<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'>
 <channel>
  <title>Criticker: Recent Ratings</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/</link>
  <description>A list of all the films jlworld has rated at Criticker, ordered by rating date</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 21:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
  <language>en</language>
 <item>
  <title>Die Hard (1988) - 85 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Die-Hard/</link>
  <guid>Die-Hard-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Die Hard a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Die-Hard.webp?v=1718633967' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Die Hard'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Die-Hard/'>Die Hard (1988)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>The Granddaddy of all modern action movies....did every cop and reporter that wasn&#039;t the dad from Family Matters really have to go out of their way to hamstring McClane? Did we really need to ROOT for the FBI guys to die in a helicopter crash?  Not that it was a documentary before, but 9/11 totally ruined this film, but in a way it&#039;s even better now as a joke.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Bourne Identity (2002) - 80 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Bourne-Identity-2002/</link>
  <guid>The-Bourne-Identity-2002-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave The Bourne Identity a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Bourne-Identity-2002.webp?v=1718979465' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Bourne Identity'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Bourne-Identity-2002/'>The Bourne Identity (2002)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 29.3651<br><b>Review:</b> <i>This is the 1st one, right? And it&#039;s different from the other two in some manner, I think. All of the movies should be renamed &quot;The Bourne (Insert Adjective Here)&quot; and you have to guess which one is which.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Airplane! (1980) - 90 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Airplane/</link>
  <guid>Airplane-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Airplane! a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Airplane.webp?v=1766739157' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Airplane!'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Airplane/'>Airplane! (1980)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 72.2222<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I picked the wrong day to stop smoking crack.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Fugitive (1993) - 90 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Fugitive-1993/</link>
  <guid>The-Fugitive-1993-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave The Fugitive a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Fugitive-1993.webp?v=1718288519' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Fugitive'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Fugitive-1993/'>The Fugitive (1993)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 72.2222<br><b>Review:</b> <i>What kind of rich doctor grows a long hobo beard like that? That beard was motive enough to get Kimble convicted for murdering his wife.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>American Psycho (2000) - 90 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/American-Psycho/</link>
  <guid>American-Psycho-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave American Psycho a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/American-Psycho.webp?v=1772091774' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='American Psycho'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/American-Psycho/'>American Psycho (2000)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 72.2222<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Can&#039;t believe I haven&#039;t seen this flick in over 5 years....one would think, given today&#039;s economy, I&#039;d want to frequently rewatch a movie where Wall St. executives get chopped to pieces.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Philadelphia (1993) - 85 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Philadelphia/</link>
  <guid>Philadelphia-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Philadelphia a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Philadelphia.webp?v=1721658578' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Philadelphia'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Philadelphia/'>Philadelphia (1993)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Is it bad that I knocked a few points off the score for this movie because I&#039;m no longer shocked by homosexuality and the AIDS epidemic? I like to think that that reflects positively on my tolerance and open-mindedness.....Hanks definitely deserved his Oscar, but there have been so many other, more recent and more relate-able gay-themed movies since this one, that the bite is gone.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) - 85 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Temple/</link>
  <guid>Indiana-Jones-and-the-Temple-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Temple.webp?v=1771913536' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Temple/'>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I hate to admit this, but I&#039;m pretty sure I&#039;ve been EXTREMELY hesitant to try new foods (especially from Asian countries) after watching this movie as a kid. There&#039;ll always be a dark part of my brain that tells me, &quot;If it ain&#039;t a cheeseburger, then it&#039;s monkey brains and eyeball soup.&quot; This movie turned me into a food racist.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Rocky (1976) - 90 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Rocky/</link>
  <guid>Rocky-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Rocky a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Rocky.webp?v=1775268613' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Rocky'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Rocky/'>Rocky (1976)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 72.2222<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Remember when Rocky is trying to convince that teenage &quot;girl&quot; to stop swearing, because apparently Stallone believes using ridiculous slang terms that no one has ever used leads straight to prostitution and drug abuse? Yeah, my eyes still haven&#039;t finished rolling since I last watched this movie.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Lost in Translation (2003) - 75 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Lost-in-Translation/</link>
  <guid>Lost-in-Translation-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Lost in Translation a rating of 75</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Lost-in-Translation.webp?v=1773731162' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Lost in Translation'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Lost-in-Translation/'>Lost in Translation (2003)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 75<br><b>Percentile:</b> 16.1376<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I&#039;m so glad Bill Murray starred in a critically-acclaimed movie, but....damn this was a slow and depressing slog to get through. How is this even remotely a comedy? No amount of Scarlett Johansson buttcrack makes this enjoyable.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Back to the Future Part III (1990) - 75 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future-Part-1990/</link>
  <guid>Back-to-the-Future-Part-1990-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Back to the Future Part III a rating of 75</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Back-to-the-Future-Part-1990.webp?v=1766741931' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Back to the Future Part III'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future-Part-1990/'>Back to the Future Part III (1990)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 75<br><b>Percentile:</b> 16.1376<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Totally pointless.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Back to the Future Part II (1989) - 85 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future-Part/</link>
  <guid>Back-to-the-Future-Part-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Back to the Future Part II a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Back-to-the-Future-Part.webp?v=1766741828' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Back to the Future Part II'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Back-to-the-Future-Part/'>Back to the Future Part II (1989)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>You know what? I hate the ending to this movie, which is just rehashing the end of the original, as well as setting up the third film, which was totally pointless. Also, I&#039;m pissed off no one ever invented a feasible hoverboard.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Beetlejuice (1988) - 85 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Beetlejuice/</link>
  <guid>Beetlejuice-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Beetlejuice a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Beetlejuice.webp?v=1720275536' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Beetlejuice'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Beetlejuice/'>Beetlejuice (1988)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Almost 25 years later, and it&#039;s Alec freakin&#039; Baldwin who has become a comedy icon, while poor ol&#039; Michael Keaton has faded into mainstream obscurity.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Batman Returns (1992) - 80 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Batman-Returns/</link>
  <guid>Batman-Returns-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Batman Returns a rating of 80</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Batman-Returns.webp?v=1720448625' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Batman Returns'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Batman-Returns/'>Batman Returns (1992)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 80<br><b>Percentile:</b> 29.3651<br><b>Review:</b> <i>No Prince, no Jack Nicholson....still a fun movie, but obviously this movie was made before Christopher Walken went crazy. Get rid of the Penguin and make Crazy Walken the sole villain, and this movie is a million times better.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Batman (1989) - 90 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Batman-1989/</link>
  <guid>Batman-1989-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Batman a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Batman-1989.webp?v=1718547845' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Batman'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Batman-1989/'>Batman (1989)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 72.2222<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Somehow, Batman is even more heroic and brave with a Prince soundtrack.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Blues Brothers (1980) - 95 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Blues-Brothers/</link>
  <guid>The-Blues-Brothers-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave The Blues Brothers a rating of 95</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Blues-Brothers.webp?v=1719585021' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Blues Brothers'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Blues-Brothers/'>The Blues Brothers (1980)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 95<br><b>Percentile:</b> 89.418<br><b>Review:</b> <i>A fun and timeless classic.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Drive (2011) - 85 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Drive-2011/</link>
  <guid>Drive-2011-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Drive a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Drive-2011.webp?v=1718547804' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Drive'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Drive-2011/'>Drive (2011)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Could have used more driving and less awkward silence, but there&#039;s something to be said for being concise, I guess. Loved Albert Brooks and Bryan Cranston, but it doesn&#039;t help if the lead and his love interest barely have a pulse. Also, that soundtrack was annoying and distracting (in my own opinion).</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Heat (1995) - 85 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Heat-1995/</link>
  <guid>Heat-1995-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Heat a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Heat-1995.webp?v=1718633956' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Heat'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Heat-1995/'>Heat (1995)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>It&#039;s great that Pacino and DeNiro are in the same flick, and all, and it&#039;s a fine movie, for sure....but not terribly memorable or distinctive. Maybe I&#039;ve seen too many Michael Mann movies.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Rocky III (1982) - 90 - 31 Mar 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Rocky-III/</link>
  <guid>Rocky-III-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Rocky III a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Rocky-III.webp?v=1775268618' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Rocky III'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>31 Mar 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Rocky-III/'>Rocky III (1982)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 72.2222<br><b>Review:</b> <i>The original might be a better movie, but Rocky III is a lot more fun. Chalk it up to all the fool-pitying.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Children of Men (2006) - 90 - 15 Feb 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Children-of-Men/</link>
  <guid>Children-of-Men-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Children of Men a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Children-of-Men.webp?v=1718547471' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Children of Men'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>15 Feb 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Children-of-Men/'>Children of Men (2006)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 72.2222<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Bright side: no more Toddlers &amp; Tiaras.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Wrestler (2008) - 90 - 15 Feb 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Wrestler/</link>
  <guid>The-Wrestler-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave The Wrestler a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Wrestler.webp?v=1718893332' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Wrestler'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>15 Feb 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Wrestler/'>The Wrestler (2008)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 72.2222<br><b>Review:</b> <i>What&#039;s more depressing: this movie, or the knowledge that Hulk Hogan and Ric Flair are STILL wrestling.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>When Harry Met Sally... (1989) - 85 - 15 Feb 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/When-Harry-Met-Sally/</link>
  <guid>When-Harry-Met-Sally-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave When Harry Met Sally... a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/When-Harry-Met-Sally.webp?v=1719325944' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='When Harry Met Sally...'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>15 Feb 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/When-Harry-Met-Sally/'>When Harry Met Sally... (1989)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>You know you&#039;re getting old when someone who you watched growing up wasn&#039;t old, is now OLD. I&#039;m pretty sure Billy Crystal isn&#039;t 70 years old yet, but he got OLD.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988) - 95 - 15 Feb 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Who-Framed-Roger-Rabbit/</link>
  <guid>Who-Framed-Roger-Rabbit-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Who Framed Roger Rabbit a rating of 95</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Who-Framed-Roger-Rabbit.webp?v=1719066310' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Who Framed Roger Rabbit'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>15 Feb 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Who-Framed-Roger-Rabbit/'>Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 95<br><b>Percentile:</b> 89.418<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>WALL·E (2008) - 90 - 15 Feb 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/WALLE/</link>
  <guid>WALLE-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave WALL·E a rating of 90</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/WALLE.webp?v=1775535585' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='WALL·E'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>15 Feb 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/WALLE/'>WALL·E (2008)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 90<br><b>Percentile:</b> 72.2222<br><b>Review:</b> <i></i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>Up in the Air (2009) - 85 - 15 Feb 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/Up-in-the-Air/</link>
  <guid>Up-in-the-Air-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave Up in the Air a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/Up-in-the-Air.webp?v=1719412048' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='Up in the Air'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>15 Feb 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/Up-in-the-Air/'>Up in the Air (2009)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>I imagine that, in between shooting movies, George Clooney flies around the world, and sleeps with the prettiest woman on each flight. That&#039;s straight ballin&#039; right there.</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>The Truman Show (1998) - 85 - 15 Feb 2012</title>
  <link>https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Truman-Show/</link>
  <guid>The-Truman-Show-jlworld</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
  <description>jlworld gave The Truman Show a rating of 85</description>
  <content:encoded>
   <![CDATA[
    <div style='margin:10px;border:1px #A3A3A3 solid;padding: 5px;'><img src='https://www.criticker.com/img/films/posters/80/The-Truman-Show.webp?v=1774341995' style='float:right;margin: 5px;' alt='The Truman Show'><span style='font-size:8pt;'>15 Feb 2012</span><br><b><a href='https://www.criticker.com/film/The-Truman-Show/'>The Truman Show (1998)</a></b><br><br><b>Rating:</b> 85<br><b>Percentile:</b> 50.2646<br><b>Review:</b> <i>Wonder what would have happened if Truman grew up to be a pedophile or a serial killer...would the producers have seen the signs and ended the show before he did anything, or would they sit back and see what happens?</i><div style='clear:both;background-color: #A3A3A3; font-size:9pt; padding: 5px;'><a href='https://www.criticker.com/'>Criticker.com</a> - the Best Film Recommendations on the Net!</div></div>
    ]]>
  </content:encoded>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>