<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'>
 <channel>
  <title>Criticker: Recent Ratings</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/</link>
  <description>A list of all the films ironcity18 has rated at Criticker, ordered by rating date</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
  <language>en</language>
 <item>
  <title>Jennifer 8 (1992) - 86 - 23 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Jennifer-8/</link>
  <guid>Jennifer-8-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave Jennifer 8 a rating of 86</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Jennifer-8.webp?v=1744726927' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Jennifer 8'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>23 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Jennifer-8/'>Jennifer 8 (1992)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 86<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Beautifully directed, dark thriller with twists and turns as an obsessed detective tracks a dead-end serial killer case with clues that point to him as he gets closer to the killer.  Andy Garcia smolders with gravitas and intensity in a way he has had trouble matching ever since.  classic scene in a rainy dump in the beginning, where he uncovers a severed hand.  John Malcovich nearly steals the film in a series of interrogations as a smarmy investigator trying to pin the murders on Garcia, and Lance Henrikson puts in some very solid character work.  Uma Thurman looks great and the film has a surprise ending that satsifies.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Parallax View (1974) - 97 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Parallax-View/</link>
  <guid>The-Parallax-View-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave The Parallax View a rating of 97</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Parallax-View.webp?v=1720102781' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Parallax View'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Parallax-View/'>The Parallax View (1974)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 97<br><b>Percentile:</b> 92.3077<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Great, under-appreciated 70&#039;s political thriller that holds up today in a way most of the quiet conspiracy films do not.  Needs to be reintroduced to a new generation, and could easily be remade today.  Beatty is kickass in a lcaonic way, with some cool fights and chases has he tracks a shadowy organization.  Great ending that will piss you off.  I like it most for its blaring lack of a constant underscore/soundtrack like most action thriller today, which over-engineer the sound.  this has a ta</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>North by Northwest (1959) - 97 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/North-by-Northwest/</link>
  <guid>North-by-Northwest-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave North by Northwest a rating of 97</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/North-by-Northwest.webp?v=1773640931' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='North by Northwest'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/North-by-Northwest/'>North by Northwest (1959)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 97<br><b>Percentile:</b> 92.3077<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Inconic film with amazing twists, great perfs, beautiful acting, and the best suit ever donned on film.  cary grant is dashing and perfect and the set pieces never fail to satisfy on repeat viewings.  The score by Hermann is also fantastic.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Friday Night Lights (2004) - 82 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Friday-Night-Lights/</link>
  <guid>Friday-Night-Lights-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave Friday Night Lights a rating of 82</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Friday-Night-Lights.webp?v=1733581405' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Friday Night Lights'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Friday-Night-Lights/'>Friday Night Lights (2004)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 82<br><b>Percentile:</b> 26.9231<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Over-hyped drama that captures the smalltown hysteria of texas high school football.  Pace, tone, colors, directing all are fisrt-rate.  But the TV show version blows the movie out of the water, so watch that instead before it gets cancelled.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Waterworld (1995) - 71 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Waterworld/</link>
  <guid>Waterworld-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave Waterworld a rating of 71</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Waterworld.webp?v=1720102905' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Waterworld'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Waterworld/'>Waterworld (1995)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 71<br><b>Percentile:</b> 3.8462<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Disappointing.  The beginning of the end for Costner, whose ego spiralled out of control.  He obviously liked it so much he did the Postman, which must&#039;ve borrowed the same sets (and was even worse).</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Mission: Impossible III (2006) - 84 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Mission-Impossible-III/</link>
  <guid>Mission-Impossible-III-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave Mission: Impossible III a rating of 84</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Mission-Impossible-III.webp?v=1720621220' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Mission: Impossible III'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Mission-Impossible-III/'>Mission: Impossible III (2006)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 84<br><b>Percentile:</b> 34.6154<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Surprisingly good the third time out, this is the first and only MI film i enjoyed, let alone followed plot-wise.  Basically it was like an episode of Alias starring Tom Cruise, which isn&#039;t a bad thing.  The bad guys are still a little arch, and the mask-trick is getting old, but this film is very fun overall.  no Bourne Supremacy, but worth watching nonetheless.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>American Pie (1999) - 90 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/American-Pie/</link>
  <guid>American-Pie-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave American Pie a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/American-Pie.webp?v=1718893264' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='American Pie'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/American-Pie/'>American Pie (1999)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 69.2308<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Fun, ribald teen sex comedy that hits all the marks and offers plenty of outrageous never-seen-before moments.  Simple story about getting laid before high school graduation becomes a coming of age tale with its share of touching and tender moments to go with its &quot;touching&quot; and crazy moments.  Succeeds because it has a heart.  Sean william Scott as Stiffler is classic, as is the term the movie coined :  MILF.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Shawshank Redemption (1994) - 95 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Shawshank-Redemption/</link>
  <guid>The-Shawshank-Redemption-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave The Shawshank Redemption a rating of 95</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Shawshank-Redemption.webp?v=1774594749' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Shawshank Redemption'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Shawshank-Redemption/'>The Shawshank Redemption (1994)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 95<br><b>Percentile:</b> 80.7692<br><b>Review:</b> <i>A great film.  Sweeping story, coherent story-telling, great perfs.  This was the film where Morgan Freeman&#039;s classy acting did not feel like it was a put-on.  Noble, true and with its share of surprises, this elegant mive is worthy of repeated viewings.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Alien (1979) - 90 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Alien/</link>
  <guid>Alien-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave Alien a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Alien.webp?v=1781786278' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Alien'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Alien/'>Alien (1979)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 69.2308<br><b>Review:</b> <i>The film that kick-started the baddest-ass heroine in the galaxy.  Weaver packs a pnch but Lance Henrikson is most special in his droid role.  Classic tension and more straightforward than the crowd-pleasing Aliens, which is more like Rocky 3 compared to the original Rocky.  Alien lacks some of the humor of Aliens but is more even tonally, and therefore a better film.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Miracle (2004) - 72 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Miracle/</link>
  <guid>Miracle-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave Miracle a rating of 72</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Miracle.webp?v=1726150813' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Miracle'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Miracle/'>Miracle (2004)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 72<br><b>Percentile:</b> 11.5385<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Surprisingly weak version of an uplifiting story we all know.  A bit slow and short on exciting gameplay, it takes so long to get us to the point we all know it is going that the upset is almost an afterthought.  Concentrated too much onthe coach, whose personal story was not as interesting as the team as a whole and the world geoplotical ramifications of the win. Nice casting of real players, solid directing.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Big Fish (2003) - 85 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Big-Fish/</link>
  <guid>Big-Fish-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave Big Fish a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Big-Fish.webp?v=1719238949' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Big Fish'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Big-Fish/'>Big Fish (2003)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 42.3077<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Wondrous, picturesque meandering film with a satisfying ending and a nice father-son relationship.  Colors are amazing and unlike many of Tim Burton;s films, the story and plot do not suffer at the expense of directing wizardry.  Only flaw is way the grown-up son is written -- he is overlyangry at his father and comes of callow instead of searching for greater meaning of his complicated father.  i resented the character and it took me out of the story at times.  Sappy but nice coda.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Transporter (2002) - 75 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Transporter/</link>
  <guid>The-Transporter-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave The Transporter a rating of 75</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Transporter.webp?v=1718461510' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Transporter'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Transporter/'>The Transporter (2002)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 75<br><b>Percentile:</b> 19.2308<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Short on logic but long on the action -- great set pieces and fight scenes.  Jason Statham is almost revelatory in his grim, workman-like preceision as he dispatches baddies with grace.  The story is choppy and sometimes feels like one of those clumsy, dubbed martial arts pictures, but you aren&#039;t here for taut plotting -- this is an action-fest and wild ride.  From that standpoint this film is a solid 85.  From a filmmaking standpoint, it is a 65.  I&#039;ll split the difference and call it a 75.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Wonder Boys (2000) - 87 - 19 Jan 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Wonder-Boys/</link>
  <guid>Wonder-Boys-ironcity18</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>ironcity18 gave Wonder Boys a rating of 87</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Wonder-Boys.webp?v=1722003745' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Wonder Boys'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>19 Jan 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Wonder-Boys/'>Wonder Boys (2000)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 87<br><b>Percentile:</b> 57.6923<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Witty, insightful story that is subtle and funny.  Nice pace, touching perfs, sweet but not sappy.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>