Women in Love

griggs79
Review by
30 Sep 2025
Awesome
82nd percentile
80
Women in Love may wear Edwardian costumes, but Ken Russell films it as a society in ruins. His characters behave as if the ruling elite, bloodied by war, had turned to pleasure to mask decline. The mood is then filtered through the free-for-all of the 1960s, where consumer freedom and countercultural style gave the illusion of change. Russell’s direction is fearless, shifting from painterly beauty to operatic hysteria, and the cast meet him: Glenda Jackson crackles as Gudrun, Oliver Reed radiates power in decline as Gerald, Alan Bates makes Birkin a restless intellectual, and Jennie Linden steadies Ursula with quiet resolve. Together, they become a portrait of a class order splitting apart.

Gerald, the industrial baron, is capital made flesh—money, patriarchy, machinery. He is not toppled by revolt but undone by his own contradictions. Birkin, the intellectual, dreams of a star-shaped harmony of love and friendship. But it is a fantasy of the bourgeois mind, promising escape while leaving the world untouched. The wrestling scene says it best: class and desire knotted together, the new middle class grappling with the old elite, neither side victorious.

Russell’s message to his generation is blunt: liberation intoxicates, but collapse does not guarantee renewal. Gerald’s end is no revolution—it is the blaze of a dying order that could burn everyone standing too close.
Mini Review: Ken Russell’s Women in Love plays like class in collapse: Edwardian frocks masking post-war disillusion and 60s abandon. Jackson crackles, Reed smoulders, Bates frets, Linden steadies. Gerald is capital made flesh, doomed to implode; Birkin dreams of harmony, but it’s bourgeois fantasy. The wrestling scene nails it—class and desire locked in sweaty stalemate. Liberation thrills, yet no new order rises from the fire.
Watch the Trailer