Watch

To Rome with Love

Remove ads

To Rome with Love

2012

Romance

Comedy

1h 52m

A story about a number of people in Italy, some American, some Italian, some residents, some visitors, and the romances and adventures and predicaments they get into.

Directed by:

Written by:

Starring:

Alessandra Mastronardi Monica Nappo

Genres:

Romance, Comedy

Countries:

Italy, Spain, USA

Languages:

English, Italian

More information at IMDb

See title update history

Suggest an edit

Show Less

Your probable score

To Rome with Love

2012

Romance

Comedy

1h 52m

Your probable score

Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Avg Percentile 37.76% from 1573 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(1573)

Compact view

clear

Compact view

Show

Sort

Bagger

Rated 03 Aug 2012

A movie from Woody is like a birthday card from a grandparent at this point. You know excatly what the text is going to be and what amount of money is gonna be within. You would complain if it weren't for one simple fact: You do love that money so.

Rated 03 Aug 2012

Report

Langelund

Rated 21 Aug 2012

To Rome with Randomness

Rated 21 Aug 2012

Report

KasperL

Rated 30 Aug 2020

"You guys, you guys... I've now watched every single Woody Allen-directed movie!" *after being booed and hit with a tomato, Kasper goes to the corner - his own little completist's corner, mind you - to plan future accomplishments*

Rated 30 Aug 2020

Report

getmoney

Rated 27 Oct 2012

I suppose I am in the minority here and this is going to through off my TCIs, but I absolutely loved this film. I was smiling ear to ear from beginning to end and I just found it so wonderful to watch. No, I don't think it will go down as one of Allen's best - of course not. But it is a lot funnier than its getting credit for, and there are a lot worse ways to spend an afternoon in a theatre. I really, really, really liked this.

Rated 27 Oct 2012

Report

ZayanK

Rated 24 Jul 2012

There are no less than 4 Woody Allens in this movie.

Rated 24 Jul 2012

Report

FlorVdE

Rated 05 Jul 2012

Works when Allen sticks to what he's good at, i.e. neurotic acting & the very fun Baldwin-Eisenberg storyline. Unfortunately, 2 out of 4 stories fall completely flat: the "15 minutes of fame"-thing has been done to death and the 'happy hooker' seen here not only brings nothing new to table, but is borderline offensive.

Rated 05 Jul 2012

Report

moraesfelipe

Rated 24 Jun 2012

Some wonderfully shot scenes -- Benigni on the streets, the mortician singing in the shower -- and Woody still doesn't seem totally enchanted with Europe, which is good, but he just expands the Midnight in Paris' low fantasy into four vignettes, about americans and italians. Only one works, with Eisenberg and Page truly matching Woody's material. The rest is too easygoing, too adorable, too relaxed. Woody, please, get back to New York. We need our atheist, grumbling, irritable little jew back.

Rated 24 Jun 2012

Report

Suture Self

Rated 04 Nov 2013

A very playful movie by a director who is incredibly comfortable with what he does and can do basically anything he wants. Sometimes I wonder if I under-appreciate Woody Allen's more recent affairs if only because I'm so familiar with his work (this is my 39th Woody Allen movie). They do run together in a way, yet, even when watching a "lesser" flick like TO ROME WITH LOVE, there's really no one quite like him. Enjoyable.

Rated 04 Nov 2013

Report

frederic_g54

Rated 08 Jul 2012

Woody light, that is to say, could've easily been worse. It was nice to see him in front of the camera again, back to his mumbling, neurotic self, and the Baldwin storyline had an amusing egde to it, though I can't say I was giddy at the prospect of Eisenberg and Page's potential match-up; Both have the sex appeal of a toilet seat. Diverting, if nothing else.

Rated 08 Jul 2012

Report

wetwillies

Rated 09 Jul 2012

Good. The Eisenberg/Baldwin story is the most substantial, as its the one that gives Woody the chance to make the most commentary. The other three are just really fun to watch, mostly because Woody and Roberto Benigni are back on the screen and Penelope Cruz is stunning. Pretty good cast all around, nice cinematography and a great score.

Rated 09 Jul 2012

Report

djross

Rated 11 Mar 2013

The temporality made no sense, but this just means Woody Allen is playing around with form, because he figures why not do so, and trusts the audience to work it out for themselves. Sometimes it seems he's the only working American director really relaxed enough to play around like this, just as it sometimes seems that he is the only director anywhere who, in filmmaking terms, is not a sexual hypocrite. A few pretty funny moments. My fortieth Woody.

Rated 11 Mar 2013

Report

AndreasThau

Rated 23 Aug 2012

I liked some characters, like Benigni's, but others didn't work at all, like Baldwin's, although I liked the casting of him. Generally, I find it, that Allen's touch is lacking a bit of finesse in this flick. I'm never really interested or surprised. Best story though, was the one about the singer. Maybe because I didn't know the actor...?

Rated 23 Aug 2012

Report

Ytadel

Rated 10 Jul 2012

The four stories aren't without their amusing bits and ideas, but the utter lack of ANY connective tissue between them - a single character crossing between stories, shared settings, thematic or even tonal crossover, anything - made it a mystery why this was even a feature-length movie when it could have just been four separately released shorts. I was ready for it to be over by the end.

Rated 10 Jul 2012

Report

natebarrios

Rated 08 Dec 2012

I may have liked it more if the vignettes were not interspersed.

Rated 08 Dec 2012

Report

myfavchords

Rated 11 Sep 2012

This is another very funny film by Woody Allen. This movie deals with relationships, fame and fidelity among other things. There are several interesting characters and stories. The plot parts that had to do with fame are really entertaining. The opera is hilarious and there are any other funny scenes. This is a must see if you are a Woody Allen fan.

Rated 11 Sep 2012

Report

tancan

Rated 12 Jul 2018

That's a superb anti film! Lots of meaningful criticism. American opportunism meets with Italian food patriotism. From being cool with philosophical words to meaningless famosity that reflects our day. Lots of absurdism. I loved it.

Rated 12 Jul 2018

Report

bentien

Rated 25 Sep 2012

Worst Woody Allen movie I've seen so far. A fine first 40 minutes are completely ruined by unbelievably annoying characters and an uncommonly sloppy script by Allen.

Rated 25 Sep 2012

Report

graveyardtan

Rated 15 Jan 2013

This mixed bag of gags and Philosophy is still better than 95 percent of the stuff out there.

Rated 15 Jan 2013

Report

SirRobbie

Rated 02 Sep 2012

It's a charming and funny movie, but I want more from this guy. Basta!!!

Rated 02 Sep 2012

Report

Actionberg

Rated 02 Apr 2013

Woody Allen and Judy Davis are a superb, hilarious couple in this. Everything else is a shadow of some element of an older Allen film. These stories are so segregated despite being edited into one another that it's a slog to jump around to each tired concept. Allen's Euro-era has had a handful of good films, but most of them are just so touristy. They offer the notion that they're about showing you what's great about the cities they take place in but the results are often surface-level insights.

Rated 02 Apr 2013

Report

Rufam

Rated 21 Sep 2012

Possibly Woody's worst film ever. Unfunny, predictable, moralistic and, worst of all, devoid even of the pleasantness of "Midnight in Paris" or "Whatever Works" (which were also far from riveting but at least amusing and likable), this is the closest Allen has ever come to making a truly bad picture. Sure, the cast is impressive and occasionally some of the story threads become mildly interesting, but it's still a largely joyless and redundant effort.

Rated 21 Sep 2012

Report

JPFerguson

Rated 30 Jun 2020

Allen really misses the mark here for me. I cannot get past the ridiculous premise of the film. There is good ridiculous and bad ridiculous, this is definitely the latter.

Rated 30 Jun 2020

Report

tracy

Rated 02 Sep 2022

Lame fluff, but not as punishingly dull as You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger, even though the two-hour runtime is pretty brutal. Has a couple genuine laughs and I like when Woody and Judy Davis are on screen. Also it's inherently funny that Gerwig and Page were in a Woody Allen movie (that Monica lesbian scene has aged well! The Woodman is a prophet!!), particularly because they share a lot of screen time with Alec Baldwin, who is pretty fun in this. Roberto Benigni looks like Max Wright.

Rated 02 Sep 2022

Report

glumpy_99

Rated 29 Oct 2012

Enjoyable Woody trifle which has little to say, and suffers from a lack of thematic connections in its stories, but as a disposable entertainment it works very well, moreso in parts than as a whole. Highlights include a delightful return to acting form by Allen himself, complemented by an excellent Allen imitation by Eisenberg, even if Eisenberg's story thread feels like a throwback to 70s sensibilities rather than the youth culture of modern times. Entertaining if not especially memorable.

Rated 29 Oct 2012

Report

cowfrappe

Rated 02 Jan 2013

Indulgent and silly.

Rated 02 Jan 2013

Report

msprague

Rated 03 Aug 2012

Roberto Benigni was entertaining. The Alec Baldwin/Jesse Eisenberg part was good too but for that part alone. Sadly, for me, this was a bit tiresome and I was ready for it to end sooner than later.

Rated 03 Aug 2012

Report

rttntomatoes

Rated 03 Jan 2014

To Rome With Love sees Woody Allen cobbling together an Italian postcard of farce, fantasy, and comedy with only middling success.

Rated 03 Jan 2014

Report

BNGPotential

Rated 21 Jan 2013

I really like many Woody Allen movies that even fans dislike, Melinda & Melinda and Whatever Works, but this one really kind of falls more than flat, but somehow also feels very Italian. It was hard to even find that tiny nugget of profundity that Woody normally without fail leaves for you. Maybe it was rushed or something. He should take a another shot at Rome, the city deserves it.

Rated 21 Jan 2013

Report

PeaceAnarchy

Rated 21 Jan 2013

An uneven film with a mess of a plot, but it's still charming and really funny. No one is particularly great, except maybe Alec Baldwin, but they all hit their marks often enough, and every story delivers at least a couple of good payoffs. Even Page, who is the most miscast, works if you think of her as channeling Woody.

Rated 21 Jan 2013

Report

dwyer

Rated 15 Jan 2013

Each of the four stories starts out interesting, but even in this abbreviated, vignette-like form, only one manages to stay interesting to its end. The rest get draggy, slow, and boring.

Rated 15 Jan 2013

Report

burrr

Rated 31 May 2018

54.00

Rated 31 May 2018

Report

PetrosTser

Rated 05 Oct 2013

Woody's worst. Seriously tedious and embarrassingly unfunny. This is so disappointingly uninspired.

Rated 05 Oct 2013

Report

Stewball

Rated 13 Jul 2012

From cheap sit-com to some pretty good humor (mostly Baldwin and Allen) , it was a hit and miss mess. Penelope Cruz casts two shadows of her former self.

Rated 13 Jul 2012

Report

muutanet

Rated 07 Dec 2012

Woody Allen raises the art of common people on the level of high art. For him a simple worker can produce the level of art as does the professional highly paid artist. It's the needle in the flesh of high art as Rowan Atkinson did in his movie Bean: The Ultimate Disaster Movie (nobody paid attention that the painting was a fake!). I like the fantasy level of Woody Allen, but practically only Alec Baldwin's got funny and well written character.

Rated 07 Dec 2012

Report

Henrik

Rated 18 Oct 2012

To Rome with pointlessness.

Rated 18 Oct 2012

Report

Ryan Lueders

Rated 14 Jan 2013

This movie wasn't an abject failure but it wasn't a success either. All the characters were delightful in some ways but if you ask me what this movie is about I would say... how the hell should I know? Was Alec Baldwin really there or was he a narrator? Why does Woody Allen act? Does he think he is Larry David and is funny? What the heck was up with the whole Roberto Benigni storyline? This movie leaves you with more questions than answers. The only redeemable thing is that it can make you laugh

Rated 14 Jan 2013

Report

Duco

Rated 13 Nov 2012

A pleasant romantic story, which, while playfully connecting seemingly unrelated characters together, fails to deliver any really memorable scenes. Some love-duos are simply way better than others (okay, I'm biased here as I absolutely love Ellen Page), and while most of the comic reliefs work, some of them don't and ruin the other experience. A pleasant Woody Allen movie, but nothing more. Then again, I guess a good comedy/romantic movie is a lot nowadays...

Rated 13 Nov 2012

Report

CCLZA

Rated 20 Aug 2012

Lacks focus and wastes time in clichés and just uninteresting characters and situations. As expected, the cast fares pretty well and at least one storyline works rather well. It's mostly entertaining even if it depends on cheap laughs.

Rated 20 Aug 2012

Report

drstrangeluv

Rated 30 Oct 2012

We watched this on our flight to Italy. It made me wish I could ask the pilot to turn the plane around.

Rated 30 Oct 2012

Report

Yiannos

Rated 23 Jul 2014

(VIewed on 17/01/13)Typical postcard nonsense from U.S directors making films in romantic Euro cities, but unlike Midnight In Paris it doesn't question its romanticised engagement. The Italian characters are pure stereotypes--stubborn, hotheaded, overtly sexual and open to affairs etc--but they are balanced by somewhat amusing scenarios which test their values. Penelope Cruz was a standout as a high class whore, and there are definitely a few laughs, but it's completely forgettable.

Rated 23 Jul 2014

Report

ratedargh

Rated 03 Dec 2012

Some inspired moments keep this from being a total bust. It's mostly aimless, though, and feels like material that was left on the cutting room floor; humourous anecdotes that never belonged on film.

Rated 03 Dec 2012

Report

skittlez

Rated 05 Aug 2013

I feel like it was trying to make a point, but I missed it.

Rated 05 Aug 2013

Report

fmoraes

Rated 20 Apr 2017

2012/07/10

Rated 20 Apr 2017

Report

Luna6ix

Rated 25 Aug 2012

i'm a near indiscriminate lover of all allen movies and this one lands squarely in the middle. i easily appreciated many lines and characters here. the one thing that irks me is that page's character is one that commonly appears in allen movies, and i hate that person with a passion. this movie will, however, be eternally remembered by me as the first allen movie i've seen in the theater. (a life goal).

Rated 25 Aug 2012

Report

astrakhan

Rated 10 Aug 2013

This movie bored me stupid. One of Allen's worst ever IMO. I would have cut out the whole Benigni story - an incongruous, banal one-joke strand. Cut out Alec Baldwin and his annoying Jiminy Cricket cameo. That just leaves the young love triangle story, which is material way below the likes of Gerwig, Page and Eisenberg. And the Italian-American story, which is 75% Woody Allen doing long-winded unfunny Woody Allen bits - talk about Rome being the world capital of narcissism!

Rated 10 Aug 2013

Report

paniskalpel

Rated 21 Sep 2012

Dobra satyra na celebrytów. Ogólnie plus.

Rated 21 Sep 2012

Report

andayb

Rated 14 Oct 2012

Rome is no Paris or Barcelona, that's we get from this one. 4 disjointed stories, and one only manages to look like a Allen movie. His witty dialogues are all over the place, and the cast does their job well, but wtihout a compelling script, this one is destined to be an "also-ran" in the otherwise excellent filmography of Allen.

Rated 14 Oct 2012

Report

billkerwin

Rated 27 Jul 2014

Allen goes through the motions, producing something breezy and amiable, Not bad, it you don't mind him ripping off Fellini's "White Nights" for about a quarter of the the plot.

Rated 27 Jul 2014

Report

isaboojum

Rated 24 Sep 2017

One of the most embarrassing films I've ever seen.

Rated 24 Sep 2017

Report

Derekstar

Rated 19 Nov 2012

I hate anthology movies, because here's the thing... who gives a shit? In this case, I gave a shit. Mostly. There were two strong storylines, whereas most anthology movies have zero.

Rated 19 Nov 2012

Report

CStewart64

Rated 02 May 2016

W2E0P1S0V1M1A1R1. Has that Woody Allen charm, but is a total waste of space. Among the worst of his "why did they let him make this" movies?

Rated 02 May 2016

Report

DarkNights

Rated 27 Nov 2023

Film très drôle, avec tous les clichés les plus sophistiqués, et les plus simplets de l'auteur, cette fois en Italie. Tout n'est que quiproquos amoureux, satires, et réflexions sur les rapports humains. Pénélope Cruz est radieuse en prostituée. Un peu désordonné, mais plaisant.

Rated 27 Nov 2023

Report

gokcanz

Rated 12 Nov 2013

* Casting, Acting : 6 * Script : 7 * Directing, Aura : 8 * Ease of Viewing : 8 * Naked Eye : 7.5

Rated 12 Nov 2013

Report

omgfridge

Rated 15 Oct 2012

Felt completely numb throughout and I justs didn't care about anyone or anything.

Rated 15 Oct 2012

Report

Dery

Rated 28 Jan 2013

Monica,John ve Jack'in hikayesi ne güzeldi öyle.

Rated 28 Jan 2013

Report

Filligan

Rated 09 May 2013

It's funny a lot of people find this film pointless due to its zero connectivity between vignettes, and that sounds like a criticism I would share in most respects, but for whatever reason it never even occurred to me while watching this film. Whether I was intrigued by Baldwin cynically advising Eisenberg, puzzled by Benigni's arbitrary antics, or laughing at Woody Allen supplying some of his best schtick since Whatever Works, I enjoyed the entire little stroll through Rome.

Rated 09 May 2013

Report

mikemcc

Rated 17 Feb 2013

This film has its moments, but I think there were too many stories. The film tries to explore the nature (and pursuit) of fame, but sometimes the gags get in the way. It's a disappointment after "Midnight in Paris," but it was sufficiently entertaining.

Rated 17 Feb 2013

Report

Timon88

Rated 26 Jun 2015

To Rome with saccharine. The only enjoyable element was Alec Baldwin's cynical commentary on the twerp's doomed infatuation.

Rated 26 Jun 2015

Report

burkayadalig

Rated 24 Oct 2012

none of the characters work, the script is unbelievably shallow and the movie has no purpose at all, other than being a "let's have a walk around beautiful Rome" guided tour

Rated 24 Oct 2012

Report

iqcumber

Rated 23 Apr 2013

Mostly very weak. Baldwin has nothing to do. Movie is confused. Benigni bits are the most enjoyable.

Rated 23 Apr 2013

Report

Greener

Rated 05 Jul 2020

I liked a little bit about how it slowly evolves from a seemingly safe comedy drama to a really weird one... and this was supposed to be an anthology film, right?

Rated 05 Jul 2020

Report

BeautyBliss

Rated 04 Aug 2012

Decent, but too many characters to develop them all, and too much time wasted on stupid things. Still, it's charming at points. Woody can still do it.

Rated 04 Aug 2012

Report

bizort

Rated 10 Jul 2013

Unfunny, boring, completely uninteresting

Rated 10 Jul 2013

Report

glm01

Rated 22 Oct 2013

58.000

Rated 22 Oct 2013

Report

ArkadyFalls

Rated 24 Aug 2014

Very hit-and-miss, with half of the stories being very enjoyable, and some of the performances very charming,... but this leaves several elements which are absurd to the point of being boring. And some of the dialogue is just so incredibly stilted, it's really disappointing. Not the best Woody Allen certainly, and not even his best story montage.

Rated 24 Aug 2014

Report

SirStuckey

Rated 08 Jul 2012

It's ok and has some funny bits, but it's no where near Woody's best.

Rated 08 Jul 2012

Report

Armilio

Rated 17 Jan 2015

I'm a Woody fan but also an italian. So, i will not hide that see all these cliches is hard to digest; but i can bear easily every cliché, every stereotype, with a great script which makes them funny. I'm not touchy, and i'm used to the stereotypes about us, they are even a good starting point for conversation with foreigns. But here the script is tired. A failed tribute to the classic italian anthology films. Lazy and banal pictures of Rome don't help.

Rated 17 Jan 2015

Report

tipar

Rated 21 Jul 2018

Good but the Benigni story makes a little comedown towards the end of the movie so "good but..." 69.

Rated 21 Jul 2018

Report

oplars

Rated 03 Feb 2023

First half is good, but the last half is awful - overuse of Roberto Benigni, like if he quickly had to write the last past of the script.

Rated 03 Feb 2023

Report

susmatt

Rated 26 Aug 2012

about sex and fleeting fame, mostly about sex, thin movie

Rated 26 Aug 2012

Report

TreyAtwood

Rated 05 Jul 2012

Allen tries to create so many caracters, but end up creating none. One would think he should know better, having made the same mistaken a least dozen times before.

Rated 05 Jul 2012

Report

cinegeek.de

Rated 18 Apr 2016

o Rome With Love bietet keine Überraschungen oder grössere Aufregung, dafür aber typisches Allen Vergnügen, dass bei ihm fast als Abonement erhältlich ist. Der New Yorker, der angeblich Manhattan nicht verlassen kann, dreht das vierte Mal in Folge in einer europäischen Stadt und führt Rom so vor, als ob Allen es als beflissener Tourist besucht hätte. (...)

Rated 18 Apr 2016

Report

chemical404

Rated 19 Jan 2014

In my opinion: underrated Woody Allen film (if we call a collection of shorts a film). It's really funny and charming film. Once again Woody warns us about delusions of love and emptiness of fame. I liked each of the four stories, but the one with Eisenberg is my favorite. My favorite of minor films of Woody's late period.

Rated 19 Jan 2014

Report

SlantMag

Rated 29 Jun 2012

""With age comes exhaustion," according to a rueful line late in the film, and it serves as a fitting diagnosis for Woody Allen's latest fallen souffle set in a European cultural capital." - Bill Weber

Rated 29 Jun 2012

Report

cagedwisdom

Rated 07 Jul 2012

When you have films with multiple stories, some will inevitably be less engaging than others. As a result, you spend a lot of time just waiting to get back to the interesting bits. The opera singer story and the newlyweds story (while not bad) were out of their depths, and I kept wishing the film would just go back to Baldwin (particularly) and Benigni. Films focusing on one story is almost always a good idea, I think. That said, I really liked it. Falling in love with Woody Allen's writing.

Rated 07 Jul 2012

Report

WalkenRoll

Rated 26 May 2013

All over the place in terms of plot, and the dialogue made me cringe so much I just wanted it to end.

Rated 26 May 2013

Report

oskarhu

Rated 26 Dec 2014

Interesting comedy with lots of clichés and absurdities.

Rated 26 Dec 2014

Report

danastevens

Rated 30 Nov 2012

At times this multiple-plot meander through the glorious labyrinth of the Eternal City can feel aimless, even lazy. But in the film's best moments, that willingness to wander works to its advantage.

Rated 30 Nov 2012

Report

bharath

Rated 30 Dec 2012

The movie is decently funny movie which has four co-existing stories all set in Rome. The acting is great as usual. The movie has its funny moments but thats is its limit. I liked the movie but I just felt the story lines not connecting. The movie felt like it lacked some sense of direction as the stories did.

Rated 30 Dec 2012

Report

caiman

Rated 18 Jul 2013

Works successfully as four independent short films. While some vignettes are better than others, they're all cleverly designed and, most importantly, funny. The characters, while all typical Allen, are enjoyable, and the situations they find themselves in are the kind of borderline fantasy that Woody does best. This definitely won't be considered one of his greats, but I was pleasantly surprised (especially given its mixed reviews) at how fresh and entertaining it turned out to be.

Rated 18 Jul 2013

Report

rfdutra

Rated 08 Nov 2012

Charming at some times and irritating at others.

Rated 08 Nov 2012

Report

Hofschneider

Rated 01 Jun 2013

How can you cast Greta Gerwig as the boyish type?! Just quit, Allen! Just make space for people who haven't lost interest in movies, people and everything meaningful 20 years ago...

Rated 01 Jun 2013

Report

bakcheia

Rated 02 Jun 2013

I'm just going to pretend this film doesn't exist and that I never saw it...

Rated 02 Jun 2013

Report

Tjekhov

Rated 12 Aug 2012

A joy to watch Allen's crazy bunuel-like take on rome, on anything but love.

Rated 12 Aug 2012

Report

mariane.c

Rated 24 Dec 2013

I can't decide if this is funny or annoying

Rated 24 Dec 2013

Report

turkishnwave

Rated 15 Apr 2016

Worth watching just for Rome and Woody Allen collaboration..

Rated 15 Apr 2016

Report

Icarus

Rated 26 Jan 2013

I enjoyed the Benigni bits most consistently, while the Eisenberg-Page-Baldwin and Penelope Cruz segments had their moments. However, the whole thing seems sloppy, as if the script were just thrown together. There are a few pretty pictures of Rome throughout, but Woody's never been much of a visual stylist. Thus, not even the formal choices can raise this beyond mediocrity.

Rated 26 Jan 2013

Report

Wezzo

Rated 07 Oct 2012

Despite its modest critical reception, I really enjoyed To Rome with Love. I liked the way its four distinct storylines didn't interconnect, but rather shared thematic elements; the notions of searching for direction and what it means to be a success are dealt with very well. Alec Baldwin and Jesse Eisenberg's tale with a trademark Allen magical twist is my favourite, but everyone here does strong work. It's nothing world-changing, but it's pleasant, funny, witty, and pretty.

Rated 07 Oct 2012

Report

Ofterdingen

Rated 09 Aug 2014

Bland, tame and Ellen Page is (of course) very annoying but not as bad as word on the street. My parents would probably enjoy it.

Rated 09 Aug 2014

Report

nuotio

Rated 17 Oct 2015

Low-tier Allen with an impressive cast as always. I saw this during a flight and have a hard time remembering anything about it.

Rated 17 Oct 2015

Report

sidehacker

Rated 23 Jan 2014

It's as self-conscious as anything Allen has ever done, which would be a problem for me but it also suggests some transparency from the filmmaker. It's okay.

Rated 23 Jan 2014

Report

Zipster

Rated 11 Aug 2014

I could sense how glad the whole theater was to see Woody again, fraught with anxiety and droll one-liners right off the bat. Though he'd probably never say, I think he's glad to be back. He's so sure-handed and lighthearted that not every premise needs to even connect or even be logically established, and none of that matters. This is his funniest movie since Deconstructing Harry, and has almost as big and eclectic a cast, not all of whom really come to life, but some are their best in years.

Rated 11 Aug 2014

Report