Collections can be sorted by: name, update time, and stars.
suggestion: could you make the other column headers (collection owner, "films", "seen", and "avg") clickable as well ?
thank you.
[noted] more sorting options for collections
- livelove
- Posts: 759
- 67 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:36 pm
[noted] more sorting options for collections
Last edited by livelove on Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
- mpowell
- Posts: 3851
- 1201 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am
Re: more sorting options for collections
We can think about this one. I can't remember exactly why we left some possible options un-sortable, but if memory serves it had something to do with speed. We'll revisit this, next time we revamp this page.
- livelove
- Posts: 759
- 67 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:36 pm
Re: more sorting options for collections
that would be great. thank youmpowell wrote:We can think about this one. We'll revisit this, next time we revamp this page.
- livelove
- Posts: 759
- 67 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:36 pm
Re: [noted] more sorting options for collections
I can see that occurring if you recalculated the Avg% column. But couldn't you sort that column without recalculating? Other than that I can't really see a speed issue or any other difference between sorting by numbers vs alphabetically by name, especially since you already allow sorting by date and by #stars.mpowell wrote:I can't remember exactly why we left some possible options un-sortable, but if memory serves it had something to do with speed.