Greyhound

cinemat
Review by
24 Oct 2026
Bad
20th percentile
70
Greyhound tries to make the Battle of the Atlantic feel immediate and visceral, focusing on the brutal struggle between German U-boats and the Allied supply convoys crossing from the United States to Europe. In that respect, the film is effective: tense, technically solid, and often genuinely gripping.

At the same time, it falls back on a very familiar Hollywood wartime formula. Against the chaos, suffering, and madness of war stands Tom Hanks’ deeply religious, morally unwavering captain. A man who always seems to know what is right, acts according to his principles, and ultimately survives the ordeal with those values intact.

That gives the film an unmistakably propagandistic undertone: the Western side is presented through a reassuring moral framework in which faith, duty, decency, and courage are naturally aligned with the “right” side of history. The complexity and moral ambiguity of war rarely get much room.

Still, as a tightly constructed naval war film, Greyhound has real strengths. It is straightforward, atmospheric, well paced, and often very suspenseful. Ideologically simplistic, perhaps, but undeniably effective and engaging.
Mini Review: While undeniably effective as a tense, visceral naval thriller about the Battle of the Atlantic, the film relies on an ideologically simplistic Hollywood formula with a propagandistic undertone that centers on Tom Hanks' morally unwavering captain at the expense of war's true ambiguity.
Watch the Trailer