Kill Me Three Times

It's a movie. thats about all I remember really. Simon Pegg was the only interesting part and he wasnt that interesting. I watched it, it was competent enough. Nothing amazing happening here.

waste waste waste of time

Some film rules. Rule #1: If you think having characters gratuitously say "fuck" is still edgy, your movie has problems. Rule #2: If there are zero likable characters, your movie has problems. Rule #3: If you have to get the third-best Hemsworth brother, your movie has problems. Rule #4: If you manage to make Simon Pegg deeply unfunny, your movie has problems. Kill Me Three Times has problems.

A pastiche of violent crime thrillers going back at least to Pulp Fiction, invoking comparisons to Guy Ritchie, Robert Rodriguez, and Martin McDonagh. We've had 20 years' worth of imitators to the genre's few luminaries, and for every Reservoir Dogs, Lock Stock, Amores Perros, or In Bruges there are a hundred lesser knock-offs taking shots at the style. This, unfortunately, is one of them.

It is a very slick produced movie with an interesting premise, but somehow it's missing that spark. But I'll guess that Simon Pegg fans will love it. Good Sunday afternoon fodder.

That was fun, even if lose threads end up tied a bit too abruptly at times

I liked it: simple, direct, not original with a good execution, with some good things here in there.

Entertaining, even if it can't live up to the standards of it's predecessors. Stenders is not Tarantino or Ritchie, but he gave it a shot.

#17#, exp2, rw2, popcorn, story, cast

Amateur hour

ger; [kill me three times]; ein auftragsgangster soll eine untreue frau eines barbesitzers umbringen - doch die anderen akteure erschweren seinen auftrag und trachten ihm nach dem leben.;

Pointlessly told out of chronological order to evoke Tarantino or Guy Ritchie, but there's just one plot and it's pretty straightforward. The first, bumbling attempted murder scene is at least interesting, but the rest of the movie is just people being killed one at a time. Pegg's character is a cipher, he's into killing and money, but doesn't exist beyond that and is a big waste of talent.

super useless, and violent (blood involved)

A jumbled mess of a movie that keeps tripping over itself as it tries to make itself more and more complicated. The story is basic, the acting is terrible, and I'm pretty sure Simon Pegg's character was written in after he signed on cause the role was written for him, but not for the story

I'm not sure whether to raise or lower this rating because of what a disappointing misfire this is. There's some pretty terrific gags and jokes here and there (most of them involving Simon Pegg), yet for the most part, the film seems to forget it's a comedy at all -- most of the other scenes are bland as hell. Does make the state I live in look rather pretty, though

To give this movie some credit, it felt very slick and well-produced. However, I can't give it much more praise. Pegg's acting and character were fun at least, but just about the whole rest of the cast fell flat, and was far from impressive. The script and direction were not much better, but were passable at times. It's not horrible, but it never finds its stride in a jumbled mess of bad casting.

Simon Pegg's Grosse Pointe Blank with homage to: Lucky Number Slevin, Pulp Fiction, Shoot 'em Up, and In Bruges.

Pegg is entertaining, but Kill Me Three Times will only leave you dying of boredom. None of the characters (barring Pegg's) are that likeable, nor are they well-written, and they just muddle through a lacklustre plot. If looking for a black-comedy, hitman premised film, avoid this empty attempt and watch 'Wild Target' (2010) instead.

Simon Pegg is really the only interesting part of the whole movie.

Plot 7/20 Fiction 5/20 Casting/Acting 8/20 Worldbuilding 5/20 Entertainment 10/20

Needed at least 75% more Alice Braga.

dull.

hilarious headshot

Fun, not exceptional but still entertaining. Simon Pegg is hilarious as always.