<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'>
 <channel>
  <title>Criticker: Recent Ratings</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/</link>
  <description>A list of all the films Cohillel has rated at Criticker, ordered by rating date</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
  <language>en</language>
 <item>
  <title>Scarface (1983) - 75 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Scarface-1983/</link>
  <guid>Scarface-1983-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Scarface a rating of 75</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Scarface-1983.webp?v=1775268628' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Scarface'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Scarface-1983/'>Scarface (1983)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 75<br><b>Percentile:</b> 31.3559<br><b>Review:</b> <i>An exellent gangster movie.  Too bad that it&#039;s too long, and too eighties.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Hudsucker Proxy (1994) - 60 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Hudsucker-Proxy/</link>
  <guid>The-Hudsucker-Proxy-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave The Hudsucker Proxy a rating of 60</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Hudsucker-Proxy.webp?v=1721830723' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Hudsucker Proxy'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Hudsucker-Proxy/'>The Hudsucker Proxy (1994)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 60<br><b>Percentile:</b> 15.2542<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Robin Hood: Men in Tights (1993) - 90 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Robin-Hood-Men-in-Tights/</link>
  <guid>Robin-Hood-Men-in-Tights-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Robin Hood: Men in Tights a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Robin-Hood-Men-in-Tights.webp?v=1766647499' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Robin Hood: Men in Tights'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Robin-Hood-Men-in-Tights/'>Robin Hood: Men in Tights (1993)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 71.1864<br><b>Review:</b> <i>One of Mel Brooks&#039;s classics.  This film should be tought in school.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Pink Floyd The Wall (1982) - 40 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Pink-Floyd-The-Wall/</link>
  <guid>Pink-Floyd-The-Wall-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Pink Floyd The Wall a rating of 40</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Pink-Floyd-The-Wall.webp?v=1725718782' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Pink Floyd The Wall'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Pink-Floyd-The-Wall/'>Pink Floyd The Wall (1982)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 40<br><b>Percentile:</b> 3.3898<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Maybe in the eighties this film seemed provocative and cool.  Now it&#039;s just sad.  Then again, maybe it&#039;s a genoration thing.  Besides, i hate hate hate the soundrack (don&#039;t get me wrong, i&#039;m all for pink floyd, but not this piece of</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Scent of a Woman (1992) - 100 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Scent-of-a-Woman/</link>
  <guid>Scent-of-a-Woman-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Scent of a Woman a rating of 100</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Scent-of-a-Woman.webp?v=1720448689' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Scent of a Woman'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Scent-of-a-Woman/'>Scent of a Woman (1992)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 100<br><b>Percentile:</b> 98.3051<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Movies like this (and &quot;The Deat Poet Society&quot;) could have only been made in the early 90&#039;s late 80&#039;s.  So naive and touching.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Lonesome Jim (2005) - 55 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Lonesome-Jim/</link>
  <guid>Lonesome-Jim-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Lonesome Jim a rating of 55</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Lonesome-Jim.webp?v=1751530619' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Lonesome Jim'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Lonesome-Jim/'>Lonesome Jim (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 55<br><b>Percentile:</b> 11.0169<br><b>Review:</b> <i>This new Paul Giamatti genre of regular yet depressingly nuerotic think-their-better-then-everyone loosers is really getting old.  Besides, this film is exellent proof the even &quot;non-mainsteam&quot; movies can be just as a cliche as the mainstream ones.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>King Kong (2005) - 65 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/King-Kong-2005/</link>
  <guid>King-Kong-2005-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave King Kong a rating of 65</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/King-Kong-2005.webp?v=1718720808' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='King Kong'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/King-Kong-2005/'>King Kong (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 65<br><b>Percentile:</b> 19.4915<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Too long.  The biggest problem with King-Kong is that it gives you too many characters to sympathies with, leaving the audience frazzled.  Also, the great dinosour\giant bug fights have a very CGI and unreal feel to them.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Syriana (2005) - 90 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Syriana/</link>
  <guid>Syriana-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Syriana a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Syriana.webp?v=1725113825' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Syriana'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Syriana/'>Syriana (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 71.1864<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Ushpizin (2004) - 85 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Ushpizin/</link>
  <guid>Ushpizin-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Ushpizin a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Ushpizin.webp?v=1745504282' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Ushpizin'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Ushpizin/'>Ushpizin (2004)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 54.2373<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Such a charming film.  In its simplicity, Ushpizin tells a Jewish christmass story, showing the wonders of blind faith even to the egnostic.  This is the first film i&#039;ve seen that has opened the Israeli religious people to the public - mostly to Israel&#039;s Secular population.  And for that it deserves praise.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Mr. and Mrs. Smith (2005) - 85 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Mr-and-Mrs-Smith-2005/</link>
  <guid>Mr-and-Mrs-Smith-2005-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Mr. and Mrs. Smith a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Mr-and-Mrs-Smith-2005.webp?v=1774594755' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Mr. and Mrs. Smith'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Mr-and-Mrs-Smith-2005/'>Mr. and Mrs. Smith (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 54.2373<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Witty jokes, good action and a pretty lady.  Can a guy ask for more?</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Fantastic Four (2005) - 40 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Fantastic-Four/</link>
  <guid>Fantastic-Four-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Fantastic Four a rating of 40</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Fantastic-Four.webp?v=1719325822' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Fantastic Four'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Fantastic-Four/'>Fantastic Four (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 40<br><b>Percentile:</b> 3.3898<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Everything bad.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005) - 65 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Charlie-and-the-Chocolate-Factory/</link>
  <guid>Charlie-and-the-Chocolate-Factory-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Charlie and the Chocolate Factory a rating of 65</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Charlie-and-the-Chocolate-Factory.webp?v=1774268284' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Charlie and the Chocolate Factory'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Charlie-and-the-Chocolate-Factory/'>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 65<br><b>Percentile:</b> 19.4915<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>10 Things I Hate About You (1999) - 90 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/10-Things-I-Hate-About/</link>
  <guid>10-Things-I-Hate-About-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave 10 Things I Hate About You a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/10-Things-I-Hate-About.webp?v=1717773659' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='10 Things I Hate About You'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/10-Things-I-Hate-About/'>10 Things I Hate About You (1999)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 71.1864<br><b>Review:</b> <i>If you like teen movies, this one is for you.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Thomas Crown Affair (1999) - 65 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Thomas-Crown-Affair-1999/</link>
  <guid>The-Thomas-Crown-Affair-1999-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave The Thomas Crown Affair a rating of 65</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Thomas-Crown-Affair-1999.webp?v=1721657949' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Thomas Crown Affair'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Thomas-Crown-Affair-1999/'>The Thomas Crown Affair (1999)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 65<br><b>Percentile:</b> 19.4915<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Super Size Me (2004) - 70 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Super-Size-Me/</link>
  <guid>Super-Size-Me-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Super Size Me a rating of 70</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Super-Size-Me.webp?v=1721744734' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Super Size Me'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Super-Size-Me/'>Super Size Me (2004)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 70<br><b>Percentile:</b> 26.2712<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Storytelling (2001) - 55 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Storytelling/</link>
  <guid>Storytelling-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Storytelling a rating of 55</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Storytelling.webp?v=1721226204' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Storytelling'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Storytelling/'>Storytelling (2001)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 55<br><b>Percentile:</b> 11.0169<br><b>Review:</b> <i>This is one of those movies, that not only sucks, but annoyingly promotes itself as an intellectual film.  ugh.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Specials (2000) - 80 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Specials/</link>
  <guid>The-Specials-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave The Specials a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Specials.webp?v=1748614662' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Specials'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Specials/'>The Specials (2000)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 39.8305<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Very fun to watch.  Shows how low a low budjet can even make a good super hero movie.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Sin City (2005) - 80 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Sin-City/</link>
  <guid>Sin-City-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Sin City a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Sin-City.webp?v=1774341998' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Sin City'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Sin-City/'>Sin City (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 39.8305<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Signs (2002) - 80 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Signs/</link>
  <guid>Signs-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Signs a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Signs.webp?v=1719066513' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Signs'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Signs/'>Signs (2002)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 39.8305<br><b>Review:</b> <i>A very very scary film, that is rare in that it scare not by shouting &quot;boo!&quot;, but by building tension very smartly.  Too bad for the crappy didactic ending.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Shrek 2 (2004) - 80 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Shrek-2/</link>
  <guid>Shrek-2-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Shrek 2 a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Shrek-2.webp?v=1775268642' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Shrek 2'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Shrek-2/'>Shrek 2 (2004)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 39.8305<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Shrek (2001) - 90 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Shrek/</link>
  <guid>Shrek-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Shrek a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Shrek.webp?v=1775268643' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Shrek'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Shrek/'>Shrek (2001)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 71.1864<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Scream 3 (2000) - 30 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Scream-3/</link>
  <guid>Scream-3-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Scream 3 a rating of 30</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Scream-3.webp?v=1778765646' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Scream 3'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Scream-3/'>Scream 3 (2000)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 30<br><b>Percentile:</b> 0.8475<br><b>Review:</b> <i>aaaggghhh!!</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>School of Rock (2003) - 85 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/School-of-Rock/</link>
  <guid>School-of-Rock-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave School of Rock a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/School-of-Rock.webp?v=1718893486' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='School of Rock'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/School-of-Rock/'>School of Rock (2003)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 54.2373<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Recruit (2003) - 90 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Recruit/</link>
  <guid>The-Recruit-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave The Recruit a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Recruit.webp?v=1725459951' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Recruit'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Recruit/'>The Recruit (2003)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 71.1864<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Surprisingly good.  This action film is rare in two aspects: It isn&#039;t grand on the action scenes, but when they occur they are very realistic.  Secondly, the twists are very surprising, and they catch you unprepared to the very end.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Pulp Fiction (1994) - 95 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Pulp-Fiction/</link>
  <guid>Pulp-Fiction-cohillel</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>Cohillel gave Pulp Fiction a rating of 95</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Pulp-Fiction.webp?v=1774427060' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Pulp Fiction'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Pulp-Fiction/'>Pulp Fiction (1994)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 95<br><b>Percentile:</b> 86.4407<br><b>Review:</b> <i>One of most justifiedly popular movies.  Tarantino&#039;s ability to write dialogue is outstanding.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>