Criticker dismiss a film as a TV episode

Ideas to improve Criticker and new feature requests, as well as announcements about new enhancements.
livelove
Posts: 623
66 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: Criticker dismiss a film as a TV episode

Post by livelove »

medium pizza wrote:
gabba2k7 wrote:
mpowell wrote:

hi there. will u read some other suggestions ? :?

Don't be an ass. You are not entitled to a speedy response to your "suggestions" (and just because they haven't been responded to yet doesn't mean they haven't been read). This site requires a lot of work to maintain and it is not the full-time occupation of the admins, who have jobs and families. Stop whining.
come on, pizza. Calm down and be a little nicer. Gabba2k7 just asked.

iconogassed
Posts: 491
6610 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:41 pm

Re: Criticker dismiss a film as a TV episode

Post by iconogassed »

:lol: A rude, pointless, and moronic question whose only purpose was to imply mpowell was neglecting his duties, as taken literally it is plainly absurd, ie. the notion that mpowell would not be reading any more suggestions

livelove
Posts: 623
66 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: Criticker dismiss a film as a TV episode

Post by livelove »

when some threads go unanswered for years, I find it understandable that such questions are asked and IMO it's perfectly ok if they are not impolite (which they weren't).

Also you seem to make a habit of attacking other Criticker users, which is not very helpful.

iconogassed
Posts: 491
6610 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:41 pm

Re: Criticker dismiss a film as a TV episode

Post by iconogassed »

Not all threads are entitled to a reply, either

That you presumably view as an attack the post in the bad movies thread you sent me that weird PM about says more about you than me

The last word is yours

livelove
Posts: 623
66 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: Criticker dismiss a film as a TV episode

Post by livelove »

Strawman argument, we were obviously talking about threads of merit.

And the PM which you didn't answer was a polite request to stop exactly this kind of off-topic discussion here and personal attacks ("ass", "moronic", …) on your fellow Critickers (gabba, me, others). It's telling you find that weird, but I kindly reiterate that request.

I PMed you to avoid a continuing public discussion with you. It's nonsensical that you don't deign to PM-reply, but talk to me here instead (and even reference the PM), thereby hijacking the thread and causing the distraction, I wanted to avoid by reaching out to you privately. Not very helpful.

Post Reply