this is not the only time i've seen this, but here's the most recent example :
it bugs the crap out of me when i look at the listings of actors and the top of the list held by a supporting actor who is lesser known than people farther down the list. i feel like the top positions should be held by the starring actors, then supporting actors. spall had minimal screen time, sturgess and dunst are listed first on the imdb page.
Do we have an actor misspelled, or the wrong summary for a film? Alert us to errors & discuss conflicts here.
This is something we've had on our plate for a long time -- a better way to reorganize the list of actors. Right now, we agree that it's pretty haphazard. While we can organize them one-by-one, it's a painstaking process, and we're hoping to get a utility running soon that will make this easier.