"Rio 2"

For posts related to a specific film -- beware of spoilers o ye who dareth enter!
hellboy76
Posts: 446
6339 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:53 am

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by hellboy76 »

I think most of us are slightly insane. Just sayin'. Also the phrase porky strumpets is a very very good one. This should be a movie into (unto, onto?) itself, if it isn't already taken by third class pornograpghy.

Stewball
Posts: 3009
2188 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:18 pm

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by Stewball »

ShogunRua wrote:By the way, what is that a picture of?


O c'mon now, I know you can tell what that is. The question is what it was, and I'm pretty sure you could figure that out too.

Rufflesack wrote:Rio 2? More like Avatar 2. Jesus Christ
.

No, Rio 2 is mild in comparison. Avatar is to prepare the faithful to face possible deprogramming interventions. Who knows what 2 will be, probably the Second Coming of Karl Marx, where people (who didn't know that rabid environmentalism is lefty communism) will replace the Jesus statue in Rio with one of Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, mmm); and then in their enraptured frenzy jump off mountain.

What you wanna bet a lot of people will see the light before they let Barry pull a Jim Jones on 'em: "Aw hell, I's just joshin' y'all. I knew it was bullshit all along, just goin' along with the herd...erm, or whatever a group of lemmings is called."

I think most of us are slightly insane
.

Speak for yourself. :roll:

Also the phrase porky strumpets is a very very good one.


Thank you.

This should be a movie into (unto, onto?) itself


It's "unto".

.... if it isn't already taken by third class pornograpghy.


Well, the strumpet part might not be totally fair to Miss Hendricks--but she probably would take the money and do it, which is OK by me. 8-) I believe the title is probably available, but I'm not gonna wander the sewers and septic tanks of our great culture just to make sure. But just in case: Porky Strumpets ®. There, so now if Christina wants to do it, she's gonna have to come for me.

® to Toboso Publishing LLC, all rights reserved. ;)

ShogunRua
Posts: 3449
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 3:18 am

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by ShogunRua »

Stewball wrote:
ShogunRua wrote:By the way, what is that a picture of?


O c'mon now, I know you can tell what that is. The question is what it was, and I'm pretty sure you could figure that out too.


No, I genuinely can't. That's why I asked you the question. Sometimes, you need to take people's statements at face value, Stewie.

Stewball wrote:Well, the strumpet part might not be totally fair to Miss Hendricks--but she probably would take the money and do it, which is OK by me. 8-) I believe the title is probably available, but I'm not gonna wander the sewers and septic tanks of our great culture just to make sure. But just in case: Porky Strumpets ®. There, so now if Christina wants to do it, she's gonna have to come for me.


Naturally, Stewie would be way more into Anorexic Strumpets, Wooden Plank Strumpts, and even Starving War Orphan Strumpets. No breasts or ass allowed!

Anomaly
Posts: 472
1894 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 5:21 pm

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by Anomaly »

You have to be insane to post on internet forums, it's a requirement.

mattorama12
Posts: 887
3086 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:05 am

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by mattorama12 »

ShogunRua wrote:
Stewball wrote:
ShogunRua wrote:By the way, what is that a picture of?


O c'mon now, I know you can tell what that is. The question is what it was, and I'm pretty sure you could figure that out too.


No, I genuinely can't. That's why I asked you the question. Sometimes, you need to take people's statements at face value, Stewie.


The picture looks to be piles of broken glass. I believe he's saying that you, Shogun, live in a glass house and shouldn't be casting stones.

Stewball
Posts: 3009
2188 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:18 pm

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by Stewball »

Anomaly1 wrote:You have to be insane to post on internet forums, it's a requirement.


You don't have to be insane to post, but to expect a rational response from more than 10% would be itself irrational.

ShogunRua wrote:No, I genuinely can't. That's why I asked you the question. Sometimes, you need to take people's statements at face value, Stewie.


And sometimes acting ignorant is one's only defense. I dare say you're the only one who can't recognize that as a picture of broken glass. And a further clue to it's meaning was my question inquiring, "you under there somewhere", implying this is your very own pile of broken glass. Now, do you still not know what I'm talking about?

Naturally, Stewie would be way more into Anorexic Strumpets, Wooden Plank Strumpts, and even Starving War Orphan Strumpets. No breasts or ass allowed!


Oh dear me, are any of these anorexic, wooden planks, starving war orphans, breastless and assless? Oh dear Lord throw me into that briar patch pleeeeeeez:

Image
Image
Image
Now Scarlett, bless her heart, did veer off in to portly/porkly territory a few years ago, and even defended doing so--but she came to her senses later.

Image
Image
Image
Image

Second place I look (after the face) is the waist.
It was fun collecting these. Who has fun trolling bowling alley's with an ear of corn for porkers?
Last edited by Stewball on Fri Apr 18, 2014 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cagedwisdom
Posts: 827
2090 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:44 pm

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by cagedwisdom »

Why is every thread eventually about which women are hotter. This is getting bizarre now.

mattorama12
Posts: 887
3086 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:05 am

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by mattorama12 »

Rufflesack wrote:Why is every thread eventually about which women are hotter. This is getting bizarre now.


Shogun has ongoing disputes with 3ish members of the forum, and nearly every thread that makes it past 10 posts involves one of those disputes playing itself out. Here, you're seeing the Shogun/Stewie voluptuous/thin dispute play itself out again.

It may sound like I'm complaining, but I'm not. Though I tend to side more with Stewie on this particular issue, I won't be complaining if Shogun shows up with some evidence of his own in the form of Christina Hendricks or otherwise.

Stewball
Posts: 3009
2188 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:18 pm

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by Stewball »

Rufflesack wrote:Why is every thread eventually about which women are hotter. This is getting bizarre now.


It's not every thread, just that lately material is getting pretty thin here--for which I take a share of the blame as much as the rest should.....well....mebbe not. But then there's the issue that if it weren't for a couple of semi-film themes didn't arise, there wouldn't be must to digest.

Shogun has ongoing disputes with 3ish members of the forum, and nearly every thread that makes it past 10 posts involves one of those disputes playing itself out. Here, you're seeing the Shogun/Stewie voluptuous/thin dispute play itself out again.


Yeah, and who'du thunk fat vs. svelte would ever become an issue, which your,

It may sound like I'm complaining, but I'm not. Though I tend to side more with Stewie on this particular issue,


exemplifies.

I won't be complaining if Shogun shows up with some evidence of his own in the form of Christina Hendricks or otherwise.


The only relevant evidence would be something like this early photograph:
Image

There's even a whole collection of before and after photos on Google images. I'm not trying to be mean, I mean damn....she was hot, and she could be still.

Spunkie
Posts: 473
5477 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:47 am

Re: "Rio 2"

Post by Spunkie »

Keep rockin' on, I wasn't entertained by a thread as much for sometime. To hell with Rio.

Post Reply