Search found 2 matches: Ashley Judd

Searched query: ashley judd

by theficionado
Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:24 am
Forum: Movie-Specific
Topic: Guess they'll turn anything into a movie now.
Replies: 18
Views: 8935

Re: Guess they'll turn anything into a movie now.

Pickpocket wrote:Yeah. I also might respect him more if he wrote his own stuff but he just takes other people's scripts and shoots them. He's not even creative enough to come up with his own ideas.

Goddammit, I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not. But in case it isn't, what about Hitchcock or Scorsese, whose best films were written by other people? It's not as though you can't be an auteur without coming up with your own stuff. (Note: This is not intended by me to be a defense of Ridley Scott. Though Blade Runner is self-evidently awesome.) If this is sarcasm, please ignore.

stain wrote:Probably the same thing Werner Herzog gets out of remaking one of his own movies as a fiction film with name actors (Rescue Dawn), then remaking Bad Lieutenant... and that Robert Benton received by making The Human Stain, which is quite unlike anything he's ever done... and that Philip Kaufman received by making that risible Ashley Judd thriller Twisted (also out of character, for him). I think of this whole subgenre of film as "401K movies".

I doubt very much that Rescue Dawn was meant to contribute to Herzog's retirement fund, and the only reason the Bad Lieutenant brand was attached to Herzog's new film was because the studio mandated it; it isn't a remake. And to be fair, The Human Stain is based on a hell of a book... I think that might have been a pet project that simply went awry.
by Stain
Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:04 pm
Forum: Movie-Specific
Topic: Guess they'll turn anything into a movie now.
Replies: 18
Views: 8935

Re: Guess they'll turn anything into a movie now.

miss jesus wrote:Go to IMDB and look at how many projects Ridley Scott has in development. Then scroll down and see those other ones that are 'announced' under each of his categories. I don't believe for a minute that out of all those, he's gonna choose to spend his time on Monopoly, especially when the premise they've developed for it is so awful, and so unlike anything Scott has ever done. First they said "Scott is doing it and he has this Blade Runner-like idea for a high-stakes future world of financial gaming," and then they said "it's this movie about a Monopoly champion who wakes up one morning to find himself in Monopoly World, where he has to play King Monopoly and win or some shit to get back to his own world" complete with these painfully whimsical details they'd envisioned of him buying a latte and only finding monopoly money in his pocket, and seeing a wheelbarrow when he goes outside. I call BS on Scott getting into this garbage. I think the studios know that people are snickering and "whaaaa?"-ing about this whole Hasbro deal and they're just saying anything they can to spin it. What Scott gets out of going along with this, I have no idea.


Probably the same thing Werner Herzog gets out of remaking one of his own movies as a fiction film with name actors (Rescue Dawn), then remaking Bad Lieutenant... and that Robert Benton received by making The Human Stain, which is quite unlike anything he's ever done... and that Philip Kaufman received by making that risible Ashley Judd thriller Twisted (also out of character, for him). I think of this whole subgenre of film as "401K movies".

This is one of the reasons why I'm not such a director-centric flickhead like I once was, and why nowadays I find sites like Criticker so useful.