Deepwater Horizon (2016)

500 character mini-reviews cramping your style? Share your thoughts in full in this forum!
ikkegoemikke
Posts: 654
4293 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 3:31 pm

Deepwater Horizon (2016)

Post by ikkegoemikke »

Image

"The Runner" was about a congressman who tried to provide financial support for local fisheries after the BP oil spill. "Deepwater Horizon" displays in a consistent manner the pure facts on the day of the fatal accident with this oil platform. It could have been just another disaster movie, like I've seen a lot before. Full of heroism, spectacular scenes and emotionally charged images of families at home, waiting for some good news. Ultimately, it wasn't that kind of a movie. They managed to make a film without any Hollywoodian, exaggerated situations. In short, no tricks to make it more spectacular in terms of action and emotions. It's an accurate reporting of the facts that took place before and during the disaster. Sometimes I feel like watching an action-soaked disaster film where people end up in a very explosive situation, both literally and figuratively. On the other hand, I would have enjoyed a piece about the aftermath of this disaster as well.

As in any disaster movie we get to see two different groups of people with opposing opinions. First we have those who predict the danger and who tried to point out to the others what consequences will result from making rash decisions. And then there's the other party rejecting any danger and trying to nip any protest in the bud, which ensures that the whole situation derails. In the group of individuals who are using common sense and where safety is top-priority, we find Jimmy Harrell (Kurt Russell) and Mike Williams (Mark Wahlberg). Harrell is a hardened foreman on the rig, who insists on checking the cement layer that'll protect the rig against a blow out. You don't have to be a genius to know this test isn't carried out properly and what consequences it'll bring. Mike Williams is the technician who's responsible to make sure everything that needs to function will function perfectly (including the toilets). It's no surprise he transforms into the person who keeps his nerve when the trouble begins and acts in an effective way to prevent worse.

The sad thing about films like "Deepwater Horizon", is that the outcome is already known in advance. It's quite annoying when your wife peeks around the corner once again and calmly asks the same question over and over again : "And? Is it already happening?". But isn't that the moment you're waiting for in the first place? The moment the mayhem starts? The prelude only has an educational purpose (with a can of Coke explaining how drilling oil from an platform works) and merely serves to gradually build up the tension. When hell breaks loose, you'll witness a chain of explosions with such destructive force that walls, iron structures and workmen literally fly away in all directions. There's nothing so annoying as when you're enjoying a refreshing shower and the wall blows up right in your face with broken glass and twisted iron leaving a trail of destruction and death. That's what some of the crew members experienced the first minute.

Mark Wahlberg plays a terrific part as the indifferent technician Mike, who isn't is impressed by the rather authoritarian tone used by the big shots from BP. I'm not Wahlberg's biggest fan, but now I felt like this was a suitable role for him. Ditto regarding Kurt Russell who stands his ground against these BP representatives. John Malkovich (who I always will remember as the provoking Russian poker-player Teddy KGB in "Rounders") plays the arrogant, pedantic BP man who at first acts extremely haughty and self-confident. But when the sh*t hits the fan, he runs off like a scaredy-cat, realizing he escaped a certain death. He looked like one of these male passengers who sneaked in the rescue boats with the women and children when the Titanic hit that giant ice cube. Pathetic.

Don't expect much profundity in this movie. No blame directed towards the managers of BP whose only concern is to make a profit. That's more important to them than the safety of the staff. No epilogue in which these bozos are held responsible for one of the largest environmental disasters ever. And no real character development when talking about the main characters. The only goal they had in mind, was to escape from the flames and survive. But the special effects, action sequences and nail-biting race against the clock will blow you away. Exactly what the crew experienced.

More reviews here : http://bit.ly/1KIdQMT

nauru
Posts: 515
1667 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:41 am

Re: Deepwater Horizon (2016)

Post by nauru »

Nice write up.

Personally I was really impressed with this film. I also happen to be a huge fan of Mark Wahlberg as a performer so I was almost certain I'd enjoy this.

I was fine with the lack of discussion about the environmental impact since I feel like that story has been told over and over again in the news media. The experience of the people who worked on that rig, however, was entirely unknown to me and in my opinion was not covered well at all in the news. So strong was the media focus on environmental and economic impact of the disaster, that before watching this film I wasn't aware that quite a few workers actually died in the explosions and ensuing fire. I also didn't know anything about life on a rig, or that there is a drill cage where workers risk their lives every day since they have absolutely no protection from a blow out (from this film, my understanding is that everyone in the drill cage was killed).

In my view, the film does a fantastic job of recounting the disaster from the perspective of the roughnecks, a perspective that's been badly neglected in my opinion. In terms of production value this is as good as it gets. I also appreciated the lack of heroism or love story. It's just people trying to survive, and the visuals/audio seem completely real, to the point where you forget you're watching a movie.

Stewball
Posts: 3009
2188 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:18 pm

Re: Deepwater Horizon (2016)

Post by Stewball »

nauru wrote:I was fine with the lack of discussion about the environmental impact since I feel like that story has been told over and over again in the news media.


People forget they were forecasting a major, long-lasting disaster, but the ocean bugs pretty much ate the sludge up. Those microbes are there all the time eating up oil coming from natural leaks in the ocean floor, a lot of oil. When the source plumes, like it did with Deepwater, so do the microbes. For some reason, good news reporting never matches the crisis news in the media, especially when there's a political component. EVERYBODY knew about the disaster (and I'm not down playing it), but I bet only 10% know the rest of the story.

Say hello to the unsung heroes:

Image

Post Reply