situation is so unspeakably terrible that it's hard to imagine him finding any peace at all, ever again. Yet Ross's unflinching loyalty makes it seem possible, even knowing the love story is likely doomed to failure. If not for Banner's own personal conflicts, this movie would have been dreadful. Thankfully, Norton and Tyler make it pretty dang good.
Rated 13 Jan 2017
80
13th
not bad, but mark ruffalo is all i want and that's saying something because i love edward norton.
Rated 18 Apr 2017
70
65th
Marvel's attempt to reboot the character of the "Hulk" inside the new "Marvel Cinematic Universe" in building up to "Marvel's Avengers"(2012) was merely adequate. While the film washed the taste of Ang Lee's "Hulk"(2003) out of audiences' mouths, it failed to do anything memorable beyond the traditional "Hulk Smash" action. Edward Norton is an okay Bruce Banner and Tim Roth plays a decent bad guy, but the rest of the characters are all pretty flat with the Liv Tyler love story being the worst.
Rated 06 Jul 2008
81
44th
Well, since they came out just a month apart, it's impossible not to say, "Not as good as IRONMAN"... A lot of it works for me though. But, I have the same problem that I had with the first one with Bana: It looks like animation to me... But it's getting better.
Rated 27 Oct 2012
50
14th
This movie was not bad. It was just too similar in the overall story to "Iron Man". The main reason it didn't get a better rating is because of the cross-promoting of another movie. If you're good, you can catch the cameos by RDJ himself. This movie just didn't pop for me but Edward Norton was suprisingly good as Bruce Banner. I also give props to the designer of the favella chase scene.
Rated 26 May 2010
25
4th
Boring as hell, no real plot, shitty script -- just the same old recycled action crap.
Rated 07 Apr 2009
50
19th
I feel like I have memory loss. What happened in this movie and why don't I care? Bland bland bland.
Rated 12 Jun 2009
51
25th
Fair rendition of the comics and better than "Hulk".
Rated 05 Aug 2010
6
65th
melhor que o primeiro...
Rated 12 Aug 2009
70
46th
Much better than the last, but still not a great movie.
Rated 19 Jun 2008
72
57th
HULK SMASH Not bad at all and avoids drifting into the soup of origin story-ness that other films don't SMASH OF HULK However only Liv Tyler seems bothered to do much acting, with Ed Norton strangely flat SMASHETH HULK On the plus side the action buts are solid and at times inventive, as you'd hope from the director of The Transporter, oh and HULK SMASH they make sure the Hulk smashes stuff, because thats what we want dammit.
Rated 25 Jun 2008
82
78th
I think this movie did a damn fine job. It's hard to decide whether to judge this movie on its own, or hold it up to the Ang Lee version. Either way, it think the movie is successful. Edward Norton and Liv Tyler are very good as Bruce Banner and Betty Ross and Tim Roth is pretty badass. The CGI is certainly far more advanced to make a convincing Hulk.
Rated 28 Jan 2015
50
21st
I hardly remember anything about this film, yet I know I saw it. Meh.
Rated 29 Feb 2016
78
72nd
i woulda liked this movie a lot more if it wasn't a hulk movie. it just wasn't the way i wanna see hulk portrayed. But i liked it a lot more this time. I used to hate roth but liked him more now. Hulk was woozy from antidote. Still at times he wasnt angry/powerful enough. I liked the hiding, romance, and needing to use hulk to win etc. Bad betty cab anger joke was the only standout bad hing. And rehashing the metal hands. They need to bring her back for world war hulk. -1 cuz BG
Rated 18 Jan 2009
80
67th
Ten times better than the 1st one.
Rated 24 May 2009
72
50th
Better than the other one. I hope they continue to realize that the comics are done by different creative teams so the movies can follow a similar track. Just because one movie bombs doesn't necessarily mean that the characters suck. There is so much that can go wrong on a movie, as the 3 or so Punisher films can teach us. I'm optimistic that they'll get it right eventually.
Rated 08 May 2011
6
26th
Couldn't all this have been avoided if Bruce Banner had simply checked into a Buddhist monastery?
Rated 28 May 2017
45
7th
The MCU's only real misstep.Just boring action,boring characters ,a very familiar story with weak villains and mediocre to bad cgi.It also doesn't help that the MCU , to a large degree, has ignored this movie and it's events(and its main actor lol).
Rated 25 Jun 2008
69
61st
I've never really been a fan of the Incredible Hulk (it's at the bottom of my favorite Marvel franchises). Leterrier, Norton and co opt for a fun, well made comic book movie to help counter the memory of the abortion that Ang Lee made. Good enough.
Rated 25 Jun 2008
79
67th
I liked it well enough. This is the Hulk movie that should have been. It's a ton of fun and has great action with just the right dose of insider moments to make for enjoyable summer fun.

Collections

(54)
Compact view
Showing 1 - 24 of 54 results

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...