FarCryss wrote:there's no one way to go about finding movies. you have your way. i have my way. the true way does not exist. stop being a communist
Strawman followed by ad hominem.
FarCryss wrote:also, your assumption that directors are sexless and genitals are of no consequence seems a little strange. for example, to say that sarah jacabson's genitals, or catherine breillat's genitals, are of no consequence to their style and work is just hilarious to me. you'd understand if you saw their movies, though
Their genitals are only a part of their overall style. Just like genitals were a small part of Fellini's or Ken Russell's works. Or are you arguing that everyone with a vagina makes similar sexual movies, or thinks about sex the same way? That would be a little too stupid even by your standards.
lisagirl wrote:btw, all this nonsense about genitals and stuff.
You mean this entire topic?
lisagirl wrote:but some films are obviously directed by women.
You sure that's not confirmation bias talking?
If I didn't know who the respective directors were, I would guess that The Hurt Locker was directed by a man and The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant was made by a woman. And I would be wrong on both scores.