Not a bug as such, but I've noticed that it no longer says whether the credits for ranked titles are actor/writer/director. Can this be restored?
See example:
No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
- MacSwell
- Posts: 1721
- 2706 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:03 am
- mpowell
- Posts: 3851
- 1201 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am
Re: No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
Yeah, we simplified this page quite a lot, and thought this might be a little-used feature which nobody would miss.
We've still got the code, and will look into working it back in.
We've still got the code, and will look into working it back in.
- mpowell
- Posts: 3851
- 1201 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am
Re: No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
mpowell wrote:Yeah, we simplified this page quite a lot, and thought this might be a little-used feature which nobody would miss.
We've still got the code, and will look into working it back in.
Actually, now that I start looking into it, it looks like we already had added this back in. I know you included a screenshot, but can you make sure? The three films you've seen from Bob Gale are all screenwriter credits. If there aren't at least two types (actor/director/screenwriter) we don't distinguish between the averages.
- MacSwell
- Posts: 1721
- 2706 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:03 am
Re: No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
mpowell wrote:If there aren't at least two types (actor/director/screenwriter) we don't distinguish between the averages.
But because some actors write/direct, some writers direct, some directors act... if I'd only seen one thing with them in it, it wouldn't necessarily be instantly obvious what their role on the film had been, whereas it was before.
- mpowell
- Posts: 3851
- 1201 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am
Re: No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
Maaxwell wrote:mpowell wrote:If there aren't at least two types (actor/director/screenwriter) we don't distinguish between the averages.
But because some actors write/direct, some writers direct, some directors act... if I'd only seen one thing with them in it, it wouldn't necessarily be instantly obvious what their role on the film had been, whereas it was before.
We'll definitely look into it. It will be a balance between making it more cluttered, versus more clear. The idea was that if you've just seen films in which Filmmaker X was an actor, there's no need to distinguish between anything. But I see what you mean... you might not know that these films are just his acting credits.
- mpowell
- Posts: 3851
- 1201 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am
Re: No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
We've added this information back into the page. Thanks again for pointing it out!
- iconogassed
- Posts: 919
- 7282 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:41 pm
Re: No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
This appears to be happening again/still
- mpowell
- Posts: 3851
- 1201 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am
Re: No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
Thanks for alerting us to this! We'll take another look.
- iconogassed
- Posts: 919
- 7282 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:41 pm
Re: No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
Still frequently getting pages where there is no indication what role the filmmaker had with the productions:
- iconogassed
- Posts: 919
- 7282 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:41 pm
Re: No actor/director/writer for ranked titles
Is this now expected behaviour? I really can't see how these last few examples can be defended on de-cluttering grounds