FarCryss wrote:Shogun, Spike Jonze isn't trying to predict the future, so what's possible or impossible is besides the point.
It's very much the point. If the future he depicts is utter nonsense, particularly with regards to the AI and technology, and never going to occur, then the central romance becomes even less relevant and more dull.
And considering the romance isn't much to begin with, that's bad. As one reviewer correctly pointed out, it's a standard chick flick love story. Only difference being that Samantha is a robot. And the ending is slightly different. Everything else is the same (a cliche) as a bad Hollywood romance for housewives.
FarCryss wrote:Let me put it this way: Foxes can't really talk and they generally don't issue out noble wisdom to strangers, but intelligent talking Foxes are important characters in Aesop's Fables. Does this mean Aesop's Fables are fucking retarded, because obviously foxes can't talk? Well, no, that's ridiculous. < dick comment, but it makes my point well enough.
Ah, but Aesop's Fables were
-Entertaining. Her is frequently dull.
-Short and to the point. Her is a 30 minute idea stretched out to 2 hours.
-Most importantly, everything EXCEPT for the "foxes can talk" bit made sense. In Her, half the important shit is laughably absurd, besides the idea that AI are magic and can think for themselves.