Watch
30 Days of Night: Dark Days

30 Days of Night: Dark Days

2010
Suspense/Thriller
Horror
Direct-to-Video
1h 32m
After surviving the incidents in Barrow, Alaska, Stella Olemaun relocates to Los Angeles, where she intentionally attracts the attention of the local vampire population in order to avenge the death of her husband, Eben.
Your probable score
?

30 Days of Night: Dark Days

2010
Suspense/Thriller
Horror
Direct-to-Video
1h 32m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 17.76% from 200 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(200)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 26 Oct 2012
14
1st
Best in 4x fast-forward. Hostage movie with vampires. * Casting, Acting : 2 * Script : 1 * Directing, Aura : 1 * Ease of Viewing : 1 * Naked Eye : 2
Rated 16 Jan 2013
17
0th
Complete and utter .... correction: almost complete and utter crap. Some of the actors can act, but they were given dialogue written by Somali mining slaves who wrote this scrip without a candle. I was relieved to have survived watching this ... piece of ... I do not even want to degrade the word "shit" by calling this movie that.
Rated 11 Jan 2011
55
9th
Was seriously hoping for a good sequel. Started out Ok, then had to endure the good guys going into situations with half-assed plans. I could have done a better job than them. Then the ending, don't even get me started on that! Sigh!!! I hate lazy directors and writers so much!!!!!
Rated 19 Jul 2011
40
36th
watchable
Rated 02 Oct 2010
35
19th
You can tell it's a DTV sequel, which is really a shame. For all its flaws, the first one was a nice horror movie with great atmosphere. This one has some good moments in it, but it's dragged down by a weak director, low budget and some big plotholes.
Rated 16 May 2011
30
17th
30 Days of Night: Dark Days is not worth your time. It isn't worth watching if you liked its predecessor, nor is it worth your time if you're looking for something incredibly different. It's bland, features terrible special effects, and simply isn't scary. The first film had the potential to be a frightening experience; this one ruins the canon and is a cheap cash-in with the main purpose of keeping interest in a series that should have only lasted one film.
Rated 05 Oct 2010
70
28th
first one is way better
Rated 08 Mar 2012
20
2nd
If you take away the 30 days of night you sort of take away the whole point.
Rated 03 Dec 2010
65
58th
Doesn't live up to the first one but isn't an insult to it either.
Rated 03 Oct 2010
60
16th
Hard to produce good results without the same actors from the original. Even still some ok gore and semi decent action carries it along. Two end scenes aren't very good though.
Rated 23 Sep 2022
9
39th
Rated 21 May 2014
14
6th
While the beginning is pretty interesting after the first half hour the movie falls apart, the third act is a test of patience. I passed the test...but I don't feel like I really won.
Rated 24 Oct 2011
40
3rd
That ending killed whatever satisfaction the gore gave.
Rated 30 Sep 2010
0
1st
Everything that made the first film good, this one hasn't got. One of the worst movie experiences in a long time. The plot is weak and the actors are lousy. So if you liked the first film, do not watch this one...
Rated 20 Jan 2011
50
10th
Messes up everything they got right in the first one. And it kinda sucks when the leading charachers are lazy dumbasses who go get them selves killed for no reasoin with out a fight plan.

Collections

(9)
Compact view

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...