It doesn't help that my registered party are a bunch of idiots, whose policies scare me to death. They all think they want another Ronald Reagan, but forget Reagan was the one who signed the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act. They think Christianity is under attack while (Cain, Cain, Cain) refusing to acknowledge the bigotry in their treatment of Islam. You thought Bush was a bad public speaker: see Rick Perry. Mitt Romney is the kind of Used Car Salesman who will sell you a cheap lemon and not tell you about the interest rate on your Backruptcy OK Car Loan: his stated records on gun control, immigration and abortion tell you he's the kind of guy who will change his mind at will (of lobbyists and funders), talk out of his ass and shit out of his mouth. Bachmann could use some truth serum. In this intellectual vacuum Paul's theories actually make sense, but he doesn't have a chance in hell of being elected with the chronic lack of media attention and policies that alienate "necessary" political backers.
You leave Newt out on purpose? I'm beginning to wonder if he isn't the most viable candidate the Republican Party's had since Reagan (and I'd like a Reagan, I'm sure he'd come around on immigration, nobody's perfect). Newt's the smartest guy in either room, he'd pulverize Obama in a debate, and he's the one who's remained focused on the prize, finding the best candidate to replace Obama. It was him who said in the first (I think) debate that any of the Rep. candidates would be much better than Obama. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamen!
And George Clooney is a pompous ass.
???? Not disagreeing, but you might elaborate.