<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'>
 <channel>
  <title>Criticker: Recent Ratings</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/</link>
  <description>A list of all the films asher_cross has rated at Criticker, ordered by rating date</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
  <language>en</language>
 <item>
  <title>All the Queen\'s Men (2001) - 60 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/All-the-Queens-Men/</link>
  <guid>All-the-Queens-Men-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave All the Queen\'s Men a rating of 60</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/legacy/All-the-Queens-Men.jpg' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='All the Queen\'s Men'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/All-the-Queens-Men/'>All the Queen's Men (2001)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 60<br><b>Percentile:</b> 23.2558<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I thought that (Matt LeBlanc + Eddie Izzard) X Crossdressing = Comedy, but it got too dramatic at times, and tried to take itself seriously. It felt strangely hollow, and I couldn&#039;t get into it, if not for the fairly good ensemble of actors that tried their best to make it work.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Bobby Loves Mangos (1998) - 60 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Bobby-Loves-Mangos/</link>
  <guid>Bobby-Loves-Mangos-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Bobby Loves Mangos a rating of 60</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/sys/no-poster-dark.png' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Bobby Loves Mangos'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Bobby-Loves-Mangos/'>Bobby Loves Mangos (1998)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 60<br><b>Percentile:</b> 23.2558<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Interesting concept, very much like a low-rent &quot;Outer Limits&quot; episode. Still, impressive given the filmmaker&#039;s resources.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Live and Let Die (1973) - 60 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Live-and-Let-Die/</link>
  <guid>Live-and-Let-Die-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Live and Let Die a rating of 60</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Live-and-Let-Die.webp?v=1721830838' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Live and Let Die'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Live-and-Let-Die/'>Live and Let Die (1973)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 60<br><b>Percentile:</b> 23.2558<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Not a big fan of the Moore bond movies, as I found them overly campy. This effort is just the first step on that road to uber-corniness that is just too over-the-top to be enjoyable.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Dungeons &amp; Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God (2005) - 70 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/tv/Dungeons-and-Dragons-Wrath-of/</link>
  <guid>Dungeons-and-Dragons-Wrath-of-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Dungeons &amp; Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God a rating of 70</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Dungeons-and-Dragons-Wrath-of.webp?v=1748183238' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Dungeons &amp; Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/tv/Dungeons-and-Dragons-Wrath-of/'>Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 70<br><b>Percentile:</b> 37.2093<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Worlds better than the abysmal first movie, this one, while having that direct-to-video sensibility, felt much more like a D&amp;D game put on film.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>A Christmas Story (1983) - 80 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/A-Christmas-Story/</link>
  <guid>A-Christmas-Story-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave A Christmas Story a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/A-Christmas-Story.webp?v=1722003469' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='A Christmas Story'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/A-Christmas-Story/'>A Christmas Story (1983)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 61.6279<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Quite the classic Christmas film for a more cynical generation. Brings up a lot of good childhood memories, and there&#039;s a reason TNT shows it for the entirety of Christmas Day.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Goldfinger (1964) - 85 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Goldfinger/</link>
  <guid>Goldfinger-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Goldfinger a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Goldfinger.webp?v=1722262700' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Goldfinger'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Goldfinger/'>Goldfinger (1964)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 77.907<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Easily the best of the old Bond films - it set the mold for what all cool super-spy film shoud be.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Three Amigos! (1986) - 80 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Three-Amigos/</link>
  <guid>Three-Amigos-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Three Amigos! a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Three-Amigos.webp?v=1719152917' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Three Amigos!'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Three-Amigos/'>Three Amigos! (1986)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 61.6279<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Fantastic effort from three comedic geniuses of the 1980s. Though the kitsch factor is high at times, it&#039;s still an incredibly fun satire of show business.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Tron (1982) - 70 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Tron/</link>
  <guid>Tron-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Tron a rating of 70</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Tron.webp?v=1720880277' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Tron'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Tron/'>Tron (1982)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 70<br><b>Percentile:</b> 37.2093<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Strangely enough, the pic for the movie is from the computer game Tron 2.0, but I digress. This is a classic Disney film, and one of the first to use extensive CGI. The look is so incredibly unique, though the script and acting could use a little work. All in all, a unique film.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979) - 40 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Star-Trek-The-Motion-Picture/</link>
  <guid>Star-Trek-The-Motion-Picture-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Star Trek: The Motion Picture a rating of 40</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Star-Trek-The-Motion-Picture.webp?v=1719584944' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Star Trek: The Motion Picture'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Star-Trek-The-Motion-Picture/'>Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 40<br><b>Percentile:</b> 5.814<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I am a huge Star Trek fan, but I recognize that this film is insanely boring. The cast phones it in, the costumes are ridiculous, and the pacing is too slow for words. the score is good, but we&#039;re basically treated to two hours of fancy optical effects and people in pajamas staring goggle-eyes at a viewscreen.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Hook (1991) - 80 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Hook/</link>
  <guid>Hook-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Hook a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Hook.webp?v=1720621023' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Hook'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Hook/'>Hook (1991)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 61.6279<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I like Hook - it really throws a curveball at the Peter Pan mythos, and Robin Williams is good in one of his earlier film performances. (Would he be outbilled by Dustin Hoffman today? The world may never know.)</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The 400 Blows (1959) - 45 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-400-Blows/</link>
  <guid>The-400-Blows-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave The 400 Blows a rating of 45</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-400-Blows.webp?v=1719584281' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The 400 Blows'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-400-Blows/'>The 400 Blows (1959)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 45<br><b>Percentile:</b> 9.3023<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Maybe I&#039;m a bad film buff, but I just found this movie boring. The long run at the end just went on forever.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Dawn of the Dead (1978) - 80 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Dawn-of-the-Dead/</link>
  <guid>Dawn-of-the-Dead-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Dawn of the Dead a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Dawn-of-the-Dead.webp?v=1786460164' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Dawn of the Dead'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Dawn-of-the-Dead/'>Dawn of the Dead (1978)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 61.6279<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Good zombie flick, if a bit dated. Okay, a lot dated.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Tommy Boy (1995) - 75 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Tommy-Boy/</link>
  <guid>Tommy-Boy-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Tommy Boy a rating of 75</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Tommy-Boy.webp?v=1719239150' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Tommy Boy'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Tommy-Boy/'>Tommy Boy (1995)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 75<br><b>Percentile:</b> 46.5116<br><b>Review:</b> <i>The peak of Chris Farley&#039;s career, this movie made him into a star before his untimely demise. Good jokes, a fantastic setup for the SNL film formula.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Hills Have Eyes (2006) - 70 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Hills-Have-Eyes-2006/</link>
  <guid>The-Hills-Have-Eyes-2006-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave The Hills Have Eyes a rating of 70</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Hills-Have-Eyes-2006.webp?v=1719239296' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Hills Have Eyes'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Hills-Have-Eyes-2006/'>The Hills Have Eyes (2006)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 70<br><b>Percentile:</b> 37.2093<br><b>Review:</b> <i>An effectively gory, if repetitive and ineffective, horror remake. the cast is pretty good, but the mutants look more like orcs than anything, and most of the &quot;horror&quot; is concentrated on one scene. All of the movie before it is suspense, and all of the movie after it is action.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) - 80 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Harry-Potter-and-the-Goblet/</link>
  <guid>Harry-Potter-and-the-Goblet-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Harry-Potter-and-the-Goblet.webp?v=1775500809' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Harry-Potter-and-the-Goblet/'>Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 61.6279<br><b>Review:</b> <i>One of the better installments in the fantasy series, with the young actors coming into their own and the effects and script improving.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Serenity (2005) - 95 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Serenity/</link>
  <guid>Serenity-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Serenity a rating of 95</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Serenity.webp?v=1720621103' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Serenity'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Serenity/'>Serenity (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 95<br><b>Percentile:</b> 95.3488<br><b>Review:</b> <i>An extremely good film, whether you&#039;re a fan of Firefly or not. Well acted, paced, and shot, this is the new sci-fi masterpiece.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005) - 75 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Charlie-and-the-Chocolate-Factory/</link>
  <guid>Charlie-and-the-Chocolate-Factory-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Charlie and the Chocolate Factory a rating of 75</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Charlie-and-the-Chocolate-Factory.webp?v=1774268284' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Charlie and the Chocolate Factory'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Charlie-and-the-Chocolate-Factory/'>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 75<br><b>Percentile:</b> 46.5116<br><b>Review:</b> <i>A pretty good, if lifeless, adaptation of the book. Gene Wilder&#039;s Wonka was more caring, and therefore more creepy when he was. Johnny Depp&#039;s Charlie just seems to try too hard. This was basically an exercise for Tim Burton&#039;s production designer.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Batman Begins (2005) - 85 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Batman-Begins/</link>
  <guid>Batman-Begins-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Batman Begins a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Batman-Begins.webp?v=1773565274' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Batman Begins'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Batman-Begins/'>Batman Begins (2005)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 77.907<br><b>Review:</b> <i>The best superhero movie to arrive in a long while. the cast is near-perfect, with the exception of Katie Holmes, and the direction and writing take the franchise to a new, effective place.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The 13th Warrior (1999) - 45 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-13th-Warrior/</link>
  <guid>The-13th-Warrior-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave The 13th Warrior a rating of 45</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-13th-Warrior.webp?v=1724509778' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The 13th Warrior'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-13th-Warrior/'>The 13th Warrior (1999)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 45<br><b>Percentile:</b> 9.3023<br><b>Review:</b> <i>It was okay, but it dragged a bit at times. The characters were all interchangeable. Omar Sharif looked like he didn&#039;t want to be there. You can tell that they switched directors halfway through.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Van Helsing (2004) - 60 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Van-Helsing/</link>
  <guid>Van-Helsing-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Van Helsing a rating of 60</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Van-Helsing.webp?v=1720621809' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Van Helsing'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Van-Helsing/'>Van Helsing (2004)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 60<br><b>Percentile:</b> 23.2558<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Tries way too hard, and Richard Roxburgh hams it up way too much as Dracula. This film was a CGI-fest, but that&#039;s good sometimes when it&#039;s used effectively, instead of gorging on it like this film did. Shame on you Stephen Sommers; you did well with the Mummy, and then you give us this.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Titus (1999) - 95 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Titus/</link>
  <guid>Titus-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Titus a rating of 95</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Titus.webp?v=1721226212' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Titus'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Titus/'>Titus (1999)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 95<br><b>Percentile:</b> 95.3488<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Julie Taymor&#039;s debut film is an amazing anachronistic adaptation of a Shakespeare play, with a fantastic cast and haunting music by Elliot Goldenthal.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002) - 60 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Star-Wars-Episode-II/</link>
  <guid>Star-Wars-Episode-II-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones a rating of 60</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Star-Wars-Episode-II.webp?v=1774427034' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Star-Wars-Episode-II/'>Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 60<br><b>Percentile:</b> 23.2558<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Not bad, and a vast improvement over the abysmal Episode I, but still needs a lot of work. It&#039;s a feast of pleasant and involving CGI, but the actors and script need polishing, as well as the direction.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Spider-Man (2002) - 90 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Spider-Man/</link>
  <guid>Spider-Man-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Spider-Man a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Spider-Man.webp?v=1774220248' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Spider-Man'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Spider-Man/'>Spider-Man (2002)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 88.3721<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Brilliant superhero adaptation, very much in the spirit of the comics. Though Dafoe&#039;s villain is a bit hokey, the human element of the story is gripping.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Red Dragon (2002) - 70 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Red-Dragon/</link>
  <guid>Red-Dragon-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Red Dragon a rating of 70</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Red-Dragon.webp?v=1721572312' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Red Dragon'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Red-Dragon/'>Red Dragon (2002)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 70<br><b>Percentile:</b> 37.2093<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Not the best of the Lecter flicks, but it&#039;s better than Hannibal. Pretty good cinematography, good cast (though some are underutilized), and it looks way better than a Brett Ratner film has any right to.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003) - 90 - 13 Aug 2007</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Pirates-of-the-Caribbean-The/</link>
  <guid>Pirates-of-the-Caribbean-The-ashercross</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>asher_cross gave Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Pirates-of-the-Caribbean-The.webp?v=1773640923' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>13 Aug 2007</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Pirates-of-the-Caribbean-The/'>Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 88.3721<br><b>Review:</b> <i>A brilliant popcorn flick that is saved by the amazingly entertaining performance of Depp as Jack Sparrow.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>