Wrath of Man (2021)

The plot follows H, a cold and mysterious character working at a cash truck company responsible for moving hundreds of millions of dollars around Los Angeles each week. (imdb)
Cast and Information
Directed By: Guy Ritchie
Written By: Guy Ritchie, Ivan Atkinson, Marn Davies
Starring: Eddie Marsan, Andy Garcia, Jason Statham, Josh Hartnett, Holt McCallany, Jeffrey Donovan, Scott Eastwood, Laz Alonso, Niamh Algar
Genres: Suspense/Thriller, Action
Loading...


Wrath of Man belongs to 8 collections
1. Vigilante / Revenge (collaborative: moderated by td888 - 13 stars)
2. Films available in HD (collaborative: moderated by kubricksucks - 12 stars)
3. #1 at the US Box Office (collaborative: moderated by BeeDub - 10 stars)
4. British director (collaborative: moderated by iconogassed - 1 star)
5. Available on Divicast (collaborative: moderated by Dunstan-xxx)
6. Laptop (public: Jason212)
7. 2020s Films (public: MacSwell)
8. Giltiga 2021-filmer (public: caffe)
Browse the full list of collections
Stars | User | Rating | |
3 | ![]() |
Corbad | 45 10th |
NEVER has a silly movie taken itself SO SERIOUSLY. Guy "Scared of Women" Ritchie steals the boogieman speeches from John Wick and applies them to a fun-sucked colourless affair of grinding cellos, pretentious chapter titles, and paceless gun violence. Struggling vets are the villains, for goodness' sake, and the protag is a criminal overlord, yet at no point is there a shade of greyonly disappointment when Statham isn't the one to mercilessly kill them all. Unreal.
|
|||
2 | ![]() |
BillyShears | 70 53rd |
Everyone in this movie has dumb nicknames: Boy Sweat Dave but there’s one character who should’ve been called Obvious Villain it takes any sense of mystery out of the movie, the moment they mention it could’ve been an inside job “yeah that guy 100%, I don’t even work here and know it would be that guy. This is would’ve been a fine Tuesday cheap night movie - the Jason Statham special
|
|||
2 | ![]() |
Luna6ix | 69 32nd |
A watchable action thriller, it's a little confusing and is mostly in step with what Statham has been doing for about twenty years now. Funny how Statham is being type cast even by Ritchie, the guy who gave him a chance in the first place. Honestly, I've lost faith in Ritchie, he seems to have left his identity in England. I think we can blame Madonna, she ruined him.
|
|||
2 | ![]() |
Ofterdingen | 68 71st |
The mean, lean approach is great. Guy Ritchie is more than welcome to stick to one genre at the time in the future.
|
|||
2 | ![]() |
goremeat | 60 43rd |
WoM is like randomly catching a serialised product midway through on TV, getting intrigued enough to watch from the start of the show, but then ultimately feeling like you didn't really need to watch it at all. It unravels is an expected way, but with expected plots of used tropes. Dark, cool, plenty of Statham, it's solid. Definitely worth a watch.
|
|||
2 | ![]() |
mattorama12 | 66 51st |
Not really what I was expecting from a Ritchie movie. Lacked the humor and the visuals/style was a little rough around the edges with some odd choices. But it's good as a straightforward crime/suspense flick. Statham can only ever be Statham, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
|
|||
1 | ![]() |
TheDenizen | 60 40th |
For a Guy Ritchie heist flick, it's pretty disappointing. After the first 4 or 5 minutes, I made a series of predictions about the plot out loud to a friend who was watching with me, and I got almost everything right. It's a bang average by-the-numbers heist movie that doesn't do anything new or interesting but serves as a perfectly passable way to kill a couple of hours. Statham in particular seems wasted in a role with almost no snappy dialog or hand to hand fight scenes.
|
|||
1 | ![]() |
Vandelay1 | 45 45th |
worth a watch
|
|||
1 | ![]() |
Obdurate | 90 91st |
The soundtrack is awesome and often times helps build tension incredibly well, plus there's an awesome remix or two in there. Statham does Statham but is given a well written script to work with, even if not a lot is expected of him. Aside from the music, the plot is the strength; handles the revenge plot well while also having a bunch of twists and turns to keep it interesting. Not the flashiest Ritchie, but a Ritchie who understands the fundamentals and lets the narrative breathe.
|
|||
1 | ![]() |
Dakota99 | 7 77th |
Guy Ritchie is one of the more interesting directors today, and he adds another very solid film to his resume. Wrath of Man doesn't revolutionize the action/heist genre, and you'll probably hear it frequently compared to Casino, Heat, The Town, etc. but it is well made, and it has those weird Guy Ritchie quirks you'd expect. Which feels kinda weird, because this movie is darker than most of his films, and the story presentation is a little different than most. But again, very solid.
|
|||
1 | ![]() |
Yiannos | 58 41st |
Ritchie overdoes the dirge and uses a time shifting, multiple perspective approach to narrative to disguise the simplicity of the story. How viewers respond will largely depend on how effective or distracting they find this device/gimmick to be. Regardless, despite the forced macho dialogue in the first act, Ritchie largely jettisons his usual theatrics, fake style and 'laddism' for gritty hard boiled action that results in the grimmest genre entry since Dragged Across Concrete.
|
Average Percentile 46.61% from 686 Ratings | ![]() |