The Lion King (2019)
After the murder of his father, a young lion prince flees his kingdom only to learn the true meaning of responsibility and bravery.
Genres: Drama, Family/Kids, Adventure, Animation
Country: USA
Directed By: Jon Favreau
Written By: Jeff Nathanson, Brenda Chapman
Starring: James Earl Jones, Beyoncé, Alfre Woodard, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Seth Rogen, John Kani, John Oliver, Donald Glover, Keegan-Michael Key, Billy Eichner
Loading Products from EbayLoading...
The Lion King belongs to 16 collections
1. Women+ (public: moderated by paulofilmo - 17 stars)
2. Films available in HD (public: moderated by kubricksucks - 12 stars)
3. Remake (public: moderated by td888 - 8 stars)
4. #1 at the US Box Office (public: moderated by BeeDub - 5 stars)
5. Brothers (public: moderated by djross - 4 stars)
6. Worldwide box office over $1,000,000,000 (public: moderated by djross - 2 stars)
7. Worldwide box office over $500,000,000 (public: moderated by djross - 2 stars)
8. Live-Action Disney Adaptations (public: moderated by Boxcars - 2 stars)
9. father-son relationship (public: moderated by livelove - 2 stars)
10. Cinema Sins (public: moderated by Phantom Nook - 2 stars)
11. Worldwide box office top 100 (public: moderated by djross - 1 star)
12. Worldwide box office over $750,000,000 (public: moderated by djross)
13. Ten highest-grossing films by worldwide box office (public: moderated by djross)
14. Worldwide box office over $1,500,000,000 (public: moderated by djross)
15. Nostalgia Critic - Disneycember (public: moderated by Phantom Nook)
16. Disney Live-Action (private: jacqueskit)
Browse the full list of collections
| Date | User | Rating | |
| Dec 13 |  |
Spunkie | 40 24% |
| Dec 13 | ihatemovies1 | 80 60% |
|
| Dec 12 | jjack229 | 53 21% |
|
| Dec 12 | SparkKnight | 16 10% |
|
| Dec 12 | k457 | 70 0% |
|
| Dec 11 | jjwoodson | 50 27% |
|
| Dec 10 |  |
cenowalrider | 65 74% |
| Dec 09 |  |
JeremyJahns | 3 33% |
| Dec 09 | Skerringer | 47 24% |
|
| Dec 08 | cable101 | 40 32% |
|
| Dec 06 |  |
Topaz | 55 36% |
| Dec 04 | REH | 40 30% |
|
| Dec 04 |  |
Hurricane06 | 79 45% |
| Dec 04 | sagikk | 60 38% |
|
| Dec 04 | ibi8588 | 60 26% |
|
| Dec 03 |  |
careunicorn | 85 21% |
| Dec 03 | furyslefteye | 7 47% |
|
| Dec 01 | wordsdreams | 50 29% |
|
| Nov 30 | chanmandy | 2 0% |
|
| Nov 30 | volkantaner | 70 27% |
|
| Nov 29 | lrlebouvier | 73 31% |
|
| Nov 28 | siweq86 | 80 81% |
|
| Nov 27 |  |
Sachaz | 44 26% |
| Nov 25 |  |
sima ghasemi | 63 40% |
| Nov 25 | Michygen | 70 41% |
|
| Nov 25 |  |
DavidBlast | 40 29% |
|
Some years ago, fellow criticker and all-around gentleman Dean Franz amazed us all with the now legendary description of certain movies as being like a 'limp dick in the face'. Well, this one is photo realistic.
|
|||
| Nov 25 |  |
mattorama12 | 64 47% |
|
Everything was pretty good. It follows the original practically frame for frame many times, so there's little that feels new other than maybe Timon and Pumba
|
|||
| Nov 25 | 12insoft | 80 27% |
|
| Nov 24 | law | 6 10% |
|
|
The Lion King lives in a place you wouldn't want to visit, the off-putting, stomach-churning Uncanny Valley. The (attempted) photorealism doesn't mix well with the fantastical storytelling.
|
|||
| Nov 23 | rakfisk | 20 1% |
|
| Nov 22 | UserIdNedd | 70 0% |
|
| Nov 22 |  |
mert2707 | 55 18% |
| Nov 22 | KingArturo | 95 93% |
|
| Nov 21 | miedzcu | 71 54% |
|
| Nov 20 | ethanethan | 0 6% |
|
| Nov 19 |  |
NhanLa | 60 37% |
| Nov 18 | arnoldchoi | 65 3% |
|
| Nov 17 | aunsalg82 | 70 45% |
|
| Nov 17 | Tigertemprr | 55 21% |
|
| Nov 16 | godmonster | 40 17% |
|
| Nov 14 |  |
emvey | 58 5% |
| Nov 13 | thisispants | 40 3% |
|
| Nov 11 |  |
defiance13 | 75 81% |
| Nov 11 |  |
AgentSnipe | 78 54% |
| Nov 11 |  |
dst7175 | 65 52% |
|
The movie was ok. This movie may have looked more real but it didn’t feel as great as the original
|
|||
| Nov 09 |  |
el Cinefilo | 20 36% |
| Nov 09 |  |
afcitrin | 62 29% |
| Nov 09 |  |
beard_metals | 60 56% |
| Nov 09 |  |
Vicenzo | 3 11% |
| Nov 07 |  |
waqar | 38 17% |
| Nov 07 | pimnl | 68 45% |
|
|
Beautifully photo realistic, had a few giggles, but a a children's story story line with not much depth.
|
|||
| Nov 06 |  |
Bawdabaw | 0 11% |
| Nov 05 | lefterisd99 | 10 0% |
|
| Nov 05 |  |
vonSmith | 65 21% |
| Nov 05 | Licpa | 50 12% |
|
| Nov 04 | cinebad | 42 4% |
|
| Nov 04 |  |
Phelipe | 68 45% |
| Nov 04 |  |
aparajit.s | 75 34% |
| Nov 04 |  |
moist666 | 96 48% |
| Nov 03 | CreationP | 100 88% |
|
| Nov 03 |  |
gozdeyuksel | 70 61% |
| Nov 03 |  |
Vokalbum | 60 37% |
| Nov 02 |  |
dieguin | 39 6% |
| Nov 01 | deezed | 20 7% |
|
| Nov 01 | 3YhjBl | 2 1% |
|
| Oct 31 |  |
Dthepyek | 47 47% |
| Oct 31 |  |
kough33 | 75 68% |
| Oct 31 |  |
arashnia | 72 34% |
| Oct 31 | Yang Gang | 10 0% |
|
| Oct 30 | judsonlady | 50 15% |
|
|
I had enjoyed the previous Disney live action remakes, but I was right to be sceptical of this one. I applaud that Disney chose a diverse cast. However, having James Earl Jones back as Mufasa just makes all the other voices sound wrong. Also, it felt many of the best/funniest parts were changed for no good reason or give some of the big names in the film more screen time without substance.
|
|||
| Oct 30 |  |
mfjlefou | 65 40% |
| Oct 29 |  |
deanjames | 50 22% |
| Oct 28 | Mavoy | 50 4% |
|
| Oct 28 |  |
arrow-s | 55 17% |
| Oct 28 |  |
MojoJoestar | 50 9% |
|
While I'm impressed by how far CGI has come, this is truly just a soulless attempt at cash grab. It's nearly scene-by-scene identical to the original animated film and serves no real purpose. It may entertain small children, but fans of the original should just stay away.
|
|||
| Oct 27 |  |
Vana | 6 67% |
| Oct 27 |  |
Mire | 65 43% |
| Oct 27 |  |
saguara | 63 15% |
| Oct 27 | nobamba | 50 37% |
|
|
Another solid remake from Disney but the "live action" just doesn't fit the storytelling as well as the animated version. Breathtaking CGI. When they're that real, though, it's hard to see beyond the nature show aspect and see them as characters rather than animals. Scar & stampede not as scary. Seth Rogen's Pumbaa MVP. I had a hard time telling the female lions or the cubs apart. Not sure the extra runtime was worth it. Fav scene: contrived sequence with the fur getting back to Rafiki.
|
|||
| Oct 27 |  |
Roshambo | 50 27% |
| Oct 26 |  |
orangezen | 75 77% |
| Oct 25 | cloondog | 1 0% |
|
| Oct 25 | Sts95 | 80 74% |
|
| Oct 25 | Cronos | 40 30% |
|
| Oct 24 |  |
donmezsefa | 60 39% |
| Oct 24 |  |
monclaro | 60 48% |
| Oct 24 | pplin | 63 37% |
|
| Oct 23 |  |
coffee | 45 16% |
| Oct 23 | flipperrbm | 4 24% |
|
| Oct 23 | enigmazweb24 | 90 45% |
|
| Oct 23 |  |
PrinceKaro | 24 15% |
| Oct 22 |  |
halkas | 50 41% |
| Oct 22 |  |
kk3thess | 10 1% |
| Oct 20 | mcginley561 | 69 38% |
|
| Oct 20 |  |
Jaifman | 47 9% |
| Oct 20 | punk_dfc | 66 47% |
|
| Oct 20 |  |
feritdgn | 60 21% |
| Oct 20 |  |
daniel | 50 68% |
| Oct 20 | 3sVtPs | 50 25% |
|
| Oct 20 | Bricks | 62 53% |
|
| Oct 20 |  |
Matthew Parkinson (CineMarter) | 60 62% |
| Oct 19 | Prokroustis | 30 1% |
|
| Oct 19 |  |
semitozge | 58 25% |
| Oct 19 | Godzilla98 | 25 2% |
|
| Oct 19 |  |
Mirelurk | 50 18% |
|
Should be viewed as a ridiculous, redundant folly but instead made 1.7 bn dollars. Depressing.
|
|||
| Oct 19 | furnos | 70 62% |
|
| Oct 19 |  |
Iamdwg | 93 92% |
|
While the critics are right when saying there's a massive lack in the personified expressions seen in the classic film, that affected my overal score negatively by 2%, since it slightly affected the acting and chemistry sub-scores. It doesn't affect characters, casting, or individual importance. Looking past that, BEAUTIFUL visuals, impressive casting, great music, great story, and I felt it. If we weren't spoiled by the 90s film...people may have loved this movie.
|
|||
| Oct 19 | itay | 70 55% |
|
| Oct 19 |  |
normatic | 60 37% |
| Oct 19 |  |
mnzsgabriel | 5 32% |
| Oct 18 |  |
ibrahimbars | 65 42% |
| Oct 18 |  |
acrolyne | 40 9% |
| Oct 18 |  |
outTake | 72 43% |
| Oct 18 | braddad68 | 88 40% |
|
|
It's the same movie, just not as good. I think the realism of the animals will make it tougher for kids. Also, the music wasn't perfect like the original. Just because you can remake the Disney films to more live action, doesn't mean you need to. I'll stick with the 1994 animated version.
|
|||
| Oct 18 |  |
cankutozturk | 72 26% |
| Oct 16 |  |
Winternight | 70 86% |
| Oct 16 |  |
walkabout | 60 39% |
| Oct 16 |  |
jordanrosman | 76 70% |
| Oct 16 | bizort | 54 30% |
|
|
Gorgeous movie to look at but that's mostly it. Not bad by any means but rarely interesting
|
|||
| Oct 15 |  |
stoned | 60 8% |
| Oct 15 |  |
babyyoda | 65 10% |
| Oct 15 |  |
Vassago | 80 80% |
| Oct 15 | andrewnguyen | 50 10% |
|
| Oct 14 | LesterGroans | 48 10% |
|
| Oct 14 |  |
yigityilmaz | 45 35% |
| Oct 14 | JayDee87 | 52 12% |
|
| Oct 13 | Yeboah | 65 51% |
|
| Oct 13 | kljnsclkn | 70 25% |
|
| Oct 13 | vTf5uk | 70 0% |
|
| Oct 13 | zevel6 | 51 33% |
|
| Oct 13 | Blondone86 | 71 55% |
|
| Oct 13 |  |
jacqueskit | 20 13% |
| Oct 13 | adamorumcek | 80 65% |
|
| Oct 13 | StegSchreck | 60 38% |
|
| Oct 13 |  |
umurtas | 40 27% |
| Oct 13 |  |
oguzhnakkaya | 60 41% |
| Oct 13 |  |
bybrt | 50 25% |
| Oct 13 |  |
pietias231 | 75 54% |
| Oct 13 |  |
Luk92 | 45 13% |
| Oct 13 | jzeitz | 82 66% |
|
| Oct 13 |  |
Blair | 80 40% |
| Oct 13 |  |
Ramy | 40 33% |
| Oct 13 |  |
rlukaku | 70 51% |
| Oct 13 |  |
Korsoh | 60 14% |
| Oct 12 | rootbeercirc | 62 17% |
|
| Oct 12 |  |
amazedemon | 60 21% |
|
I did not enjoy this remake of The Lion King, and that's okay. Technically the animation looks great, but it strips away the emotion present in the anthropomorphised 2D version. The lighting makes the film less vibrant, making it hard to distinguish between Simba & Scar. The voice acting ranges from decent to obnoxious (Beyoncé), and the songs are somehow less memorable. Comparison to the original is inevitable as it's a shot-for-shot remake, with half an hour added to tell you nihilism is bad.
|
|||
| Oct 12 | Jorg | 60 27% |
|
| Oct 12 | danialinho | 58 39% |
|
| Oct 12 | mvsilva | 40 2% |
|
| Oct 12 | spyce | 12 0% |
|
| Oct 12 | PUNQ | 50 78% |
|
|
I love animals, so up my alley. The songs, and I've heard them places before, does little for me. Not my taste. I get the feeling the realistic look takes the experience down a notch. Looses that old Disney charm, which has made their cartoons timeless classics. The life-circle story is evergreen and enchanting. Still, I'm struggling with the realistic conversion holding back the emotional effect of it. Good family film, but the Disney magic has been whitewashed off the experience.
|
|||
| Oct 12 |  |
korbenPL | 44 51% |
| Oct 12 |  |
bridggedale | 70 43% |
| Oct 12 |  |
selingoknar | 73 40% |
| Oct 12 |  |
ikkegoemikke | 69 71% |
| Oct 12 |  |
buddhalou | 50 17% |
| Oct 12 |  |
Guernica | 35 26% |
| Oct 11 | fireroot | 60 46% |
|
| Oct 11 |  |
navid.g | 60 14% |
| Oct 11 | aqamal | 62 28% |
|
| Oct 10 |  |
fatiherdem | 70 57% |
| Oct 01 |  |
mega RUB | 76 27% |
| Sep 30 | Sense1ess | 75 77% |
|
| Sep 30 | bilbo | 0 19% |
|
| Sep 29 | Theo X | 70 19% |
|
| Sep 29 | DNrEub | 70 0% |
|
| Sep 26 |  |
Bondy | 0 4% |
|
I went in blind having never seen the original so I had no nostalgic wink to my eye or anything. So my opinion is unbiased. It's hot garage.
|
|||
| Sep 26 | razzy8 | 13 16% |
|
| Sep 22 |  |
Delfos | 50 13% |
| Sep 22 | bentien | 65 61% |
|
|
One tough film to rate. Evokes some of the same feelings as the original (mainly because of the nostalgia), but seeing a film that mimics its original in such a way is at the same time superfluous. I liked som of the plot explanations that updated the story to 2019.
|
|||
| Sep 21 | Jonrock411 | 3 8% |
|
| Sep 20 |  |
eleanor | 55 53% |
| Sep 20 |  |
obiden | 60 14% |
| Sep 19 | metalrocker | 55 17% |
|
| Sep 17 | WulfstanLee | 60 52% |
|
| Sep 16 | tubasaxt | 75 32% |
|
|
I liked it, but didn't love it. The look of the film was inconsistent: half the time it felt like a nature documentary and half the time it felt like a cartoon. There was room to improve the story from the original and that wasn't done. However, the true crime was the neutering of "Be Prepared." The coolest-sounding song from the original was turned into a brief spoken poem. On the bright side: Glover is a big improvement over Broderick and Eichner & Rogen had a top-notch turn as Timon & Pumbaa.
|
|||
| Sep 16 | Popcornemil | 34 0% |
|
| Sep 15 |  |
Lakriitz | 4 73% |
| Sep 14 | imcn100 | 60 51% |
|
| Sep 13 | xzf620 | 86 57% |
|
| Sep 13 | slanbexx | 5 0% |
|
| Sep 12 | Steffen53 | 89 78% |
|
| Sep 12 | Italo | 1 0% |
|
| Sep 10 | Jundurian | 75 39% |
|
| Sep 09 |  |
gudmovies | 80 38% |
| Sep 09 | MaQuaid89 | 60 22% |
|
| Sep 08 |  |
joaobaldoni | 70 29% |
| Sep 08 | k13Yfg | 22 0% |
|
| Sep 07 |  |
iconogassed | 0 0% |
| Sep 07 |  |
Lilirose | 73 40% |
|
La storia è bella e fa commuovere, anche se non è nulla di nuovo ovviamente. Peccato per il doppiaggio italiano infame, d'altronde Mengoni ed Elisa sono cantanti non doppiatori, ad ognuno il suo mestiere.
|
|||
| Sep 07 | T9iNNP | 60 37% |
|
| Sep 05 |  |
Vandelay1 | 41 38% |
|
watchable
|
|||
| Sep 05 | DM3mOp | 63 2% |
|
| Sep 04 |  |
Thomassejer | 40 12% |
| Sep 04 | Wieland | 60 31% |
|
| Sep 02 | daveyp | 70 19% |
|
| Sep 02 |  |
kgbelliveau | 80 53% |
|
It could never quite capture the magic of the original perhaps that is because everything was the same plot wise. Perhaps it is because the generation that saw the original is now all grown up. Perhaps it's the visuals that are hyper realistic that don't make it as easy to buy into. It's all those factors rolled in to one plus the idea that it does not feel necessary nor does it really add anything to the playing field that hasn't been done before.
|
|||
| Sep 01 | tjrink | 10 6% |
|
| Sep 01 | sir_hugh | 73 51% |
|
| Aug 31 |  |
woodybaba | 88 79% |
| Aug 31 | cutecake | 55 23% |
|
| Aug 31 | BeyaZenci | 77 53% |
|
| Aug 31 |  |
Ofterdingen | 40 20% |
|
Straight-out boring.
|
|||
| Aug 31 | jackvacton | 90 92% |
|
| Aug 30 |  |
bacon&adidas | 70 31% |
| Aug 30 | Crupin | 50 16% |
|
| Aug 29 |  |
shinySinger | 53 22% |
|
eh could have been worse
|
|||
| Aug 28 | blacksqd | 80 74% |
|
| Aug 28 | zLQWIM | 75 0% |
|
| Aug 28 | Hibearnation | 65 23% |
|
| Aug 27 |  |
LordBeefJerk | 40 24% |
| Aug 27 | bko | 75 62% |
|
| Aug 26 |  |
vp-3 | 60 21% |
| Aug 26 |  |
Xzlu | 4 30% |
| Aug 26 |  |
cantahta | 66 25% |
| Aug 25 | Rafael Reis | 75 27% |
|
| Aug 25 | Maaya1x2 | 3 45% |
|
| Aug 24 | bigboymood | 2 4% |
|
| Aug 23 |  |
NothingsGood | 55 49% |
|
What was the point of Rafiki?
|
|||
| Aug 22 |  |
Teproc | 37 13% |
| Aug 21 | Mtw44 | 86 88% |
|
| Aug 21 | ebartnt | 100 0% |
|
| Aug 21 | D8HFRf | 60 0% |
|
| Aug 21 | JayTeeBlaze | 80 48% |
|
| Aug 20 |  |
Ytadel | 4 42% |
|
This is remarkable on a technical achievement level - the fact that animators can sit in front of computers and make animals and locations that look like this in 2019 is truly astonishing. Creatively it’s a very soulless and through-the-motions remake of the 1994 original, without a single scene that betters or even matches the impact of its original 2D animated version. I can’t imagine that Jon Favreau is really the true top voice behind this movie rather than whoever the head animator was.
|
|||
| Aug 19 |  |
tinythedogg | 60 48% |
| Aug 19 | Contreras | 3 39% |
|
| Aug 19 | 3iabgk | 83 0% |
|
| Aug 19 | gsingal | 50 3% |
|
| Aug 18 |  |
mavrodief | 65 48% |
| Aug 17 |  |
soytoma | 70 64% |
| Aug 17 | Ixtiandur | 50 24% |
|
| Aug 17 | Toeler | 75 59% |
|
| Aug 16 | chiphall72 | 68 47% |
|
| Aug 16 |  |
melancholiaa | 70 48% |
| Aug 16 | bsrcnc | 50 24% |
|
| Aug 16 |  |
evrenuyanik | 40 23% |
| Aug 16 |  |
offlineoz | 45 28% |
| Aug 15 | insider4 | 82 42% |
|
| Aug 15 |  |
warrensm | 1 1% |
| Aug 14 |  |
Boateng | 70 16% |
| Aug 14 |  |
fth.d | 60 47% |
| Aug 14 | ofwgkta | 65 69% |
|
| Aug 14 | Diyavol | 75 36% |
|
| Aug 14 | akilnayak | 78 33% |
|
| Aug 13 | Cigua22 | 77 76% |
|
| Aug 13 |  |
TraverseTown | 15 7% |
| Aug 11 | apostlion | 89 71% |
|
| Aug 10 | zigooloo | 75 37% |
|
| Aug 09 | 10kfilms | 60 55% |
|
Displaying 1 to 250 of 443 total ratings: Prev | Next
| Average Percentile 37.82% from 443 Ratings |  |
