<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'>
 <channel>
  <title>Criticker: Recent Ratings</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/</link>
  <description>A list of all the films photina has rated at Criticker, ordered by rating date</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2026 06:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
  <language>en</language>
 <item>
  <title>Zootopia (2016) - 85 - 01 Jan 2017</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Zootopia/</link>
  <guid>Zootopia-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Zootopia a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Zootopia.webp?v=1774775062' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Zootopia'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>01 Jan 2017</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Zootopia/'>Zootopia (2016)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 24.1379<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Arrival (2016) - 85 - 01 Jan 2017</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Arrival-2016/</link>
  <guid>Arrival-2016-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Arrival a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Arrival-2016.webp?v=1773666395' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Arrival'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>01 Jan 2017</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Arrival-2016/'>Arrival (2016)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 24.1379<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Moonlight (2016) - 96 - 01 Jan 2017</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Moonlight-2016/</link>
  <guid>Moonlight-2016-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Moonlight a rating of 96</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Moonlight-2016.webp?v=1773731197' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Moonlight'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>01 Jan 2017</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Moonlight-2016/'>Moonlight (2016)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 96<br><b>Percentile:</b> 93.8424<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Captain Fantastic (2016) - 85 - 01 Jan 2017</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Captain-Fantastic/</link>
  <guid>Captain-Fantastic-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Captain Fantastic a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Captain-Fantastic.webp?v=1720621384' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Captain Fantastic'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>01 Jan 2017</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Captain-Fantastic/'>Captain Fantastic (2016)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 24.1379<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Let the Right One In (2008) - 88 - 09 Aug 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Let-the-Right-One-In/</link>
  <guid>Let-the-Right-One-In-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Let the Right One In a rating of 88</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Let-the-Right-One-In.webp?v=1719152766' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Let the Right One In'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Aug 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Let-the-Right-One-In/'>Let the Right One In (2008)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 88<br><b>Percentile:</b> 38.67<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser (1974) - 90 - 09 Aug 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Enigma-of-Kaspar-Hauser/</link>
  <guid>The-Enigma-of-Kaspar-Hauser-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Enigma-of-Kaspar-Hauser.webp?v=1724422832' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Aug 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Enigma-of-Kaspar-Hauser/'>The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser (1974)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 56.8966<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Bruno S. gives one of the most authentic, astonishing performances I&#039;ve seen in film.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Blue Velvet (1986) - 95 - 09 Aug 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Blue-Velvet/</link>
  <guid>Blue-Velvet-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Blue Velvet a rating of 95</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Blue-Velvet.webp?v=1774775070' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Blue Velvet'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Aug 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Blue-Velvet/'>Blue Velvet (1986)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 95<br><b>Percentile:</b> 90.1478<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Café Society (2016) - 79 - 09 Aug 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Cafe-Society-2016/</link>
  <guid>Cafe-Society-2016-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Café Society a rating of 79</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Cafe-Society-2016.webp?v=1722695431' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Café Society'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Aug 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Cafe-Society-2016/'>Café Society (2016)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 79<br><b>Percentile:</b> 10.5911<br><b>Review:</b> <i>On the one hand, this film is sumptuously shot and designed--from the costumes to the production design to the gorgeous photography and buttery lighting. It&#039;s cool to see Allen&#039;s vision of Old Hollywood. The narrative is the problem. The stakes are so low I found it impossible to care. The central couple (Eisenberg and Stewart) have no chemistry at all. The best moments come from the supporting cast. Not one of Allen&#039;s worst, but certainly not one of his best.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Compliance (2012) - 86 - 04 Aug 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Compliance/</link>
  <guid>Compliance-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 4 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Compliance a rating of 86</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Compliance.webp?v=1722868063' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Compliance'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>04 Aug 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Compliance/'>Compliance (2012)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 86<br><b>Percentile:</b> 29.3103<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Still Alice (2014) - 86 - 12 Jul 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Still-Alice/</link>
  <guid>Still-Alice-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Still Alice a rating of 86</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Still-Alice.webp?v=1721313028' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Still Alice'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>12 Jul 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Still-Alice/'>Still Alice (2014)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 86<br><b>Percentile:</b> 29.3103<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Wild Tales (2014) - 89 - 13 Mar 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Wild-Tales/</link>
  <guid>Wild-Tales-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Wild Tales a rating of 89</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Wild-Tales.webp?v=1778058483' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Wild Tales'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Mar 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Wild-Tales/'>Wild Tales (2014)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 89<br><b>Percentile:</b> 45.0739<br><b>Review:</b> <i>A delicious satire on our &quot;revenge society&quot;. Each of the film&#039;s six unconnected vignettes begins plausibly, but absurd coincidences and surprises raise the stakes to red-alert levels. As the tension mounts in each short scene, we realize our own revenge fantasies are being played out before us--and that we&#039;re laughing all the way. It&#039;s brazen, giddy, inventive, and totally engaging.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Gosford Park (2001) - 87 - 09 Mar 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Gosford-Park/</link>
  <guid>Gosford-Park-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Gosford Park a rating of 87</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Gosford-Park.webp?v=1724163647' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Gosford Park'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Mar 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Gosford-Park/'>Gosford Park (2001)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 87<br><b>Percentile:</b> 33.7438<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Snowpiercer (2013) - 82 - 09 Mar 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Snowpiercer/</link>
  <guid>Snowpiercer-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Snowpiercer a rating of 82</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Snowpiercer.webp?v=1717967874' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Snowpiercer'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Mar 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Snowpiercer/'>Snowpiercer (2013)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 82<br><b>Percentile:</b> 16.0099<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Experimenter (2015) - 86 - 09 Mar 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Experimenter/</link>
  <guid>Experimenter-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Experimenter a rating of 86</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Experimenter.webp?v=1738419641' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Experimenter'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Mar 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Experimenter/'>Experimenter (2015)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 86<br><b>Percentile:</b> 29.3103<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Farewell My Concubine (1993) - 90 - 09 Mar 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Farewell-My-Concubine/</link>
  <guid>Farewell-My-Concubine-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Farewell My Concubine a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Farewell-My-Concubine.webp?v=1762190162' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Farewell My Concubine'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Mar 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Farewell-My-Concubine/'>Farewell My Concubine (1993)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 56.8966<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Brooklyn (2015) - 83 - 09 Mar 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Brooklyn/</link>
  <guid>Brooklyn-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Brooklyn a rating of 83</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Brooklyn.webp?v=1721053302' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Brooklyn'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Mar 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Brooklyn/'>Brooklyn (2015)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 83<br><b>Percentile:</b> 18.4729<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Ronan&#039;s performance is quietly excellent. The production design, particularly the muted palette, echoes the structure of the story. Emory Cohen&#039;s performance is exuberant, authentic, and entirely underrated--it&#039;s as good as Ronan&#039;s. It&#039;s a very safe, gentle, contained film, and I didn&#039;t mind.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Turin Horse (2011) - 92 - 14 Feb 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Turin-Horse/</link>
  <guid>The-Turin-Horse-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave The Turin Horse a rating of 92</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Turin-Horse.webp?v=1721571790' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Turin Horse'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>14 Feb 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Turin-Horse/'>The Turin Horse (2011)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 92<br><b>Percentile:</b> 73.399<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Stunning to look at, from the film&#039;s beautiful palette of greys to the compositional artistry in nearly every shot. It&#039;s never boring, always engaging. Its glacial pace creates for the audience an atmosphere of waiting--matched by the characters on screen, who wait for death to slowly, inevitably arrive.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Jackie Brown (1997) - 87 - 14 Feb 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Jackie-Brown/</link>
  <guid>Jackie-Brown-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Jackie Brown a rating of 87</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Jackie-Brown.webp?v=1770625598' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Jackie Brown'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>14 Feb 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Jackie-Brown/'>Jackie Brown (1997)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 87<br><b>Percentile:</b> 33.7438<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Birdman (2014) - 85 - 14 Feb 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Birdman/</link>
  <guid>Birdman-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Birdman a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Birdman.webp?v=1718547440' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Birdman'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>14 Feb 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Birdman/'>Birdman (2014)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 24.1379<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The 39 Steps (1935) - 91 - 14 Feb 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-39-Steps/</link>
  <guid>The-39-Steps-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave The 39 Steps a rating of 91</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-39-Steps.webp?v=1773640936' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The 39 Steps'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>14 Feb 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-39-Steps/'>The 39 Steps (1935)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 91<br><b>Percentile:</b> 68.2266<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Dial M for Murder (1954) - 90 - 14 Feb 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Dial-M-for-Murder/</link>
  <guid>Dial-M-for-Murder-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Dial M for Murder a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Dial-M-for-Murder.webp?v=1773640935' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Dial M for Murder'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>14 Feb 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Dial-M-for-Murder/'>Dial M for Murder (1954)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 56.8966<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>To Catch a Thief (1955) - 88 - 14 Feb 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/To-Catch-a-Thief/</link>
  <guid>To-Catch-a-Thief-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave To Catch a Thief a rating of 88</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/To-Catch-a-Thief.webp?v=1723213047' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='To Catch a Thief'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>14 Feb 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/To-Catch-a-Thief/'>To Catch a Thief (1955)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 88<br><b>Percentile:</b> 38.67<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) - 94 - 14 Feb 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Man-Who-Knew-Too-1956/</link>
  <guid>The-Man-Who-Knew-Too-1956-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave The Man Who Knew Too Much a rating of 94</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Man-Who-Knew-Too-1956.webp?v=1719153014' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Man Who Knew Too Much'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>14 Feb 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Man-Who-Knew-Too-1956/'>The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 94<br><b>Percentile:</b> 85.468<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Psycho (1960) - 94 - 14 Feb 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Psycho/</link>
  <guid>Psycho-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave Psycho a rating of 94</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Psycho.webp?v=1773640928' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Psycho'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>14 Feb 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Psycho/'>Psycho (1960)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 94<br><b>Percentile:</b> 85.468<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Birds (1963) - 93 - 14 Feb 2016</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Birds/</link>
  <guid>The-Birds-photina</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>photina gave The Birds a rating of 93</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Birds.webp?v=1766742404' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Birds'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>14 Feb 2016</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Birds/'>The Birds (1963)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 93<br><b>Percentile:</b> 79.064<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>