Clinical
It seemed to me one of those silly films that leave you thinking that, honestly, there was no need to shoot this. It is not just weak, slow or unoriginal; it feels as if it had been made with leftovers from other psychological thrillers, glued together without grace and finished with twists that try to surprise when in reality they only confirm how poor everything was from the beginning.
The idea could have had something: a psychologist marked by the trauma of a patient, a difficult return to work, a disturbing new case and the possibility that the protagonist's mind is breaking. On paper, that could have made a small but tense film, with uncomfortable sessions, doubts, guilt and a disturbing relationship between therapist and patient. But the film does not know what to do with that base.
The biggest problem is that it never finds a tone. At times it wants to be psychological horror, at times mystery thriller, at times trauma drama and at times cheap-scare movie. But nothing has force. It does not scare, intrigue, move or build real discomfort. Everything seems placed so that the viewer waits for the next supposed twist, as if a twist by itself could lift a film.
Vinessa Shaw is perhaps the only thing that does not sink the whole thing even further. She does not do a bad job and tries to give Jane some humanity, but the script leaves her stranded too many times. Her decisions are not very believable, her reactions seem dictated by the need for the plot to move forward, and everything related to her professional practice as a psychologist feels quite forced. It is hard to take the film seriously when its psychological center is treated with so little finesse.
The sessions with the disfigured patient could have been the most interesting part. There was a real chance there to play with guilt, repulsion, compassion and the fear of looking another person's damage in the face. But even that remains half-hearted. The film hints at depth, but then trades it for a fairly vulgar suspense mechanism. Instead of exploring an unsettling relationship, it just keeps going in circles.
The pace is also a punishment. It takes too long to start, moves with a slowness that creates no tension and, when it finally tries to accelerate, it does so in a rushed way. It is not an elegant slow burn, the kind that gradually puts you into a state of anxiety; it is slow because it does not have enough interesting content to fill its running time. And that is extremely noticeable.
The scares do not make up for it either. There may be a slightly more unsettling moment, some image that could work, but they are isolated flashes in a film without real atmosphere. The ghosts, hallucinations, traumatic memories and apparitions are used in a way that is far too routine. It feels as if it were following a checklist of psychological-thriller elements without understanding how to turn them into something disturbing.
The script is the worst part. It is full of tricks, clumsy clues, wasted characters and revelations that do not create astonishment, but fatigue. The ending also seemed especially bad to me: forced, absurd and desperate to look clever. There are films that improve when the hidden mechanism is revealed; this one gets worse, because the more it explains, the more visible its seams become.
I was also bothered by how wasted the clinical premise is. A film about a traumatized therapist could have entered far more interesting territory: professional responsibility, guilt, mental fragility, the fear of failing a patient, the line between helping and projecting one's own ghosts. But here all that remains as decoration for a cheating and rather stupid puzzle.
Technically, there is not much to save either. The greyish photography, the muted tone, the discreet music and the flat staging do not help create an identity. Everything feels like a dark TV movie with pretensions, one of those that wants to seem more twisted than it is. It is not cheap in a fun way, nor bad with energy; it is simply poor, heavy and forgettable.
In the end, it remains for me a very bad, unnecessary film with no spark. I understand that someone might say it can be watched while doing something else, but for me that is not enough. A suspense film has to grab you, unsettle you, surprise you or at least amuse you with its nonsense. This one achieves almost none of that. It rambles, takes itself seriously, spins around itself and ends up proving that it had nothing truly interesting to say.
The idea could have had something: a psychologist marked by the trauma of a patient, a difficult return to work, a disturbing new case and the possibility that the protagonist's mind is breaking. On paper, that could have made a small but tense film, with uncomfortable sessions, doubts, guilt and a disturbing relationship between therapist and patient. But the film does not know what to do with that base.
The biggest problem is that it never finds a tone. At times it wants to be psychological horror, at times mystery thriller, at times trauma drama and at times cheap-scare movie. But nothing has force. It does not scare, intrigue, move or build real discomfort. Everything seems placed so that the viewer waits for the next supposed twist, as if a twist by itself could lift a film.
Vinessa Shaw is perhaps the only thing that does not sink the whole thing even further. She does not do a bad job and tries to give Jane some humanity, but the script leaves her stranded too many times. Her decisions are not very believable, her reactions seem dictated by the need for the plot to move forward, and everything related to her professional practice as a psychologist feels quite forced. It is hard to take the film seriously when its psychological center is treated with so little finesse.
The sessions with the disfigured patient could have been the most interesting part. There was a real chance there to play with guilt, repulsion, compassion and the fear of looking another person's damage in the face. But even that remains half-hearted. The film hints at depth, but then trades it for a fairly vulgar suspense mechanism. Instead of exploring an unsettling relationship, it just keeps going in circles.
The pace is also a punishment. It takes too long to start, moves with a slowness that creates no tension and, when it finally tries to accelerate, it does so in a rushed way. It is not an elegant slow burn, the kind that gradually puts you into a state of anxiety; it is slow because it does not have enough interesting content to fill its running time. And that is extremely noticeable.
The scares do not make up for it either. There may be a slightly more unsettling moment, some image that could work, but they are isolated flashes in a film without real atmosphere. The ghosts, hallucinations, traumatic memories and apparitions are used in a way that is far too routine. It feels as if it were following a checklist of psychological-thriller elements without understanding how to turn them into something disturbing.
The script is the worst part. It is full of tricks, clumsy clues, wasted characters and revelations that do not create astonishment, but fatigue. The ending also seemed especially bad to me: forced, absurd and desperate to look clever. There are films that improve when the hidden mechanism is revealed; this one gets worse, because the more it explains, the more visible its seams become.
I was also bothered by how wasted the clinical premise is. A film about a traumatized therapist could have entered far more interesting territory: professional responsibility, guilt, mental fragility, the fear of failing a patient, the line between helping and projecting one's own ghosts. But here all that remains as decoration for a cheating and rather stupid puzzle.
Technically, there is not much to save either. The greyish photography, the muted tone, the discreet music and the flat staging do not help create an identity. Everything feels like a dark TV movie with pretensions, one of those that wants to seem more twisted than it is. It is not cheap in a fun way, nor bad with energy; it is simply poor, heavy and forgettable.
In the end, it remains for me a very bad, unnecessary film with no spark. I understand that someone might say it can be watched while doing something else, but for me that is not enough. A suspense film has to grab you, unsettle you, surprise you or at least amuse you with its nonsense. This one achieves almost none of that. It rambles, takes itself seriously, spins around itself and ends up proving that it had nothing truly interesting to say.
Mini Review: It seemed to me one of those silly films that leave you thinking that, honestly, there was no need to shoot this. It is not just weak, slow or unoriginal; it feels as if it had been made with leftovers from other psychological thrillers, glued together without grace and finished with twists that try to surprise when in reality they only confirm how poor everything was from the beginning. The idea could have had something: a psychologist marked...
Watch the Trailer