The Lion King (2019)
After the murder of his father, a young lion prince flees his kingdom only to learn the true meaning of responsibility and bravery.
Genres: Drama, Family/Kids, Adventure, Animation
Country: USA
Directed By: Jon Favreau
Written By: Jeff Nathanson, Brenda Chapman
Starring: James Earl Jones, Beyoncé, Alfre Woodard, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Seth Rogen, John Kani, John Oliver, Donald Glover, Keegan-Michael Key, Billy Eichner
Loading Products from EbayLoading...
The Lion King belongs to 13 collections
1. Women+ (public: moderated by paulofilmo - 17 stars)
2. Remake (public: moderated by td888 - 8 stars)
3. #1 at the US Box Office (public: moderated by BeeDub - 5 stars)
4. Brothers (public: moderated by djross - 3 stars)
5. Worldwide box office over $500,000,000 (public: moderated by djross - 2 stars)
6. Live-Action Disney Adaptations (public: moderated by Boxcars - 2 stars)
7. father-son relationship (public: moderated by livelove - 2 stars)
8. Worldwide box office over $1,000,000,000 (public: moderated by djross - 1 star)
9. Worldwide box office top 100 (public: moderated by djross - 1 star)
10. Worldwide box office over $750,000,000 (public: moderated by djross)
11. Ten highest-grossing films by worldwide box office (public: moderated by djross)
12. Worldwide box office over $1,500,000,000 (public: moderated by djross)
13. Disney Live-Action (private: jacqueskit)
Browse the full list of collections
| Date | User | Rating | |
| Oct 15 | andrewnguyen | 50 10% |
|
| Oct 14 | LesterGroans | 48 10% |
|
| Oct 14 | yigityilmaz6 | 62 46% |
|
| Oct 13 | JayDee87 | 52 12% |
|
| Oct 13 |  |
AFK (afksinemada.com) | 4 24% |
| Oct 13 | Yeboah | 65 51% |
|
| Oct 13 | kljnsclkn | 70 25% |
|
| Oct 13 | vTf5uk | 70 0% |
|
| Oct 13 | zevel6 | 51 33% |
|
| Oct 13 | Blondone86 | 71 55% |
|
| Oct 13 |  |
jacqueskit | 20 13% |
| Oct 13 | adamorumcek | 80 65% |
|
| Oct 13 | StegSchreck | 60 38% |
|
| Oct 13 |  |
umurtas | 40 27% |
| Oct 13 |  |
oguzhnakkaya | 60 41% |
| Oct 13 |  |
bybrt | 50 26% |
| Oct 13 |  |
pietias231 | 75 54% |
| Oct 13 |  |
Luk92 | 45 13% |
| Oct 13 | jzeitz | 82 67% |
|
| Oct 12 |  |
Blair | 80 40% |
| Oct 12 |  |
Ramy | 40 31% |
| Oct 12 |  |
rlukaku | 70 51% |
| Oct 12 |  |
Korsoh | 65 21% |
| Oct 12 | rootbeercirc | 62 17% |
|
| Oct 12 |  |
amazedemon | 60 22% |
|
I did not enjoy this remake of The Lion King, and that's okay. Technically the animation looks great, but it strips away the emotion present in the anthropomorphised 2D version. The lighting makes the film less vibrant, making it hard to distinguish between Simba & Scar. The voice acting ranges from decent to obnoxious (Beyoncé), and the songs are somehow less memorable. Comparison to the original is inevitable as it's a shot-for-shot remake, with half an hour added to tell you nihilism is bad.
|
|||
| Oct 12 | Jorg | 60 27% |
|
| Oct 12 | danialinho | 58 39% |
|
| Oct 12 | mvsilva | 40 2% |
|
| Oct 12 | spyce | 12 0% |
|
| Oct 12 | PUNQ | 50 78% |
|
|
I love animals, so up my alley. The songs, and I've heard them places before, does little for me. Not my taste. I get the feeling the realistic look takes the experience down a notch. Looses that old Disney charm, which has made their cartoons timeless classics. The life-circle story is evergreen and enchanting. Still, I'm struggling with the realistic conversion holding back the emotional effect of it. Good family film, but the Disney magic has been whitewashed off the experience.
|
|||
| Oct 12 |  |
korbenPL | 44 51% |
| Oct 12 |  |
bridggedale | 70 44% |
| Oct 12 |  |
selingoknar | 73 35% |
| Oct 12 |  |
ikkegoemikke | 69 70% |
| Oct 12 |  |
buddhalou | 50 19% |
| Oct 11 |  |
Guernica | 35 26% |
| Oct 11 | fireroot | 60 46% |
|
| Oct 11 |  |
navid.g | 60 14% |
| Oct 11 | aqamal | 62 28% |
|
| Oct 10 |  |
fatiherdem | 70 57% |
| Oct 01 |  |
mega RUB | 76 27% |
| Sep 30 | Sense1ess | 75 77% |
|
| Sep 30 | bilbo | 0 19% |
|
| Sep 29 | Theo X | 70 19% |
|
| Sep 29 | DNrEub | 70 0% |
|
| Sep 26 |  |
Bondy | 0 4% |
| Sep 25 | razzy8 | 13 16% |
|
| Sep 22 |  |
Delfos | 50 13% |
| Sep 22 | bentien | 65 61% |
|
|
One tough film to rate. Evokes some of the same feelings as the original (mainly because of the nostalgia), but seeing a film that mimics its original in such a way is at the same time superfluous. I liked som of the plot explanations that updated the story to 2019.
|
|||
| Sep 21 | Jonrock411 | 3 8% |
|
| Sep 20 |  |
eleanor | 55 53% |
| Sep 20 |  |
obiden | 60 14% |
| Sep 19 | metalrocker | 55 18% |
|
| Sep 17 | WulfstanLee | 60 52% |
|
| Sep 16 | tubasaxt | 75 32% |
|
|
I liked it, but didn't love it. The look of the film was inconsistent: half the time it felt like a nature documentary and half the time it felt like a cartoon. There was room to improve the story from the original and that wasn't done. However, the true crime was the neutering of "Be Prepared." The coolest-sounding song from the original was turned into a brief spoken poem. On the bright side: Glover is a big improvement over Broderick and Eichner & Rogen had a top-notch turn as Timon & Pumbaa.
|
|||
| Sep 16 | Popcornemil | 34 0% |
|
| Sep 15 |  |
Lakriitz | 4 73% |
| Sep 14 | imcn100 | 60 51% |
|
| Sep 13 | xzf620 | 86 57% |
|
| Sep 13 | slanbexx | 5 0% |
|
| Sep 12 | Steffen53 | 89 79% |
|
| Sep 12 | Italo | 1 0% |
|
| Sep 10 | Jundurian | 75 38% |
|
| Sep 09 |  |
gudmovies | 80 38% |
| Sep 09 | MaQuaid89 | 60 22% |
|
| Sep 08 |  |
joaobaldoni | 70 29% |
| Sep 08 | k13Yfg | 22 0% |
|
| Sep 07 |  |
medium pizza | 0 0% |
| Sep 07 |  |
Lilirose | 73 39% |
|
La storia è bella e fa commuovere, anche se non è nulla di nuovo ovviamente. Peccato per il doppiaggio italiano infame, d'altronde Mengoni ed Elisa sono cantanti non doppiatori, ad ognuno il suo mestiere.
|
|||
| Sep 06 | T9iNNP | 60 37% |
|
| Sep 05 |  |
Vandelay1 | 41 37% |
|
watchable
|
|||
| Sep 05 | DM3mOp | 63 2% |
|
| Sep 04 |  |
Thomassejer | 40 12% |
| Sep 04 | Wieland | 60 31% |
|
| Sep 02 | daveyp | 70 19% |
|
| Sep 01 |  |
kgbelliveau | 80 54% |
|
It could never quite capture the magic of the original perhaps that is because everything was the same plot wise. Perhaps it is because the generation that saw the original is now all grown up. Perhaps it's the visuals that are hyper realistic that don't make it as easy to buy into. It's all those factors rolled in to one plus the idea that it does not feel necessary nor does it really add anything to the playing field that hasn't been done before.
|
|||
| Sep 01 | tjrink | 10 6% |
|
| Sep 01 | sir_hugh | 73 52% |
|
| Aug 31 |  |
woodybaba | 88 79% |
| Aug 31 | cutecake | 55 23% |
|
| Aug 31 | verdantflare | 60 54% |
|
| Aug 31 | BeyaZenci | 77 53% |
|
| Aug 31 |  |
Ofterdingen | 40 20% |
|
Straight-out boring.
|
|||
| Aug 31 | jackvacton | 90 92% |
|
| Aug 30 |  |
bacon&adidas | 70 0% |
| Aug 30 | Crupin | 50 16% |
|
| Aug 29 | shinySinger | 53 22% |
|
|
eh could have been worse
|
|||
| Aug 28 | blacksqd | 80 74% |
|
| Aug 28 | zLQWIM | 75 0% |
|
| Aug 27 | Hibearnation | 65 23% |
|
| Aug 27 |  |
LordBeefJerk | 40 24% |
| Aug 26 | bko | 75 62% |
|
| Aug 26 |  |
vp-3 | 60 21% |
| Aug 26 |  |
Xzlu | 4 30% |
| Aug 26 |  |
cantahta | 66 26% |
| Aug 25 | Rafael Reis | 75 27% |
|
| Aug 25 | Maaya1x2 | 3 45% |
|
| Aug 24 | bigboymood | 2 4% |
|
| Aug 23 |  |
NothingsGood | 55 49% |
|
What was the point of Rafiki?
|
|||
| Aug 22 |  |
Teproc | 37 13% |
| Aug 21 | Mtw44 | 86 90% |
|
| Aug 21 | ebartnt | 100 0% |
|
| Aug 21 | D8HFRf | 60 0% |
|
| Aug 20 | JayTeeBlaze | 80 48% |
|
| Aug 19 |  |
Ytadel | 4 42% |
|
This is remarkable on a technical achievement level - the fact that animators can sit in front of computers and make animals and locations that look like this in 2019 is truly astonishing. Creatively it’s a very soulless and through-the-motions remake of the 1994 original, without a single scene that betters or even matches the impact of its original 2D animated version. I can’t imagine that Jon Favreau is really the true top voice behind this movie rather than whoever the head animator was.
|
|||
| Aug 19 |  |
tinythedogg | 60 48% |
| Aug 19 | Contreras | 3 39% |
|
| Aug 19 |  |
Hurricane06 | 82 48% |
| Aug 19 | 3iabgk | 83 0% |
|
| Aug 18 | gsingal | 50 3% |
|
| Aug 18 |  |
mavrodief | 65 48% |
| Aug 17 |  |
soytoma | 70 64% |
| Aug 17 | Ixtiandur | 50 24% |
|
| Aug 16 | Toeler | 75 59% |
|
| Aug 16 | chiphall72 | 68 47% |
|
| Aug 16 |  |
melancholiaa | 70 48% |
| Aug 16 | bsrcnc | 50 24% |
|
| Aug 16 |  |
evrenuyanik | 40 23% |
| Aug 16 |  |
offlineoz | 45 28% |
| Aug 15 | insider4 | 82 42% |
|
| Aug 15 |  |
warrensm | 1 1% |
| Aug 14 |  |
Boateng | 70 17% |
| Aug 14 |  |
fth.d | 60 47% |
| Aug 14 | ofwgkta | 65 70% |
|
| Aug 14 | Diyavol | 75 36% |
|
| Aug 14 | akilnayak | 78 33% |
|
| Aug 13 | Cigua22 | 77 76% |
|
| Aug 12 |  |
TraverseTown | 15 7% |
| Aug 11 | apostlion | 89 71% |
|
| Aug 10 | zigooloo | 75 37% |
|
| Aug 09 | 10kfilms | 60 55% |
|
| Aug 09 |  |
qwershady | 60 20% |
| Aug 09 | Cinemafan89 | 60 23% |
|
| Aug 09 |  |
FrederikA | 50 35% |
|
As fantastic as the VFXs are (and they legitimately are breathtaking) this movie is an utterly pointless "Remastered" version of the one of classical animation's undisputed highlights. And as admirable as the filmmakers' dedication to lifelike representation of the animals behaviour is, the lack of any discernible emotion creates the movie's biggest problem - a lack of engagement with the characters and drama.
|
|||
| Aug 08 | ellicitsaint | 60 20% |
|
| Aug 08 | donnerfiesta | 30 6% |
|
| Aug 07 |  |
Miggs | 79 38% |
|
It doesn't have the same heart as the original. but I still enjoyed myself. This is definitely better than the Aladdin remake. It felt really nostalgic singing along to the iconic songs. If you're a Disney fan, I would definitely recommend this.
|
|||
| Aug 07 | Jaehaerys | 73 72% |
|
| Aug 07 |  |
VengefulKBM | 35 12% |
| Aug 07 |  |
Mystxis | 50 41% |
|
Disney'in elindeki orjinal animasyonları yeni nesile pazarlama dalgasının son ayağı Lion King 90 lardaki başarılı animasyonu yeni nesile live action türünde adapte etme amacının bir ürünü olarak ortaya çıkıyor Lion King bu yolda gerçekçilik sosu katmak için kullandığı CGI efektleriyle gerçekçi olmaya çalışırken işi abartıp yapay bir havaya büründürüyor adeta bir belgesel derlemesinden hallice bu yapım orjinalinin kurgusuna hiçbir şey katmayarak eseri daha k
|
|||
| Aug 07 | PerroNoche! | 55 17% |
|
| Aug 07 | Red_Dawn_WJ | 40 24% |
|
| Aug 06 |  |
ramynoodle | 30 14% |
| Aug 06 | chengming | 70 61% |
|
|
Yes, this does follow the original step by step - but there's enough good stuff in this film to see it twice in 20 years. What did not work were the voices, which suffer from being put in the mouth of hyperrealistic animals. Only Seth Rogen as Pumbaa got close to Bill-Murray-as-Baloo-territory. Zimmer's music also dithers between cliché and outright imitation, and yet all of that is easily forgotten when you see the incredible animation - for me this film is the start of a new era for CGI.
|
|||
| Aug 06 |  |
Sweeper770 | 72 18% |
| Aug 06 | rwhirata | 53 51% |
|
| Aug 05 |  |
feublo | 45 13% |
|
I’ll just go ahead and be the one who says it’s one of those remakes that didn’t need to be done, takes away from the magic I recall in the cartoon. And I love gambino, but his voice is too distracting as Simba. But still, the advancement of CGI makes it inevitable to remake anything production can get their hands on.
|
|||
| Aug 05 | umairqadeer | 95 84% |
|
| Aug 05 | Holy Munis | 60 6% |
|
| Aug 05 |  |
rnest | 6 45% |
| Aug 05 |  |
gbastos | 68 58% |
| Aug 05 | Reavic | 50 42% |
|
| Aug 04 | Zipnut5 | 65 11% |
|
| Aug 04 | TrefwoordP | 65 55% |
|
| Aug 04 |  |
Katya | 70 53% |
| Aug 04 |  |
Anja | 75 76% |
| Aug 04 |  |
hubies | 78 76% |
| Aug 04 | luckyxiii | 69 29% |
|
| Aug 04 | plvenice | 8 73% |
|
|
It's a delightful movie. I don't understand why it's getting such lukewarm reviews. Watch this one to remember what you loved in the original on the first place, and try to see it through the new lens. Try to avoid comparing them.
|
|||
| Aug 03 |  |
dead man | 82 39% |
| Aug 03 |  |
bafflegab | 81 79% |
| Aug 03 |  |
TheRealJ-Ro | 65 31% |
|
As Disney continues its weird and wild world tour of reselling 30-somethings' childhoods back to them at $12 a ticket, I'm left asking the question, "What's the point of this movie?" What does this movie give you that the 1994 offering doesn't? Beyonce as Nala. That's about it. Distracting voice acting and unflattering CGI (if you're going for, y'know, emotion) underscore the absolute lack of need for this remake. I didn't hate it. But it doesn't need to exist. Just watch the 1994 one, 'kay?
|
|||
| Aug 03 |  |
kerem10 | 70 36% |
| Aug 03 |  |
Zarkon | 75 38% |
|
Others have noted that the animals' facial expressiveness was lacking -- I noticed that as well, but I had the opposite reaction and thought they shouldn't have even bothered with animating their mouths.
|
|||
| Aug 02 |  |
Eglaia | 60 41% |
|
* I don't remember if Simba was this much a wuss in the original, but man, how easy is it to manipulate him? Even while he is to become king. Beyond stunning vfx, but not much else to offer in this one apart from the side characters maybe.
|
|||
| Aug 02 |  |
PunisherGT | 80 40% |
| Aug 02 | Nisept | 90 95% |
|
| Aug 02 |  |
targos21 | 60 37% |
| Aug 02 | morphinapg | 81 75% |
|
|
This is tricky to rate. I heard one person explain it very well "It's like you're enjoying the movie, but also bored at the same time". I give it points for the visual technology, for the score, for the cinematography, and some of the acting, but overall there's just a feeling that it's lacking the soul it needs, because they decided to make the animation just a little too realistic, where the animals simply are expressionless, and it hurts the movie.
|
|||
| Aug 02 |  |
8raz | 53 24% |
| Aug 01 |  |
closer_ | 65 51% |
| Aug 01 |  |
lena_c | 4 72% |
|
I know it's possible but I was so impressed with the visuals. I don't care what people say - I loved it. This being good doesn't make the original (1992) less good. Did I miss some of the iconic lines? Yes. Did it ruin the experience for me? No. *Good
|
|||
| Jul 31 | CoNQueRa | 88 66% |
|
| Jul 31 |  |
mannaz230 | 57 38% |
| Jul 31 | AnAccount | 55 37% |
|
| Jul 31 |  |
ladyC | 65 47% |
| Jul 31 | rdjb | 91 99% |
|
| Jul 31 |  |
meryemcik | 100 93% |
| Jul 31 |  |
mikelykzit | 70 48% |
| Jul 31 | yKW1Kj | 60 28% |
|
| Jul 30 |  |
JLFM | 35 11% |
|
The Circle of Life(less Disney remakes). So much effort has gone into these minuscule tweaks and adjustments designed to deviate from the original, but for what purpose? It’s still the same film, just longer and worse. Even the “groundbreaking” visuals will age quickly (the weightlessness of some of the crowd shots in particular already looks flimsy). This isn’t quite as aggressively dreadful as 2017’s appalling Beauty and the Beast, but The Lion King is somehow even more pointless.
|
|||
| Jul 30 | sellis | 55 23% |
|
| Jul 30 |  |
Langelund (CinemaZone.dk) | 40 24% |
|
Queen Bee - don’t mess with the King
|
|||
| Jul 30 | jzrhoades | 35 23% |
|
| Jul 30 |  |
gwynplaine | 85 70% |
| Jul 30 |  |
warmur7 | 78 52% |
| Jul 30 | Excal | 80 84% |
|
| Jul 29 |  |
ammutseba | 38 13% |
| Jul 29 |  |
mattd124 | 60 38% |
| Jul 28 | Greener | 63 40% |
|
| Jul 28 | Azeitolas | 83 90% |
|
| Jul 28 | Edsep | 60 12% |
|
| Jul 28 |  |
maddog | 65 25% |
|
Wow this did not work. Most of what makes this movie 'good' either comes from walking in the shadow of the animated feature, or the occasional moment when Disney ditches the expected script to poke fun at itself. But most of the movie tries too hard to copy the original, and what changes it does make to 'plot' or personality are extraneous or go nowhere. Watch the original. Forget this. Voice acting was lacking. Emotional expression wasn't there. It's a pale copy.
|
|||
| Jul 28 |  |
rfdutra | 8 75% |
| Jul 28 | RichardvDam | 99 98% |
|
| Jul 28 | spidex | 70 27% |
|
| Jul 28 | Pix54 | 44 8% |
|
| Jul 28 |  |
p.carefree | 55 0% |
| Jul 28 |  |
d_drudges | 30 31% |
|
Pointless. The updated visuals only underline how superficial the movie's world is. Despite what Mufasa might lie through his teeth, we can all see that for him all species are not created equal, and a true happy ending would have involved the Czar's whole lineage getting wiped out, as happened historically.
|
|||
| Jul 28 |  |
SantaClaus | 66 57% |
| Jul 28 |  |
gogolit | 0 0% |
|
Disney animation willfully abandon and set fire to all the sacred rules they discovered about how to make good, enjoyable and engaging animation. Thought the current crop of Disney execs got their wallets stuffed so the moral of the story is: that's all that matters.
|
|||
| Jul 28 |  |
Murray | 70 26% |
| Jul 28 |  |
cambel | 55 27% |
| Jul 27 | ArcticLendri | 42 11% |
|
| Jul 27 | bayle | 7 18% |
|
| Jul 27 | Rems | 61 43% |
|
| Jul 27 | ilmatto | 50 19% |
|
| Jul 27 | Keekdahl | 75 47% |
|
| Jul 27 | tommy_leazaq | 55 43% |
|
| Jul 27 |  |
Okkervil | 30 21% |
|
The original is for me Disney’s greatest animated achievement, not faultless by any means but beautiful, dramatic and funny. This really is none of those things.
|
|||
| Jul 27 | Gossamer | 1 33% |
|
| Jul 26 | adamquelch | 77 56% |
|
| Jul 26 | eppulf | 62 12% |
|
| Jul 26 |  |
hsncomert | 40 28% |
| Jul 26 | joebocop | 60 38% |
|
| Jul 26 |  |
drsword | 55 14% |
| Jul 26 | Paddy | 55 28% |
|
| Jul 26 |  |
simajudas | 75 63% |
| Jul 26 |  |
Groovy_Souls | 50 29% |
|
This version of The Lion King just did absolutely nothing for me. It wasn't a bad film, and so I don't feel like I can rate it poorly, but the truth is that it really did the bare minimum for me. The casting, while seemingly perfect, was unimpressive. Glover and Beyonce specifically were uncharacteristically dull. And while some shots looked beautiful, the animal CGI feels like it regressed even from Favreau's last attempt in Jungle Book. Just sorely disappointing.
|
|||
| Jul 25 | JJJensen | 79 41% |
|
| Jul 25 | FlorVdE | 3 68% |
|
| Jul 25 |  |
monclivie | 82 78% |
| Jul 25 | worleyjamers | 60 32% |
|
| Jul 25 |  |
siphus007 | 74 47% |
|
Lion King remastered. Which would be better if the original Lion King wasn't a perfect masterpiece.
|
|||
| Jul 25 |  |
kadikoy | 60 48% |
|
Walt Disney animasyonları film yapmaya devam. Aslan ailesine yeni doğan Simba Kuruyemiş, kral olmak için yaşayarak öğrenir. Eğlenceli bir film. Fakat filmin 2. yarıda fazla ritüel kaçtı. Aslan olmak zor. Öleceksin. Tanrı olacaksın. Tüm sorumluluk sende. Ölme aslanım ölme.
|
|||
| Jul 25 |  |
lucius | 38 9% |
| Jul 25 |  |
Stewball | 80 80% |
|
I liked the live action capture CGI animation (or whatever the hell they're gonna call it) better than the original. Artistically, it's stunning.
|
|||
| Jul 25 | savagebren | 50 24% |
|
| Jul 24 |  |
inmate | 59 13% |
| Jul 24 |  |
Sahid | 6 47% |
| Jul 24 |  |
LadyStardust | 70 34% |
| Jul 24 |  |
Beer94 | 64 53% |
|
I think I’m positively biased here due to sheer nostalgia and Eichner stealing every scene, but I did quite enjoy this overall. Technically it’s great with the level of CGI but it does feel quite hollow and just feels like a sort of ‘clinical’ remake for me. Decent but see the original and see the show in the theatre.
|
|||
| Jul 24 |  |
avgcrtckr | 46 36% |
| Jul 24 |  |
filmaffinity | 67 70% |
| Jul 24 |  |
Bartbaard | 35 9% |
|
Bad. Because of a lack of emotion in the characters, there is no attachment to the audience. It's a shame they only mumble about since the voice cast did well. Furthermore the realism route they took with this remake takes away from the atmosphere of certain places. While they did the jungle reasonably well, The elephants graveyard just isn't spooky and Scars' character doesn't look menacing. I think they should have embraced more of the character movement and lighting of the original.
|
|||
| Jul 24 |  |
rihrey | 26 39% |
|
Baby Pumbaa is literally one of the greatest things I've ever seen; the movie itself, though, not so much.
|
|||
| Jul 24 | SlumberyBox | 93 91% |
|
| Jul 24 |  |
Leonardis | 80 37% |
|
The original is one of my favorite Disney movies, so I have to nitpick a little. I didn't appreciate some of the songs being cut short. The lack of visual emotion from the lions is pretty noticeable too, especially when the voice acting is so good. That's not to say it's bad though. The music is still great and the CGI is absolutely astonishing. I didn't even feel the length. It looks and feels like The Lion King, it just lacks the overall spirit of the original. I still liked it though.
|
|||
| Jul 24 | zflbdaf | 85 70% |
|
| Jul 24 | Crusty | 3 2% |
|
| Jul 24 |  |
mnzeric | 3 37% |
| Jul 24 |  |
Corbad | 50 14% |
|
The photoreal environments were stunning, but no amount of detail or colour could save each one from becoming Uncanny Valley, Africa as soon as an animal opened its mouth to speak—though, admittedly, Timon and Pumba were a riot. To boot, the story is terribly weak, the photorealism acting as a catalyst to realize a bevy of unfortunate elements (the lack of agency for the lionesses, the terribly shallow romance, the harem, the super twisted politics of the savanna).
|
|||
| Jul 23 |  |
The Beast | 5 38% |
| Jul 23 |  |
lucas1092 | 85 58% |
| Jul 23 |  |
emreco | 70 56% |
| Jul 23 |  |
Bunken | 60 52% |
| Jul 23 | getmoney | 77 43% |
|
|
Pretty good cover of a movie
|
|||
| Jul 23 |  |
Simionski | 50 30% |
| Jul 22 | Onac | 65 58% |
|
|
It's worth your time if you love the original, but if you haven't seen the 1994 version, go and watch that one. The archetypical story and characters are working here as well, Mufasa might even be better than in the animated movie. However the animals show almost no facial expression at all which added very much to the drama in the original. Also the songs are just terrible - aside from the opening - they put so little effort into them, it would have been better if they left them out altogether.
|
|||
| Jul 22 | jhmee8 | 74 36% |
|
Displaying 1 to 250 of 326 total ratings: Prev | Next
| Average Percentile 39.34% from 326 Ratings |  |
