Gizmodo UK have done up two lists of the most 'controversial' and most 'agreeable' movies based on metacritic scores of 'recent years'. I figure this community would get a kick out of the results based on how obsessed with ranking and tiers we are here
Full article can be read here .... http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2017/11/exclusive-the-most-critically-divisive-films-according-to-data/
For those too lazy to click, here are the lists
Most Critically Divisive
Most Critically Consensual
Gizmodo's most Critically Diverse and Unanimous Lists
- philamental
- Posts: 1413
- 1717 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 8:56 pm
- djross
- Posts: 1214
- 5326 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:56 am
Re: Gizmodo's most Critically Diverse and Unanimous Lists
x
Last edited by djross on Thu Jul 20, 2023 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
- 90sCoffee
- Posts: 173
- 2243 Ratings
- Your TCI: na
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:15 pm
Re: Gizmodo's most Critically Diverse and Unanimous Lists
Something common I notice in a lot of those films like Carol, I Heart Huckabees, Melancholia, and Under The Skin, is that they all have a good premise or a good atmosphere or look good but there's something off about each one (generally the story itself not being good enough). So some of that variation comes from how much a person docks that film for its problems. Huckabees for example was just a mess but I really enjoyed it so I didn't take off too many points while Melancholia's problems were bigger and caused the film to be less enjoyable for me so I gave it a lower rating. I could see someone loving the character dynamic between the two on Carol for example and giving it a 10/10 and not being bothered by the pace or something and another person giving it half that because they don't like the pace.