House of Dracula
Well... This is a confusing mess of a movie when you consider the canon of these films. I am really not sure what else to say about this besides that I honestly wouldn't consider this canon which is strange because this is the same guy who directed House of Frankenstein!
Anyways, "Dracula" in this sucks and I have no idea what his plan was, the inclusion of the other monsters in this muddy an otherwise salvageable plot that would have been cool to see. The audio in this is pretty bad as well. There's a hunchbacked lady for no reason which makes me wonder what that was about for the canon. What were they thinking, how does this tie anything together?
The doctor in this was pretty cool though, and I did like how SOME of this was shot. It could be a 3/10 but I feel this deserves a 2/10 from how messy it is!
Anyways, "Dracula" in this sucks and I have no idea what his plan was, the inclusion of the other monsters in this muddy an otherwise salvageable plot that would have been cool to see. The audio in this is pretty bad as well. There's a hunchbacked lady for no reason which makes me wonder what that was about for the canon. What were they thinking, how does this tie anything together?
The doctor in this was pretty cool though, and I did like how SOME of this was shot. It could be a 3/10 but I feel this deserves a 2/10 from how messy it is!
Mini Review: This film is a confusing mess that clashes with canon—odd, given it's from the director of House of Frankenstein. Dracula’s motives are unclear, the added monsters dilute a potentially salvageable plot, and the audio is poor. A random hunchbacked woman adds to the confusion. While the doctor character and some shots were decent, the overall execution is sloppy. I’d rate it 2/10 for its incoherence and missed potential.