Mutual Kumpels
- garethm
- Posts: 36
- 453 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 3:48 pm
Mutual Kumpels
I've suggested this before a long time ago but it hasn't been taken up but I would like to ask again is it possible to see who has added me as a Kumpel. I'm not a great review writer but I like to say something about each film and would be interested if anyone out there is paying any attention.
- TheDenizen
- Posts: 1638
- 3114 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: Mutual Kumpels
I fully support this notion, it'd be nice to see who likes us
- TheDenizen
- Posts: 1638
- 3114 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 12:51 pm
Re: Mutual Kumpels
bump for consideration.
-
- Your TCI: na
Re: Mutual Kumpels
"Mutual Kumpels" sounds like a feature that would show which, if any, Kumpels a user you are looking at shares with you, not who has put you as a Kumpel.
Both of those are good ideas, tho.
Both of those are good ideas, tho.
- mpowell
- Posts: 3894
- 1201 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am
Re: Mutual Kumpels
This one is still in our list... from 2008! Sorry for the length of time it's taking to arrive at, but we haven't forgotten.
- MacSwell
- Posts: 1724
- 2722 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:03 am
Re: Mutual Kumpels
Thought I'd give this feature request a bump. I reckon most users would like to see who has selected them as a kumpel (I know I would!).
- philamental
- Posts: 1413
- 1717 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 8:56 pm
Re: Mutual Kumpels
For the record, I'm delighted with the anonymity of being able to add someone as a kumpel without them knowing, so in turn it doesn't bother me that I can't see who has added me. I don't want to see criticker turn in to some sort of weak social media site where you're flooded with 'x has added you as a kumpel' notifications, and there's an etiquette pressure to add them back. I realise I'm probably pissing in the wind here to leave things as is, but that's my view for what it's worth.
- iconogassed
- Posts: 920
- 7286 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:41 pm
Re: Mutual Kumpels
philamental wrote:For the record, I'm delighted with the anonymity of being able to add someone as a kumpel without them knowing, so in turn it doesn't bother me that I can't see who has added me. I don't want to see criticker turn in to some sort of weak social media site where you're flooded with 'x has added you as a kumpel' notifications, and there's an etiquette pressure to add them back. I realise I'm probably pissing in the wind here to leave things as is, but that's my view for what it's worth.
Agree with all of this. Criticker is unique among sites of its kind in not embracing social media's perversion (purification?) of community and I hope it remains that way
- MacSwell
- Posts: 1724
- 2722 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:03 am
Re: Mutual Kumpels
philamental wrote:For the record, I'm delighted with the anonymity of being able to add someone as a kumpel without them knowing, so in turn it doesn't bother me that I can't see who has added me. I don't want to see criticker turn in to some sort of weak social media site where you're flooded with 'x has added you as a kumpel' notifications, and there's an etiquette pressure to add them back. I realise I'm probably pissing in the wind here to leave things as is, but that's my view for what it's worth.
You make some good points. My opinion has been swayed considerably!
-
- Your TCI: na
Re: Mutual Kumpels
philamental wrote:For the record, I'm delighted with the anonymity of being able to add someone as a kumpel without them knowing, so in turn it doesn't bother me that I can't see who has added me. I don't want to see criticker turn in to some sort of weak social media site where you're flooded with 'x has added you as a kumpel' notifications, and there's an etiquette pressure to add them back. I realise I'm probably pissing in the wind here to leave things as is, but that's my view for what it's worth.
Also agreeing with this.