<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'>
 <channel>
  <title>Criticker: Recent Ratings</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/</link>
  <description>A list of all the films Paul H has rated at Criticker, ordered by rating date</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 04:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
  <language>en</language>
 <item>
  <title>Gran Torino (2008) - 94 - 28 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Gran-Torino/</link>
  <guid>Gran-Torino-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Gran Torino a rating of 94</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Gran-Torino.webp?v=1773668221' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Gran Torino'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Gran-Torino/'>Gran Torino (2008)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 94<br><b>Percentile:</b> 87.7095<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I thought that in the beginning things were a bit repetitive, but when the main plot line came in the movie excelled. Clint Eastwood&#039;s character is really an excellent portrayal of a very mean war veteran who ends up going through an epiphany. The dialogue is hilarious at some parts and very serious at others. Overall, a very entertaining movie.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) - 87 - 28 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Raiders-of-the-Lost-Ark/</link>
  <guid>Raiders-of-the-Lost-Ark-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Raiders of the Lost Ark a rating of 87</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Raiders-of-the-Lost-Ark.webp?v=1717967870' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Raiders of the Lost Ark'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Raiders-of-the-Lost-Ark/'>Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 87<br><b>Percentile:</b> 46.648<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I honestly think it&#039;s overrated. Lacking a lot of action and moves too fast. Still, don&#039;t get me wrong it was a good movie but I think that the next two are far superior.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Electroma (2006) - 67 - 25 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Electroma/</link>
  <guid>Electroma-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Electroma a rating of 67</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Electroma.webp?v=1745418244' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Electroma'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>25 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Electroma/'>Electroma (2006)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 67<br><b>Percentile:</b> 10.8939<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I honestly can&#039;t completely describe this as an actual movie. Extremely dragged out sequences, a complete lack of sound and in actuality, the movie really only consisted of four different scenes. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love their music but this is just ridiculous. If they were to have hired a big name editor to cut down the movie, this could have been all of about 5 minutes.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Back to the Future Part III (1990) - 92 - 25 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future-Part-1990/</link>
  <guid>Back-to-the-Future-Part-1990-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Back to the Future Part III a rating of 92</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Back-to-the-Future-Part-1990.webp?v=1766741931' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Back to the Future Part III'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>25 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future-Part-1990/'>Back to the Future Part III (1990)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 92<br><b>Percentile:</b> 79.3296<br><b>Review:</b> <i>It doesnt really have the same feel as the other Back to the Future movies because of it&#039;s fairly basic storyline. But still, definitely delivers and provides as an excellent way to cap off the trilogy.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Back to the Future Part II (1989) - 97 - 25 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future-Part/</link>
  <guid>Back-to-the-Future-Part-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Back to the Future Part II a rating of 97</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Back-to-the-Future-Part.webp?v=1766741828' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Back to the Future Part II'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>25 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future-Part/'>Back to the Future Part II (1989)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 97<br><b>Percentile:</b> 93.5754<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Out of the three movies, this one definitely has the most in depth storyline and I think that this one really can stand up to the first movie and just about match it. Excellent.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (1966) - 100 - 25 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Good-the-Bad-and/</link>
  <guid>The-Good-the-Bad-and-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave The Good, the Bad and the Ugly a rating of 100</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Good-the-Bad-and.webp?v=1766737420' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Good, the Bad and the Ugly'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>25 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Good-the-Bad-and/'>The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (1966)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 100<br><b>Percentile:</b> 98.8827<br><b>Review:</b> <i>One of the best movies I&#039;ve seen in my life. The very complex story revolves around three characters: &quot;Blondie&quot;, &quot;Angel Eyes&quot;, and Tuco. These three characters work together so well with the strongest performance coming from Eli Wallach. He plays as the swindling, no good Tuco. Besides him, Clint Eastwood makes a very good character as well as Lee Van Cleef. Overall, just a really well-done movie in every aspect. Also, the soundtrack may be one of the very best I&#039;ve heard in any movie.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Caddyshack (1980) - 91 - 17 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Caddyshack/</link>
  <guid>Caddyshack-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Caddyshack a rating of 91</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Caddyshack.webp?v=1720880494' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Caddyshack'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>17 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Caddyshack/'>Caddyshack (1980)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 91<br><b>Percentile:</b> 74.581<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Rodney Dangerfield has to play one of the funniest characters in movie history. And along with Bill Murray and Chevy Chase, the three make up one of the funniest movies every made.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>2010: The Year We Make Contact (1984) - 88 - 17 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/2010-The-Year-We-Make/</link>
  <guid>2010-The-Year-We-Make-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave 2010: The Year We Make Contact a rating of 88</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/2010-The-Year-We-Make.webp?v=1722176616' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='2010: The Year We Make Contact'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>17 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/2010-The-Year-We-Make/'>2010: The Year We Make Contact (1984)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 88<br><b>Percentile:</b> 51.676<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Very bizzare movie. It is not very good as a sequel to 2001, but manages to be good as something completely different.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>This Is Spinal Tap (1984) - 94 - 17 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/This-Is-Spinal-Tap/</link>
  <guid>This-Is-Spinal-Tap-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave This Is Spinal Tap a rating of 94</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/This-Is-Spinal-Tap.webp?v=1719584562' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='This Is Spinal Tap'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>17 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/This-Is-Spinal-Tap/'>This Is Spinal Tap (1984)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 94<br><b>Percentile:</b> 87.7095<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Such a straight forward, fun and funny movie to watch.  By the way, it goes to eleven.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Schindler\'s List (1993) - 100 - 12 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Schindlers-List/</link>
  <guid>Schindlers-List-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Schindler\'s List a rating of 100</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Schindlers-List.webp?v=1771913526' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Schindler\'s List'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>12 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Schindlers-List/'>Schindler's List (1993)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 100<br><b>Percentile:</b> 98.8827<br><b>Review:</b> <i>No words can describe how amazing this movie is. Some of the most powerful as well as passionate performances in movie history. It is amazing how historically accurate this movie is also. Every little detail of this movie must have been verified. The soundtrack is haunting as well as brilliant. Phenomenal.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Back to the Future (1985) - 100 - 09 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future/</link>
  <guid>Back-to-the-Future-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Back to the Future a rating of 100</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Back-to-the-Future.webp?v=1766741737' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Back to the Future'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future/'>Back to the Future (1985)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 100<br><b>Percentile:</b> 98.8827<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Seriously, this may be one of the best films I have ever seen in my life. It is wildly entertaining and has so many little details that require repeated viewings. Just... so great.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Cloverfield (2008) - 94 - 09 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Cloverfield/</link>
  <guid>Cloverfield-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Cloverfield a rating of 94</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Cloverfield.webp?v=1775535597' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Cloverfield'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>09 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Cloverfield/'>Cloverfield (2008)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 94<br><b>Percentile:</b> 87.7095<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I don&#039;t know why people are so down on this movie. I think that it is a great movie. I really love the camera style which a thing very unique to this movie, also the fact that you are seeing this giant, epic story one four people&#039;s point of view is one more thing that makes this film unique and overall great.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>District 9 (2009) - 98 - 06 Mar 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/District-9/</link>
  <guid>District-9-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 6 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave District 9 a rating of 98</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/District-9.webp?v=1718547816' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='District 9'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>06 Mar 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/District-9/'>District 9 (2009)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 98<br><b>Percentile:</b> 95.2514<br><b>Review:</b> <i>One of the greatest films that I have ever seen in my entire life. The plot is so unique and the style of filming is so different, it just blows many other low budget science fiction movies out of the water. Absolutely superb.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Terminator (1984) - 89 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Terminator/</link>
  <guid>The-Terminator-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave The Terminator a rating of 89</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Terminator.webp?v=1773821280' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Terminator'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Terminator/'>The Terminator (1984)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 89<br><b>Percentile:</b> 59.7765<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Really intense, action packed movie. Arnold has his perfect role in this movie.  I&#039;ll be back</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Waiting for \'Superman\' (2010) - 93 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Waiting-for-Superman/</link>
  <guid>Waiting-for-Superman-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Waiting for \'Superman\' a rating of 93</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Waiting-for-Superman.webp?v=1732890367' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Waiting for \'Superman\''><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Waiting-for-Superman/'>Waiting for 'Superman' (2010)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 93<br><b>Percentile:</b> 82.9609<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I actually really enjoyed this movie. It keeps you hoping and supporting for the people of the main roles.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Die Hard (1988) - 97 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Die-Hard/</link>
  <guid>Die-Hard-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Die Hard a rating of 97</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Die-Hard.webp?v=1718633967' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Die Hard'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Die-Hard/'>Die Hard (1988)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 97<br><b>Percentile:</b> 93.5754<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Just awesome. Everything about this movie is completely awesome.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Killer Klowns from Outer Space (1988) - 85 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Killer-Klowns-from-Outer-Space/</link>
  <guid>Killer-Klowns-from-Outer-Space-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Killer Klowns from Outer Space a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Killer-Klowns-from-Outer-Space.webp?v=1722608243' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Killer Klowns from Outer Space'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Killer-Klowns-from-Outer-Space/'>Killer Klowns from Outer Space (1988)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 37.9888<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Wow.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Avatar (2009) - 91 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Avatar/</link>
  <guid>Avatar-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Avatar a rating of 91</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Avatar.webp?v=1773821288' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Avatar'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Avatar/'>Avatar (2009)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 91<br><b>Percentile:</b> 74.581<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Although the story is very predictable, the visuals and the over all feel of this movie are uncontested by any other movie of 2009.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Tron: Legacy (2010) - 92 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Tron-Legacy/</link>
  <guid>Tron-Legacy-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Tron: Legacy a rating of 92</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Tron-Legacy.webp?v=1785219788' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Tron: Legacy'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Tron-Legacy/'>Tron: Legacy (2010)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 92<br><b>Percentile:</b> 79.3296<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Amazing visuals, score and audio. The story has some slow sections though, but put Daft Punk in anything, it has to be good.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008) - 89 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Kingdom/</link>
  <guid>Indiana-Jones-and-the-Kingdom-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull a rating of 89</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Kingdom.webp?v=1771913543' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Kingdom/'>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 89<br><b>Percentile:</b> 59.7765<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Not as bad as some may say. But, aliens... really?</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) - 99 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Temple/</link>
  <guid>Indiana-Jones-and-the-Temple-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom a rating of 99</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Temple.webp?v=1771913536' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Temple/'>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 99<br><b>Percentile:</b> 96.9274<br><b>Review:</b> <i>People always trash this movie, and I don&#039;t get it. This movie owns Raiders of the Lost Ark in terms of action. Easily the most intense and action packed Indiana Jones movie.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) - 96 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Last/</link>
  <guid>Indiana-Jones-and-the-Last-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade a rating of 96</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Last.webp?v=1771913531' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Last/'>Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 96<br><b>Percentile:</b> 91.8994<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Fantastic. The best action/adventure movie there has been (behind Temple of Doom). Very fast-paced, this movie takes you on a fun, intense journey.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Apollo 13 (1995) - 94 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Apollo-13/</link>
  <guid>Apollo-13-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Apollo 13 a rating of 94</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Apollo-13.webp?v=1719325479' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Apollo 13'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Apollo-13/'>Apollo 13 (1995)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 94<br><b>Percentile:</b> 87.7095<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Great movie. Although most people know the outcome it is amazing to see how the whole story unfolds. One of my only gripes about this movie is that it is a bit too long.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) - 99 - 28 Feb 2011</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/2001-A-Space-Odyssey/</link>
  <guid>2001-A-Space-Odyssey-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave 2001: A Space Odyssey a rating of 99</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/2001-A-Space-Odyssey.webp?v=1774427018' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='2001: A Space Odyssey'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>28 Feb 2011</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/2001-A-Space-Odyssey/'>2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 99<br><b>Percentile:</b> 96.9274<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Never have I watched a movie that has made me think more than this. But that is the beauty of this. It will keep you guessing days after you have seen the movie. Each section is completely different in pace and each section is amazing visually and staged perfectly.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Casino Royale (2006) - 94 - 22 Apr 2009</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Casino-Royale-2006/</link>
  <guid>Casino-Royale-2006-paul_h</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Paul H gave Casino Royale a rating of 94</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Casino-Royale-2006.webp?v=1775535579' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Casino Royale'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>22 Apr 2009</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Casino-Royale-2006/'>Casino Royale (2006)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 94<br><b>Percentile:</b> 87.7095<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Best James Bond movie.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>