Search found 3886 matches

This has been on our radar for awhile, and we do hope to get something along the lines implemented soon. So don't worry -- we are aware of how popular this idea is

We don't make estimates on when we might get to new features, (for reasons we went into here) but it is definitely in our system, along with the other suggestions made in this thread.

Are you still having this problem, or has anyone else experienced it? I was able to number both the particular items you mention.

Let me know, and we'll look into it further.

Okay, we've reproduced this issue and I think we understand why it's happening. A fix will be coming along soon.

Thanks for reporting it!

This has been fixed for a little while... thanks again for reporting it!

Pickpocket wrote:I think this happened because they transferred the rankings from 'Loose Change' to 'Second Edition' which caused some errors.

Yeah, that's the reason... though I really wish it was a conspiracy theory!

The data's been cleaned up ... thanks for pointing this out.

There should be a number there, yes... I've verified it for myself in a couple tests. Could you let me know exactly on which profile this is happening for you? Or is it all of them? Send an email to support-at-criticker.com with the information. This is how it should look: "In order to generate...

Sorry it took awhile to get to this! We actually fixed this issue a few days back, so the gender is now correct. Sorry about that!!

Thanks for the idea about Google Buzz! We do want to expand the kinds of "social media" things we're doing, so we'll look into this. Criticker is not open-source, but we are planning on one day bringing on additional development help... we're not there yet, but once we start looking for he...

Yeah, it was only "fixing" the first appearance of the plus sign. This has been corrected now. Thanks!