World War Z (2013)

Probable Score

Not Enough Info

Your Score

(0 - 100)

United Nations employee Gerry Lane traverses the world in a race against time to stop the Zombie pandemic that is toppling armies and governments, and threatening to decimate humanity itself. (imdb)

More Information and Actions

Cast and Information

Directed By: Marc Forster

Written By: J. Michael Straczynski, Drew Goddard, Damon Lindelof, Matthew Michael Carnahan

Starring: Brad Pitt, David Morse, Peter Capaldi, Pierfrancesco Favino, James Badge Dale, Ruth Negga, Mireille Enos, Matthew Fox, Sterling Jerins, Elyes Gabel, Fana Mokoena, Daniella Kertesz

Genres: Drama, Sci-fi, Action, Horror

Country: Malta, USA

Stream it now

Invalid Trailer

Ratings

Collections

Stats

Loading...
loading

World War Z belongs to 30 collections

1. Films available in HD (collaborative: moderated by kubricksucks - 13 stars)

2. Top 3000 movies with the most votes on IMDb (public: fanfic - 5 stars)

3. Worldwide box office over $500,000,000 (collaborative: moderated by djross - 3 stars)

4. Zombies (collaborative: moderated by ForrestQ - 3 stars)

5. Top 1000 movies with the most votes on IMDb (public: fanfic - 3 stars)

6. Globetrotting (collaborative: moderated by td888 - 2 stars)

7. Cinema Sins (collaborative: moderated by Phantom Nook - 2 stars)

8. Black List Films (public: jimmyjazz - 2 stars)

9. Top 2000 movies with the most votes on IMDb (public: fanfic - 2 stars)

10. film puanlamalarım (collaborative - 1 star)

11. Netflix instant LATAM (collaborative: moderated by Roman_Herbom - 1 star)

12. Amazon Prime Latam (collaborative: moderated by Roman_Herbom - 1 star)

13. Netflix Sverige (collaborative: moderated by Jakobostgren - 1 star)

14. Reza Archive (public: reza899 - 1 star)

15. Wishlist (collaborative)

16. FThisMovie Overrated (collaborative)

17. Read the Book and Seen the Movie (public: SirStuckey)

18. Movies I've Seen In Theaters (public: SirStuckey)

19. Pathé (public: QuickyAPI)

20. Pathé 2 (public: QuickyAPI)

21. Movies I Own (public: Farzan)

22. Force molly to watch these. (public: nauru)

23. 9/11-sploitation (public: Ag0stoMesmer)

24. saw in theater (public: ribcage)

25. Ryan - Seen in theaters (public: funky89)

26. Seen, Not Rated (public: SageSledge)

27. Luna6ix saw in theaters (public: Luna6ix)

28. Ayıla Bayıla İzlenen Filmler (public: Ozancan)

29. digital (public: ribcage)

30. 2010s watchlist (public: kendell)

Browse the full list of collections

Show:

All Ratings | With Reviews

Order by:

TCI | Percentile | Date Rated | # Stars (Reviews)

Stars	User	Rating
9	mwgerb	44 _34th
Having a zombie movie with a blockbuster budget and a worldwide scope is refreshing, and I liked some economical choices they made with the story. But Marc Forster is not the best action director (just hold the damn camera still) and the budget was so big that the studio in response refused to take any risks. As a result, we get serviceable PG-13 fare with a happy ending that, while entertaining and action-packed, doesn't achieve anything great or live up to its potential.
8	Barthalen	48 _25th
A film that has absolutely nothing to do with the book apart from the title. Wow. Everywhere in the world Brad Pitt shows up, 2 minutes later there's a major zombie outbreak that only he survives. Shooting him into space might have been the best choice. And the big reveal that will help humanity fight back against the undead? Ugh.
7	TheDenizen	50 _26th
Saw this flick with no sound, it was on in the background while I played a game of Scrabble with a friend. He was kinda slow on his turns so I had lots of time to marvel at how bad the CGI is and how old Brad Pitt looks in this. Also from what I could tell, it took nothing but the title from the source material. In the end, I actually played the word ZOMBIES on a triple word score, got the 50 point bonus for using all my tiles, and won by a landslide. Well played, me.
6	KasperL	60 _50th
A no-nonsense (or, actually, all-nonsense, I guess) summer blockbuster mess having all sorts of problems not worth getting into. Because what I'm recommending 'World War Z' for (and just barely) are the awesome Istanbul money shots. Forster's zombies know how to bloody move, I'll say that.
5	AFlickering	1 _4th
lol fucking calum marsh claiming this movie is good because its formal incoherence mirrors the experience of witnessing an apocalypse. i mean sure, the end of the world would probably be confusing and loud and protracted, but i can't imagine it'd be this bloodless and boring, nor so populated by 2D stereotypes and played-out genre tropes.
5	KMcNeil	5 _43rd
"Oh, there are zombies on this plane? Well, I'm sure this wall of suitcases will hold them at bay, seeing as how they just scaled the motherfucking biggest concrete wall this side of Helm's Deep."
4	joseywales	65 _44th
Full of plot holes and lame PG-13 action and far too many genre cliches, but entertaining nonetheless. If you've seen the Dawn of the Dead remake and played any Resident Evil games you've essentially seen this movie.
4	XakkMaster	65 _34th
Certainly a realistic depiction of how overwhelming a global zombie apocalypse could be, but much like Contagion, it presents more possibilities than answers. The problem is, the zombie genre is way too saturated and we've seen all this before. Plenty of action and frightening zombies, but nothing new/innovative. Visually, it's dark and full of unnecessary shaky cam. The best moments are when the camera pans back for the dramatic scenes of city-wide destruction. Worth a view for apocalypse fans.
4	ewp805	75 _60th
Hollywood's summer blockbuster crack at a big budget zombie flick comes studded with loads of senseless moments that serve only to pump as much suspense out of the audience as possible. Most of the scenes come out pretty thrilling, but a lackluster script and a flop of an adaptation of the source material weighs it down to typical entertainment.
4	FrederikA	65 _58th
Between the brisk pace and the sheer spectacle of cg-zombie hordes winning the corporate team-building challanges, WWZ gets the job done pretty well. It also proves that you can actually make an effective bloodless zombie flick, while at the same time proving how goddamn ridiculous and arbitrary the American censorship rules are.
4	DavidBlast	30 _13th
When it comes to zombies I am no connoisseur, in fact I usually find zombie movies as brain-dead as the monsters in which they feature. I know one thing though: Be they used for sloppy no-budget satire or rage-paced virulent former Englishmen - or even stoned black dudes standing around in some southern American cornfield, you can trust in gore - always. Zombies gotta eat - we gotta watch. When 'World War Z' fails at such a fundamental level, I laugh. I have no more tears for you, Hollywood...
4	Jasongirl67	75 _69th
As far as I'm concerned any movie that Brad Pitt is in you can eliminate the words horror of scary (unless your referring to the acting ....But I digress) Basically it's a good action flick and the enemy is the zombie plague and let's face it the zombies are laughable they don't even look like zombies George A. Romero was probably mortified when this came out
3	terrymac	58 _31st
Haven't read the book, but fancy giving it a go after seeing this. Parts of this are very effective - the opening scenes shot in Glasgow, Jerusalem-based pile o'zombs and the frighteningly quick spread of the whatever-it-was. Other parts, such as the family drama, and the Wales-based sequence, don't really add much to the experience. An enjoyable enough zombie/outbreak mash-up, but perhaps not enough novelty is brought to the table to make this a classic.
3	spleen	74 _52nd
Brad Pitt is like the Jessica Fletcher of the zombie world; everywhere in the world he travels bad things happen.
3	Velvet Crowe	35 _31st
Can't say I was surprised by this movie's awfulness, but did they REALLY need to take the name of a generally respected novel and then hardly use anything from said book? The movie follows every Hollywood disaster/zombie flick cliche as if it was routine, to the point they even use all the stock sound effects and music you've heard from other movies. The poor writing, child acting and inconsistent plot didn't make it better. Am I supposed to be impressed by any of this?
3	bakcheia	60 _46th
At least it wasn't boring? I mean it follows most blockbuster film cliches out there, but it certainly wasn't intolerable and it definitely built a palpable amount of suspense. The acting was decent too. Pretty much all of the problems were in the predictable and lazy writing.
2	cambel	50 _20th
unoriginal and messy but entertaining
2	djross	30 _13th
Episodic and meaningless blockbuster that fails on its own terms thanks to a weak third act. Leaves the impression that the filmmakers didn't know what they were doing or why they were doing it, for which they were roundly punished by having to accept a mere $540 million in worldwide ticket sales. Will they never learn?
2	Ytadel	5 _57th
I've always seen zombies as sort of a metaphor for disease, which makes me not a big lover of "fast zombies" - it kind of makes the whole thing into more of an "animals attack" movie. I do think the chaos of the initial attack is pretty cool, especially the mania of a grocery store being looted, and there's some interesting and clever bits toward the end. A lot of the middle grew tiring to me though. I do give them credit for actually using the word "zombie."
2	msprague	75 _74th
Loved the first two thirds. Loads of action, lots of gruesome, some insane shots of destruction which added to the story. The ending fizzled for me, I would have liked something more. Still worth seeing if you're looking for some tense film to view.
2	recklessmess	81 _76th
I'm pretty sure Madagascar would have been fine.
2	BillyShears	80 _77th
IT WAS GOOD. Most shocking news event of 2013.
2	Vandelay1	70 _75th
good movie
2	omgfridge	6 _53rd
Surprisingly fun. Not the greatest summer blockbuster but better than most of the shit you usually get.
2	forehead1	30 _11th
Picks up a smidge after the wooden wife and prerequisite irritating kids are dropped, and there are a couple of amusingly silly moments, but this is complete seen-it-all-before summer junk, full of tired clichés, glaring inconsistencies and crowbar plot devices. Perhaps they're explained better in the book but here all you can do is imagine the pre-production brainstorming session: "Hey, it'd be cool if THIS happened next!" "Yeah, but why would it?" "Who cares - let's do it!"
2	Cinema_Asia	60 _30th
Brad Pitt appears to possess super powers. He's able to survive any over the top life or death situation. There's one scene where he literally survives an epic crash only to walk away with minor injuries. Forget about what the plot is actually about or the supposed middle east political allegories, yadda yadda etc. etc. and imagine if you will that Brad Pitt is really Superman fighting zombies and this movie becomes so much better. I await my future royalties for coming up with this idea first..
2	Zio	30 _18th
Brad Pitt might give a charismatic performance, but that is not enough to pull the dreck that is World War Z out of the water. World War Z is confused as to the film it wants to be. The characters don't develop for a character drama nor is there any tension for a thriller. The action is barely functional as it is. The movie is held together by the thinnest of plots and tons of amazing coincidences.
2	ludvigsen	70 _61st
Great setpieces and moments of good ol' fashion suspense only just make up for the paperthin characters and the glossy "no blood whatsoever" Hollywood feel. Plays like a bigger, but essentially weaker Contagion.
2	MArkjp	50 _29th
Who the hell was that Israeli girl with the short hairdo? Also: I guess Matthew Fox isn't up for best performance in a supporting role.
2	hellboy76	68 _65th
Being a fan of the book and reading more and more about the film, I decided to go in with open mind and was pleasantly surprised. It's not great and there is some silliness but its a god damned zombie movie. Worth seeing for sure.
2	methad1	73 _64th
Good, but a bit rushed. I would of liked to have seen more of the devistation and effects caused by the mass hordes of zombies though. Didn't need to be 18/R rating, but would of been interesting to see what it may of added if it was.
2	jthusky	56 _32nd
It falls victim to blockbuster logic early and often. It's a mockery of its source material. But somehow, by achieving mere competence, World War Z gets a pass. It's relatively enjoyable because, you know, zombies and all. Doesn't set the world on fire; much better than it could have been.
2	xacviant	59 _14th
If not an out-and-out disaster, it's still a deeply flawed film, an uncomfortable mix of blockbuster heroics (bloodless, to secure a PG-13) and procedural which falters when it tries to engage the heart--especially in regard to the hero's (Brad Pitt) family--and fares only sporadically well when it tries to be thought-provoking. Ironically, the third act--focus of much of the retooling--works best, generating some genuine suspense. The best asset is Daniella Kertesz's understated performance.
2	Leonardis	79 _31st
Not bad considering it's PG-13. It doesn't offer anythig new but it is some solid entertainment. I did not read the book but I have heard people complain about accuracy. I still thought it was a decent watch if you're in the mood for something to keep you a little bit on a edge.
2	bof	51 _26th
This movie caused half the deaths of COVID19 by convincing people only Brad Pitt could save us from a virus.
2	mkellins	40 _21st
Zombie epidemic shown in a global scale sounds awesome but the novelty of it is quickly brought down by the idiotic screenplay and impersonal characters. I'm especially talking about Gerry. Looking old and sad does not suddenly make you an interesting character. Also the supernaturally fast zombies weren't particularly convincing or scary.
2	LookJabba...	5 _30th
World War Z initially looked like a promising and new take on the Zombie genre. The sense of scale here is much bigger and overwhelming than we've seen in previous Zombie films, but content wise we've seen it all before. The opening is intense and exciting, but over time the thin plot tires. The film soon begins to feel like a bunch of spectacular but pointlessly strung together set pieces. Brad Pitt is as reliable as ever, but a lack of depth and purpose make this just a very average watch.
2	TimeCapsule	65 _57th
A Hollywood amalgamation of popular modern zombie movies as Brad Pitt stars as "Action Man" the one true hope for humanity. Make sure to not get bit as we globe trot around the world running from poorly CGI infected zombies. Where the effectiveness of the hordes of zombies rely on the character's importance to the plot. Before watching eat your own brains.
2	vv238	45 _47th
The novel from which this takes its name is such a unique and interesting take on the zombie apocalypse and this is as formulaic and barely-passable as it gets. It is at the very least occasionally well-made formula.
1	wayofthegun	50 _11th
World War Z is more like several vignettes pulled together rather than one consistent movie. Some of the scenes are good, but as a whole, the movie is lacking.
1	yoohoo	60 _19th
Solid zombie chase flick. Far from perfect yet incredibly entertaining. The horde style flood of zombies was great to watch, felt like parts of a video game.
1	Kavu	70 _48th
The story has a bit too much of generic zombie stuff and a bit too little of what made the book good and Marc Forster couldn't direct an action scene if his life depended on it, but otherwise it's not too bad.
1	slidercc	75 _70th
Would have been better with a hard R rating and less of the annoying family bullshit. Otherwise, not bad.
1	lrampartl	39 _15th
Generic zombie movie, nothing like the book at all. Largely a waste of time. For someone who loved the book, this was crushingly disappointing.
1	Pickpocket	5 _44th
These zombies cray
1	cagedwisdom	75 _65th
Though the smaller moments are occasionally wonderful, the big action scenes don't really work, and a lot of the middle feels like filler. All a result of the plot being too contrived and twisty for its own good. The first and last 20 minutes, and the airplane sequence, were great. Has some jarring tonal shifts, with certain shots depicting the zombies near-comically in an otherwise extremely grim narrative.
1	Derekstar	80 _68th
I knew I was watching the right movie when 15 minutes into the zombie apocalypse there was an attempted rape.
1	PeaceAnarchy	83 _72nd
Certainly a different take on the zombie movie. I rather enjoyed the hectic globe trotting nature and the pacing is pretty good. It does feel like there are a bunch of missed opportunities for interesting depth and complexity.
1	evrana	81 _75th
I really enjoyed it; it was full throttle all along, extremely tense and disorienting. I'm a big fan of Forster's visual style and this one was the most enjoyable one since Stay. The Human Tower scene was beautiful and they put at least an effort to distinguish individual rombies (rabid zombies), and some of them are really creepy. It was like Contagion on amphetamines. And man, we are really afraid of hungry people, aren't we?
1	Radres	40 _12th
The great Lindelof strikes again! What a script with smart people acting stupid!
1	MJVmovieMan	76 _72nd
Brad Pitt and Marc Forester find an unlikely success with World War Z---a highly entertaining and suspenseful outbreak thriller that is almost impossibly good considering its production issues. Pitt delivers a strong performance and the plot moves at a great pace, amounting to a tight 2 hour run time full of great suspense. Even the PG-13 zombies aren't 'I-Am-Legend' bad as I feared. This is a solid summer movie.
1	Tripwyre	68 _56th
As much as I want to deride the film for cutting the impact of its drama for a PG13 rating, you know what? I was a kid once. You gotta send the elevator back down. And despite a lack of blood, the movie still manages to serve up a handful of unnerving sequences with a number of legitimate thrills and scares. The final third was obviously cobbled together with a different crew (the DP change is quite noticeable) but it works much better than a movie with this messy of a production history should.
1	Snazz	60 _50th
I can't help thinking that it's a shame to waste Pitt's talent on making a movie that mostly turns to the simplicity of very graphical and panic-filled horror scenes as its main scare tactics. It doesn't even bring anything new to the table story wise. Though, it is interesting to see a big Hollywood production like this let out a zombie outbreak - that almost never happens. Seeing it as a big zombie production, and nothing more, I think it clears the bar. A decent 2 hour watch for a Sunday.
1	chadisdanger	40 _1st
Blockbuster filmmaking without any character, soul, or bite. Everything from Brad Pitt's uncommitted performance (the guy can be amazing sometimes but he has nothing to work with here), the complete lack of unique character traits, the pathetic PG-13 action, the generic score and the dulled colour scheme adds up to just another depressing example of paint-by-numbers Hollywood fare. Competently made, I guess, but who gives a shit if there's nothing but emptiness at the heart of it?
1	Wiche	76 _72nd
This film takes the term "entertainment" to a whole new level. It's just packed with adventure which makes these two hours worth the watch. Then why only 76? Because this film really is nothing more. It hasn't got a decent plot, it hasn't got a decent dialogue, hell, it even doesn't have a decent ending.
1	ZombieBuffet	65 _67th
I knew it wasn't going to be like the book, but was still pretty unimpressed. The plot holes and nonsensical actions from the characters in the movie are a big distraction throughout.
1	sophie	75 _68th
I was pleasantly surprised. It was entertaining the whole time. The zombie scenes could have been a bit gorier for my taste but for a blockbuster zombie movie it was good.
1	imnotlaughin	40 _31st
"Gerry, I'd move mountains to get you in on this! Yer the best-o-da-best, I say! What all zombie apocalypses need is one great action hero." -- "But... then I'd have to leave my PERFECT HOLLYWOOD FAMILY behind... I won't do it. Not unless you threaten me." -- "Well, you couldn't be the reluctant hero if you just agreed to save the world. So, we're threatening you." -- COMMENCE THE MEDIOCRE, PG13, HOLLYWOOD EXAMPLE OF EVERYTHING THAT A ZOMBIE STORY SHOULDN'T BE! Woo! Happy ending!
1	Der_Barney	63 _7th
Hardly identifiable as being inspired by Max Brooks' awesome book. A lack of gore is hardly the issue, though. The uneven, lackluster, boring, soulless, formulaic, hamfistedly staged narrative is. Note to self: Avoid Marc Forster movies in future.
1	Luna6ix	75 _52nd
Brad Pitt jumps on the zombie train. Zombie movies have tread so much ground in the previous ten years that it seems nothing will surprise viewers anymore, and while this is a bit generic, it's notable that "World War Z" emphasizes the danger of the zombie horde, so much so, in fact, that it features the characteristic zombie pile up. There's something in this small idea that harkens back to zombies as a social satire for consumerism. For this, I find World War Z at least watchable.
1	Ofterdingen	71 _78th
A wildly uneven and inconsistent storyline can't ruin some very good scenarios drenched in pure solid suspense.
1	Langelund (CinemaZone.dk)	35 _19th
All bark, no bite.
1	SirStuckey	70 _56th
The overall story is solid, but it's too often undermined by Hollywood moments that don't make sense. They are only there to amp up tension which doesn't work if you think too much about it.
1	Okkervil	57 _46th
Fuck the zombies. You know the shit has really hit the fan when you crash land in Wales and wake up being interrogated by Malcolm Tucker!
1	dunetails	60 _38th
The first 2/3 is a relentless fun zombie movie, the last 1/3 after Israel was very clearly a hasty rewrite.
1	d_drudges	30 _30th
World War Z isn't a movie about zombies, it's a movie about class war. The sickly masses turn against the upper class, who promptly employ the military institution to shoot them in the head. The subtext is certainly interesting but the movie itself doesn't have much to offer. The plot is nonexistant and you're treated to random scenes of Brad Pitt getting into various problematic situations, usually featuring spectacularly idiotic writing.
1	overrated	31 _22nd
The first half is alright, second half post Korea airbase is terrible. The big climactic action scene in Israel feels like those in the SW prequels, just weightless mass and explosions. Not to get all nerd ABLOO BLOO about it (already brought up Star Wars...) but the amount of memorable stuff they didn't even touch from the book is shocking. For other people who read it, you'd think Battle of Yonkers and the celebrity fortress reality show would definitely be in it, nope bullshit lab sequence.
1	FrankHowley	65 _41st
I enjoyed it for the sheer novelty of it being the most expensive zombie film ever made and seeing the result of a disastrous production. It's not very good, but it's cool to see a zombie outbreak done on such a massive scale. The new third act is refreshing after an hour of over-the-top CGI zombie piles, but the "solution" still seems like an hastily written half-measure. I also love Brad Pitt, so this was a pleasure to watch despite the unseen gore and other issues.
1	Sweekoden	60 _47th
About as solid a movie like this could be. Doesn't have enough substance to warrant a great score, but it certainly has great visuals and some great, exciting action. Endgame felt very video gamey, but was executed perfectly. No parts of the dialogue stood out as making my toes curl, so that also puts it way ahead of other movies in its genre.
1	Tjekhov	60 _54th
Story; so so. Israel? incredible.
1	Wezzo	53 _6th
Disappointing, uninvolving blockbuster-by-numbers.
1	doughbaron	64 _33rd
There seems to be very little difference between World War Z and a video game. Practically invincible protagonist with superior skills, check. Random locations with little cohesion in plot, check. Wooden, stereotypical supporting characters, check. Still somewhat entertaining for the pure spectacle, check.
1	Matthew Parkinson (CineMarter)	40 _31st
World War Z is a paid-for vacation for Brad Pitt to visit a bunch of exotic locations and then work on his cardio has he runs away from "zombies," leaving millions of people to die. The film is as generic as can be, and strays so far from the "fresh" book that one has to wonder why they even secured the rights to its story. The family is superfluous, Pitt's boring, and the entire movie isn't worth seeing.
1	stuie299	65 _22nd
An entertaining summer blockbuster but nothing more. Basically the audience gets random set pieces and vague plot points for Brad Pitt to fight zombies. Even with a PG-13 rating it still retains the ability to create suspense. But like I said its a summer blockbuster. There's a lot of unexplored depth to this film and given the source material it should have been a lot better.
1	thegreyfox	45 _16th
World War ZZZzzz is so chock full of cliches, stereotypical characters, wooden acting, lousy voice recording, shaky camera work to hide whats going on, daft plot holes, hideous story arc & telegraphed character actions that even the brilliant special effects, set pieces & scenery cannot make this twitching corpse of a movie into anything half decent. The final scene was just nauseatingly Hollywood, and the worst part was the totally unnecessary exposition and tags. "Jerusalem, Israel" really?
1	guy piranha	60 _40th
Nerds pay money for nerdy stuff. Nerds like zombies. We like money. World War Z.
1	NothingsGood	70 _74th
The zombies are almost too threatening, making the encounters extremely limited and scattered. When they do wreak havoc, it's tense and horrifying, but almost unbelievable anyone would survive. Too many deus ex machinas to be great. Too many genuinely thrilling moments to be considered bad.
1	DougieD	60 _23rd
A decent zombie action movie with intense set-pieces and a shallow plot. It works well enough as a popcorn movie until the final act, when the movie slows to a crawl before tying things up in a convenient plot twist.
1	eCitizen	70 _70th
This might be the best zombie apocalypse movie yet made. Brad Pitt gives and excellent performance as the investigator tracking the source of the outbreak. Filled with memorable moments and twists. Riveting and exciting, keeps you on the edge of your seat. Nice mix of heartwarming and terrifying moments. However, those zombies had super human speed, strength, collective intelligence and ability to perceive deadly illness, which was just too weird. High production quality, and amazing music.
1	comepelicula	30 _12th
This movie is awful, it's just a very big budget action movie taking itself too seriously with an absurd story, there is no character development at all, they all seem so painfully flat except for the zombies they were cool trying to kill all these annoying characters. I think Marc Forster is trying to convert us all into brainless zombies with his stupid movies.
1	hotsake	70 _74th
It's pretty good but misses it's chance to be really great. It has it's share of flaws but to me at least, the biggest one is the fact that the main character Gerry always escapes "sole survivor syndrome". I hate it when everything revolves around one person who can do no wrong and always survives and is the only reason anyone else does either. Not one other person can figure this shit out aside from him.
1	grimes	65 _23rd
a pretty effective summer blockbuster zombie flick; nothing done particularly well, including acting, dialogue and plot; managed to be suspenseful though
1	MacSwell	30 _6th
Sharing very little with the source material, this zombie movie wholly lets down fans of the text and the genre. The plot is hard to swallow, as Brad Pitt jets from country to country only narrowly avoiding death while thousands around him perish. The monsters themselves are impressive in certain grand-scale scenes, created with some neat special effects, but the acting is lacklustre, the violence too tame, and the narrative not at all engaging.
1	seenmany	90 _84th
little scary, but thriller and good

Displaying 1 to 250 of 289 total ratings: Prev | Next

Average Percentile 38.47% from 5697 Ratings