Statistics: Posted by coffee — Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:31 pm
Statistics: Posted by LEAVES — Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:16 pm
SpikyCactus wrote:advance knowledge can enhance […] but for others, such as film's with unexpected twists, the reverse is more likely to be true, as the surprise is already known about.
Statistics: Posted by livelove — Tue Oct 08, 2019 4:55 am
Statistics: Posted by SpikyCactus — Mon Oct 07, 2019 11:10 am
In the world of movies, we encounter a similar effect sometimes:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics) wrote:In physics, the observer effect is the theory that the mere observation of a phenomenon inevitably changes that phenomenon.
Even good movies can be watched to death:SpikyCactus @ viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7815#p68771 wrote:if I've watched a film before (and can remember anything about it), then the fact I've seen it before will colour how good I think it is on the second or subsequent viewings. Some movies can be seen again and again without really seeming to be better or worse, whilst others lose a lot of their impact after the first time, or actually get better on repeated viewings.
chmul_cr0n @ viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5506#p67076 wrote:they became stale, because they weren't meant to be watched 30 million times...
livelove @ viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5506#p52354 wrote:because you already know some spoilers, so for the category of movies that rely heavily on suspense, you won't be that excited any more the second time you watch it, since you already know what happens, including the movie's major twists and turns. […] the excitement of seeing something completely new, fresh and never-seen-before is gone (almost by definition) the 2nd time you see it. So IMO rating a movie on second sight is bound to yield a distorted rating.
Statistics: Posted by livelove — Wed Sep 25, 2019 2:04 am