Gerald's Game
It is not bad. I found it a rather curious story, one of those that starts from a very simple situation, almost impossible to stretch without collapsing: a woman handcuffed to a bed, in an isolated house, after a sexual game goes terribly wrong. With that, Mike Flanagan manages to build a psychological thriller more interesting than it first seemed, relying above all on mental tension, physical vulnerability and the protagonist's traumatic past.
What I liked most is that it does not try to turn everything into a standard scare movie. There is fear, of course, but the center is not so much whether something appears in the room as what happens inside Jessie. The film works when it turns that bed into a physical and mental prison: she cannot move, cannot ask for help, cannot escape and, on top of that, begins to face memories, guilt and wounds she had buried for years.
Carla Gugino is very good. In fact, the film depends almost entirely on her, and she handles the challenge with great confidence. She has to convey panic, exhaustion, rage, shame, lucidity and survival while barely being able to move from the same space. Her performance makes the situation feel not just like a script exercise, but like an increasingly distressing experience. Without her, the film would probably have been much less.
I also liked Bruce Greenwood, because his presence goes beyond the dead husband and the macabre starting point. Gerald becomes a kind of voice, a psychological ghost, a representation of a fairly unhealthy relationship. That impossible conversation between Jessie and the different parts of her fear helps the film become not just about a woman trying to free herself from handcuffs, but about someone trying to escape a much older prison.
The Stephen King side is very noticeable, for better and for worse. For better, because the premise has that very King-like mixture of extreme situation, childhood trauma, guilt, domestic violence and an almost supernatural threat. For worse, because at times the film underlines its symbols and explanations too much. There are powerful ideas, but sometimes it seems to need to verbalize them more than necessary, as if it did not fully trust the viewer to understand them.
The most unsettling element, for me, is that doubt between what is real and what is imagined. The nocturnal presence, the shadow, the strange figure in the room, works because the film plays with fatigue, dehydration, fear and the possibility that Jessie is seeing something that is not there. It did not always truly scare me, but it does maintain a constant discomfort. And in such a confined film, that already has merit.
The rhythm is quite good, although not perfect. There are very tense stretches and others where you can feel the effort to stretch the situation. I was not bored, but at some point I did feel the film had to fight against its own limitations. The concept is powerful, but also very closed, and not all the psychological turns have the same force. Even so, Flanagan knows how to dose the information and unease quite well.
The most physical and unpleasant scene works very well precisely because it comes after so much accumulated tension. It is not gratuitous gore, but a moment of extreme survival that almost hurts to watch. There the film proves it can be harsh without losing the emotional focus. What matters is not only the visual impact, but what it means for Jessie: making a brutal decision in order to stay alive.
What convinced me least comes toward the end. Without going into too much detail, I think the film explains more than it needed to and loses some force when it tries to close all the pieces in a way that is too clear. I was more interested in the ambiguity, the confinement, the inner struggle and the possibility that the terror was mixed with Jessie's mind. When everything is ordered too much, the mystery loses part of its poison.
In the end, it remains for me a fairly worthy, entertaining adaptation with more personality than many platform horror films. It does not seem like a masterpiece to me, but it is a well-handled story, with a very strong protagonist, a simple premise and a good mixture of suspense, trauma and survival. It is not bad at all: perhaps it explains too much, but it has tension, images that stay with you and a Carla Gugino who holds the film from beginning to end.
What I liked most is that it does not try to turn everything into a standard scare movie. There is fear, of course, but the center is not so much whether something appears in the room as what happens inside Jessie. The film works when it turns that bed into a physical and mental prison: she cannot move, cannot ask for help, cannot escape and, on top of that, begins to face memories, guilt and wounds she had buried for years.
Carla Gugino is very good. In fact, the film depends almost entirely on her, and she handles the challenge with great confidence. She has to convey panic, exhaustion, rage, shame, lucidity and survival while barely being able to move from the same space. Her performance makes the situation feel not just like a script exercise, but like an increasingly distressing experience. Without her, the film would probably have been much less.
I also liked Bruce Greenwood, because his presence goes beyond the dead husband and the macabre starting point. Gerald becomes a kind of voice, a psychological ghost, a representation of a fairly unhealthy relationship. That impossible conversation between Jessie and the different parts of her fear helps the film become not just about a woman trying to free herself from handcuffs, but about someone trying to escape a much older prison.
The Stephen King side is very noticeable, for better and for worse. For better, because the premise has that very King-like mixture of extreme situation, childhood trauma, guilt, domestic violence and an almost supernatural threat. For worse, because at times the film underlines its symbols and explanations too much. There are powerful ideas, but sometimes it seems to need to verbalize them more than necessary, as if it did not fully trust the viewer to understand them.
The most unsettling element, for me, is that doubt between what is real and what is imagined. The nocturnal presence, the shadow, the strange figure in the room, works because the film plays with fatigue, dehydration, fear and the possibility that Jessie is seeing something that is not there. It did not always truly scare me, but it does maintain a constant discomfort. And in such a confined film, that already has merit.
The rhythm is quite good, although not perfect. There are very tense stretches and others where you can feel the effort to stretch the situation. I was not bored, but at some point I did feel the film had to fight against its own limitations. The concept is powerful, but also very closed, and not all the psychological turns have the same force. Even so, Flanagan knows how to dose the information and unease quite well.
The most physical and unpleasant scene works very well precisely because it comes after so much accumulated tension. It is not gratuitous gore, but a moment of extreme survival that almost hurts to watch. There the film proves it can be harsh without losing the emotional focus. What matters is not only the visual impact, but what it means for Jessie: making a brutal decision in order to stay alive.
What convinced me least comes toward the end. Without going into too much detail, I think the film explains more than it needed to and loses some force when it tries to close all the pieces in a way that is too clear. I was more interested in the ambiguity, the confinement, the inner struggle and the possibility that the terror was mixed with Jessie's mind. When everything is ordered too much, the mystery loses part of its poison.
In the end, it remains for me a fairly worthy, entertaining adaptation with more personality than many platform horror films. It does not seem like a masterpiece to me, but it is a well-handled story, with a very strong protagonist, a simple premise and a good mixture of suspense, trauma and survival. It is not bad at all: perhaps it explains too much, but it has tension, images that stay with you and a Carla Gugino who holds the film from beginning to end.
Mini Review: It is not bad. I found it a rather curious story, one of those that starts from a very simple situation, almost impossible to stretch without collapsing: a woman handcuffed to a bed, in an isolated house, after a sexual game goes terribly wrong. With that, Mike Flanagan manages to build a psychological thriller more interesting than it first seemed, relying above all on mental tension, physical vulnerability and the protagonist's traumatic past....
More Reviews of Gerald's Game
Watch the Trailer