CQ

The problem with this film is that the movie that the main character wants to make is really stupid and pretentious. It's kind of similar to The Big Picture in that way. I think Roman Coppola should have just made the fun, cheesy Barbarella ripoff and ditched the rest of it.

Although Coppola clearly has the kind of sensibilities most critics & film professors would appreciate (the film is both a tribute to 2 kinds of mostly forgotten 60's European films & filled with self-reflexive moments that toy with what is and isn't real) & a gift for stitching his interests together in a relatable & diverting way, the main thing that kept me hooked to this tribute to old things I'm indifferent to was watching the stunning Lindvall play a sci-fi sex kitten in leather.

Good acting, good story, and even manages to leave me satisfied. However it was just kinda in one ear in out the other. Nothing that will really blow you away. Just a nice way to spend an hour and a half.

Solid film. Enjoyed the concept and the jumping between multiple films that were happening within.

Amazing poster very hip and nice story

Homage to everything that's cool in 60-70's films

Decent little movie. Well acted and well shot. A little slow towards the beginning but wraps everything up quite nicely. Jeremy Davies is always fun and Jason Schwartzman is wild and awesome in his limited screen time.

What a bummer it must be when you want to be like Fellini, and end up least successful Coppola. Stylish, but over-ambitious and dull mess of a movie.

A subtle post-modernist parody of modernism. Some excellent acting keep this meta-film afloat. Sure it might seem a bit pretentious, but is it pretentious if the film is aware of its own pretentiousness?

I should have just watched Danger Diabolik again i dont know why i thought i would enjoy this. The Dragonfly film they work on looks infinitely more fun than the hohum mediocrity of CQ itself.

9- excellent, awesome :: a real filmmaker's film

Long stupid and boring.