sign in
register
Watch
Netflix fuboTV Paramount Plus
+10
3:10 to Yuma
3:10 to Yuma
+10
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
3:10 to Yuma

3:10 to Yuma

2007
Drama, Crime
2h 2m
A small-time rancher agrees to hold a captured outlaw who's awaiting a train to go to court in Yuma. A battle of wills ensues as the outlaw tries to psych out the rancher. (imdb)

Directed by:

James Mangold

Screenwriter:

Elmore Leonard, Michael Brandt, Halsted Welles, Derek Haas

Starring:

Luke Wilson, Christian Bale, Russell Crowe, Ben Foster, Vinessa Shaw, Peter Fonda, Dallas Roberts, Alan Tudyk, Gretchen Mol, Logan Lerman, Kevin Durand, Chris Browning

Genres:

Drama, Crime, Action, Western

Country:

USA

Languages:

English, Chinese
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

3:10 to Yuma

2007
Drama, Crime
2h 2m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 58.49% from 7163 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(7218)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
gritGrit
Rated 13 Nov 2007
87
93rd
A true western epic. Stunning and acted brilliantly from start to finish, 3:10 makes an excellent first impression, one which never ceases to fade away thanks to a gripping plotline, spectacular gun-slinging sequences, very interesting characters and great direction. Coupled with a brilliant soundtrack and an excellent cast 3:10 has single-handedly resurrected the genre. The western has had a long time to be perfected, but this is one of the small few which can claim to have truly cracked it.
Rated 13 Nov 2007
xakkmasterXakkMaster
Rated 11 Apr 2012
96
97th
Having played Red Dead Redemption, it's easy to see this was a stylistic influence; the music and framing of gun battles, especially. It had everything I look for in a Western of this kind: Gritty badlands and lightning-fast action aided by an incredible cast of characters; notably Bale, Crowe and Foster. Well-scripted discussions of morality, honor & respect make the complicated relationship between rancher and outlaw grow at a believable pace. For me that made the ending intense and poignant.
Rated 11 Apr 2012
andaybandayb
Rated 17 Nov 2008
50
27th
This is, without a doubt, a very lame attempt at western. The dialogue is sub par, the acting is stale (even from Bale), the musical score is forgettable. Russell Crowe's portrayal of "the cool criminal" is exceptionally annoying and pushing believability. I guess the producers didn't receive the memo, the western genre was concluded with Eastwood's Unforgiven.
Rated 17 Nov 2008
farzanFarzan
Rated 16 Jan 2008
85
83rd
3:10 To Yuma was a terrifically acted film. It is very slow off the start but the pacing starts to build up around halfway through, and the action sequences and ending were all fantastic.
Rated 16 Jan 2008
wicheWiche
Rated 22 Dec 2008
91
96th
They'll hang me in the morning.. Loved the part when they sang it for the first time. Loved the entire film actually. There aren't much films in this genre, and surely not many good westerns. But this is one of the best westerns I've ever seen. The shoot scenes are awesome, Christian Bale is great and Russell Crowe.. I love the way he plays the gentleman-killer. His character is one of the best I've seen lately in movies. Good remake! What do I say? Great remake!
Rated 22 Dec 2008
schwabeschwabe
Rated 19 Jun 2015
75
30th
even though that i am not a fan of westerns, i thought this one was good. it is not so the run of the mill kind of western, i guess that's what i liked. good story and well acted!
Rated 19 Jun 2015
paxtonPaxton
Rated 18 Dec 2013
94
94th
Maybe if theaters were littered with Westerns this one would slip by as an average to above average film. But Westerns are few and far between, and this one is really refreshing.
Rated 18 Dec 2013
leonardisLeonardis
Rated 17 Jul 2013
93
74th
I thought this was a very solid western, 3:10 to Yuma had a great director and an excellent screenplay to make it a great movie. The stars are also excellent. Worth watching once.
Rated 17 Jul 2013
kojilessKojiless
Rated 01 Jun 2013
88
90th
More like 3:17-with-a-6-minute-layover-to-allow-for-exposition to Yuma.
Rated 01 Jun 2013
shalevshalev
Rated 01 Sep 2011
83
70th
Very well-made western, quite gripping and entertaining, Bale was outstanding as always, and Foster was great as well. Crowe on the other hand, just did his usual routine. However what prevents this movie from really being great is the completely eye-roll inducing second half which reminded me a lot of High Noon (in a bad way).
Rated 01 Sep 2011
hellboy76hellboy76
Rated 20 Sep 2010
73
88th
A solid western with a decent script, good acting and great directing.
Rated 20 Sep 2010
filmfreak88filmfreak88
Rated 11 Sep 2010
80
78th
An effective, very well-done remake.
Rated 11 Sep 2010
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 26 May 2010
7
64th
Damn good modern western. Its a remake and I haven't as yet seen the original but from a first impression 3:10 impresses greatly. Lots of terrific and varied characters who are all acted superbly.
Rated 26 May 2010
cinemaasiaCinema_Asia
Rated 11 Feb 2010
70
56th
Overall decent western and OK acting but the action and character motivations were completely hokey. The best thing about this film is Ben Foster stealing scenes left and right from the two big co-stars. It's not a bad film just really forgettable and predictable.
Rated 11 Feb 2010
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 01 Aug 2009
80
84th
Quality modern Western. Great performances, heartpounding storyline and some inspired casting and direction. Mangold continues to show that he is very talented.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
timmotimmo
Rated 09 Dec 2008
90
66th
A little long, but still really enjoyable. I highly recommend a viewing of it.
Rated 09 Dec 2008
jstryjstry
Rated 08 Dec 2008
86
80th
I have to say, I was a bundle of nerves throughout the entire film. There was no break from it because Crowe's character was so wild and unpredictable that he was capable of almost anything at any moment. Acting was great all around, really well-cast. I'm still not sure how I feel about the ending, but I was glad that it was definitive anyway. I really have no interest in Westerns in any way, shape, or form, but this one really held my interest and tugged at the heartstrings.
Rated 08 Dec 2008
mentaculusMentaculus
Rated 02 Sep 2008
84
80th
Crowe and Bale are not really acting, as much as playing themselves very well, in this very good remake. Eastwood's insistence that the Western is less about action than about the morality of the gunplay is fully evident here, and proof that the Western is not yet dead, though the idealism still is. The only thing holding this film back are one-dimensional secondary characters (including an all-too-emo son figure), but the leads are so strong, it hardly matters.
Rated 02 Sep 2008
tripwyreTripwyre
Rated 01 Sep 2008
83
81st
Mangold joins John Hillcoat in the ranks of modern directors who still know how to make damn good westerns. The score and cinematography are both quite good, but it's the acting that takes this morality play to the next level. Foster adds another formidable villain to his resume, but Crowe outdoes him as Ben Wade, creating one of the most well-rounded villains in recent memory. Bale hits all the right notes, and the chemistry between the two leads is dynamite. A fine film, and what an ending.
Rated 01 Sep 2008
jebJeb
Rated 25 Jul 2008
86
73rd
Christian Bale and Russel Crowe give us stunning, Oscar-worthy performances, and 3:10 to Yuma is mainly to me, completely incomprehensible. To top that up, it features un-matched gun-slinging marathons, a nice gritty plotline and all in all it's a true 100% western masterpiece that even the slightest fan will go out pleased. Better than the dull original and it single-handely revived the beaten-to-holy hell genre it came from. Solid and one of the best of 07.
Rated 25 Jul 2008
biffjusticeBiffJustice
Rated 15 Jun 2008
46
16th
Some good acting on Crowe's part still can't save this mess of a film with Bale at his worst, and a finale which defies logic and all previous character development just to give us a big whizz-bang finish.
Rated 15 Jun 2008
luna6ixLuna6ix
Rated 19 May 2008
84
86th
a damn good western, and a great story. i have no bad things to say about the acting or plot, but it can be a bit slow and the end is a real downer.
Rated 19 May 2008
kavuKavu
Rated 07 Feb 2008
86
87th
Everything you want from a western. Great acting, good action and a gripping plot with some chases in it.
Rated 07 Feb 2008
agentsnipeAgentSnipe
Rated 02 Feb 2008
91
98th
3:10 to Yuma is easily the best western in years. The DVD cover says best since Unforgiven, but I'd also give credit to Open Range. A successful western is rare in today's cinema, but 3:10 to Yuma is fun, evenly paced, and is anchored by a great cast lead by Russell Crowe and Chrisitan Bale, with some great supporting performances by Ben Foster, Peter Fonda, and Alan Tudyk. The only things that take me out of the movie are the sequences that involve huge explosions and a cameo by Luke Wilson.
Rated 02 Feb 2008
torontodogtorontodog
Rated 31 Jan 2008
70
66th
Well made, but the plot is preposterous.
Rated 31 Jan 2008
psixaospsiXaos
Rated 09 Jan 2008
70
52nd
Good work on a risky job but lacked a bit of spirit I think.
Rated 09 Jan 2008
turinturin
Rated 12 Nov 2007
53
26th
Don't make the mistake of thinking of it as a retelling the story from the '57 classic film - it's different in many ways, with inclinations more towards action/road film then to a character study, and is much more romantic/idealistic then the original, somewhat surprising considering how simplistic the westerns tended to be back then. For me, it's another sad example of how very decent acting, costumes and filming never will make up for holes in the screenplay.
Rated 12 Nov 2007
battletoadBattleToad
Rated 22 Oct 2007
95
97th
Half of a decade after the original, this 3:10 to Yuma is a completely new experience. On top of a healthy serving of action and visual splendor, the acting is top notch, delivering the outstanding dialog in a manner that is befitting of the story's deeply psychological tones. Awesome!
Rated 22 Oct 2007
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 10 Sep 2007
72
57th
Russell Crowe and Christian Bale carry this western remake, an otherwise standard affair. The action sequences are far enough apart and well staged, but there's nothing exceptional to rave about other than the two lead performances. Maybe had the ending not been so contrived, I may have enjoyed it even more.
Rated 10 Sep 2007
pilgermannpilgermann
Rated 07 Sep 2007
80
76th
I haven't seen the original film adaptation, so I can't do any sort of comparison, but I don't imagine it being better than this. This is a really good Western. It's often thrilling and intense, if just slightly over the top, and the lead performances from Crowe and Bale are really good, and the rest of the cast do a great job, too. Fine entertainment.
Rated 07 Sep 2007
commanderlCommanderL
Rated 02 Nov 2024
82
52nd
such a well made film with great performances
Rated 02 Nov 2024
nargNarg
Rated 12 Oct 2024
53
43rd
I wanted emo son to die. I laughed when Crowe threw an old man off a cliff. Not particularly beautiful to look at.
Rated 12 Oct 2024
enigmazweb24enigmazweb24
Rated 28 Sep 2023
93
70th
A great gunslinging western backed by fantastic performances. The character motivations don't make much sense, but I was too busy being entertained to care.
Rated 28 Sep 2023
scribScrib
Rated 24 Jun 2022
65
42nd
The original is a classic western that I'm not so crazy about. Too corny in execution. I hoped James Mangold would bring some grit, which there's a small helping of, but it still retains the corniness; just a distinctly 00's corniness. And adding the son as a main character? Oh my, please no. Horrid decision. Crowe does alright; Bale is just a gruff and mopey semi-batman with a twist of insecurity and falsely accused cowardice. In both versions, it's the story and relational aspects that shine.
Rated 24 Jun 2022
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 17 Oct 2021
40
3rd
Ilikehowhekilledmorallyfewtimes+actuallyhelpsgetontrain/escapedbefore-butpartnerkillshim-sokillsall/credittohisson+cuzhesaidbeenlyingtoson/notsayinghegotfootshotoffbyownman/nobattleetc
Rated 17 Oct 2021
bookhouseboybookhouseboy
Rated 31 Aug 2021
63
80th
#21#, exp3, rw3, story, ratings, director Mangold, actors.
Rated 31 Aug 2021
dreadpirateDreadPirate
Rated 30 Apr 2020
85
60th
A white-knuckle Western remake, starring an intense Christian Bale and a super enjoyable Russel Crowe, and the always fantastic Ben Foster. A farmer (Bale) on the edge of bankruptcy takes the job of escorting a notorious and wanted scoundrel (Crowe) to the train depot where he will be taken to stand trial for his life of crime: the farmer doesn't get paid if the criminal doesn't make it, and EVERYONE wants the criminal dead.
Rated 30 Apr 2020
matthagenmatthagen
Rated 14 Mar 2020
73
88th
Seen: 2.
Rated 14 Mar 2020
moribunnyMoribunny
Rated 05 Nov 2019
48
36th
For an aughties remake, this isn't really the worst I've seen - not that the original wasn't respectable. It's highly contrived, and characters' motivations are incomprehensible, choice after choice they make, but it's decently entertaining.
Rated 05 Nov 2019
lance20000lance20000
Rated 22 Aug 2019
90
79th
Surprisingly good. Crow and Bale provide amazing performances.
Rated 22 Aug 2019
fenixdownfenixdown
Rated 18 May 2019
65
24th
Good action sequences, but otherwise not worth watching over the original.
Rated 18 May 2019
capodelnullacapodelnulla
Rated 30 Mar 2019
60
39th
"even bad men love their mamas" gibi repliklere rağmen işliyor diye düşünürken final sağolsun hikayenin kendisinin pulp'tan çıkma olduğunu fark ettiriyor, ama sorun şu ki mangold film boyu tam olarak bundan kaçıyor. politik/ahlaki bağlantılara dair bir şey söyleme fırsatı olarak gördüğü için haddinden fazla ciddi yaklaşıyor belki fakat anlatının etkisi konusunda fena yanılıyor. iyi ama yanlış çekilebilirse bir şey, işte o bu. crowe'un imajını iyi kullanıyor.
Rated 30 Mar 2019
fmoraesfmoraes
Rated 24 Mar 2018
60
31st
2018/03/24
Rated 24 Mar 2018
emrekayranciemrekayranci
Rated 18 Jan 2018
85
90th
son yillarda cekilen en iyi western...
Rated 18 Jan 2018
soaptastesokSoapTastesOk
Rated 10 Dec 2017
80
38th
Best western in 2000s.
Rated 10 Dec 2017
kito1kito1
Rated 15 Mar 2017
50
24th
Too stylized for a real western - not only visuals, the performances and the camerawork too. It is a good film but nothing special.
Rated 15 Mar 2017
seenmanyseenmany
Rated 29 Dec 2016
73
28th
ndont remb much but nothing to learn from it
Rated 29 Dec 2016
arossaross
Rated 21 Nov 2016
97
96th
probably obscene to say but My favorite western
Rated 21 Nov 2016
philamentalphilamental
Rated 25 Aug 2016
80
80th
Haven't seen for years. Placeholder score until I can rewatch
Rated 25 Aug 2016
rymRYM
Rated 29 Mar 2015
66
62nd
3.29/5
Rated 29 Mar 2015
delizdeliz
Rated 17 Feb 2015
65
15th
try again later
Rated 17 Feb 2015
sirstuckeySirStuckey
Rated 17 Jan 2015
85
87th
Went to see this on a whim in the theaters and was delighted by how much I enjoyed it. Crowe and Bale play off each other well and the relationships are great. Special kudos goes to Ben Foster who is phenomenal. One of the few remakes to truly surpass the original.
Rated 17 Jan 2015
thehynesthehynes
Rated 12 Jan 2015
45
19th
They took a dull film. They remade it. They faithfully reproduced the dullness.
Rated 12 Jan 2015
lonewolf2003Lonewolf2003
Rated 03 Dec 2014
62
23rd
(2nd viewing)
Rated 03 Dec 2014
equivokeequivoke
Rated 12 Oct 2014
89
59th
Bale and Crowe have a wonderful chemistry, the one, urbane, and amoral, the other, rustic and religious. You feel the conflicts of both men, and the respect each feels for the other's unswerving code.
Rated 12 Oct 2014
thorn969thorn969
Rated 16 Aug 2014
48
44th
I don't remember this movie much, although I know I watched it.
Rated 16 Aug 2014
biancazzurribiancazzurri
Rated 01 Jun 2014
90
77th
It's really surprising to see Russel Crowe not as a total duchebag (even if it is only a movie)
Rated 01 Jun 2014
boyd_crowderBoyd Crowder
Rated 28 May 2014
78
50th
Ben Foster owns. Quite entertaining, but no essential viewing, especially if there were more western films today ...
Rated 28 May 2014
jmac525JMac525
Rated 09 May 2014
84
64th
The 2007 remake is one of the best remakes of a classic film I have seen. Christian Bale and Russell Crowe have great chemistry.
Rated 09 May 2014
whotempwhotemp
Rated 01 Apr 2014
86
79th
- 8/19/13
Rated 01 Apr 2014
glm01glm01
Rated 23 Mar 2014
83
75th
83.000
Rated 23 Mar 2014
grayson8Grayson8
Rated 08 Jan 2014
80
72nd
vividly entertaining and perfectly timed, we dont really get good westerns anymore, (well Django but thats rather recent) its by the numbers but its a good ride.
Rated 08 Jan 2014
methad1methad1
Rated 09 Nov 2013
70
58th
Nothing special, but good enough for a watch.
Rated 09 Nov 2013
xalechimXalechim
Rated 16 Aug 2013
8
85th
Enjoyment: 8/10, Plot: 7/10 Themes: 7/10 Cinematography: 9/10 Direction: 8/10 Acting: 9/10 Writing: 8/10 Score: 8/10 Editing: 8/10 Design: 9/10
Rated 16 Aug 2013
the_pirateThe Pirate
Rated 07 Aug 2013
86
82nd
The best acting I've seen from Crowe; Bale was ok.
Rated 07 Aug 2013
chaplinChaplin
Rated 17 Jul 2013
90
66th
Far better than the original. Crowe and Bale work smoothly with one another, and Foster almost grabs the spotlight in his supporting role. One of my favorite westerns, hands down.
Rated 17 Jul 2013
nick-hamdenNick Hamden
Rated 06 Jun 2013
80
77th
Intense as fuck drama. Great Western. Also, Logan Lerman, what up dog.
Rated 06 Jun 2013
vwsfilmVwsFILM
Rated 20 Apr 2013
80
36th
Great story. Wasn't too impressed by the characters.
Rated 20 Apr 2013
nuotionuotio
Rated 03 Mar 2013
62
75th
Quality western with a good cast but something was missing when comparing to remake of True Grit for example. Maybe it was the soundtrack which didn't lift the film or the ending which wasn't really believable.
Rated 03 Mar 2013
theescapistTheEscapist
Rated 12 Jan 2013
60
20th
Very clichéd and predictable. Wouldn't recommend.
Rated 12 Jan 2013
calexicoCalexico
Rated 26 Dec 2012
70
36th
Exciting movie. Really liked the casting of Russell Crowe and Christian Bale. I was frustrated by three characters: Ben Wade, William, and Mark. Ben Wade's character development was unconvincing and frustrating to me, while William's and Mark's situations/behaviors both were necessary to justify the actions in the movie, but their actions in themselves were not very important/relevant/interesting. An entertaining but flawed movie.
Rated 26 Dec 2012
msdstcmsdstc
Rated 25 Dec 2012
89
92nd
Amazing score, and Ben Foster is entirely too bad ass.
Rated 25 Dec 2012
thesaberfoolTheSaberfool
Rated 04 Dec 2012
64
69th
Clocking in at 30 minutes longer than the original film adaptation, this version spends a decent chunk of that extra time on "big, dumb action." It doesn't have that memorable theme song either. However, it also takes more time to deepen the characterizations beyond the original, lending this one a bit more emotional weight. A couple of small steps back don't quite wash out the giant step forward in how well the characters are written here. One of the few remakes that outdo the original.
Rated 04 Dec 2012
gokcanzgokcanz
Rated 25 Oct 2012
83
90th
* Casting, Acting : 9 * Script : 8 * Directing, Aura : 8 * Ease of Viewing : 8 * Naked Eye : 8.5
Rated 25 Oct 2012
adoubleadouble
Rated 06 Sep 2012
88
83rd
It's always a pleasant suprise to see a truly great modern western. This movie has a constant level of tension and excitement that sets it apart. The acting is great as you'd expect from Bale and Crowe, but the real standout here is Ben Foster. He totally steals the show in every scene he's in.
Rated 06 Sep 2012
bruntunbruntun
Rated 01 Sep 2012
85
40th
what style...
Rated 01 Sep 2012
gwulingwulin
Rated 29 Aug 2012
90
94th
somehow Crowe doesn't convince as gun slinger
Rated 29 Aug 2012
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 28 Aug 2012
70
77th
3:10 to Yuma is a very enjoyable mix of a Western and a road movie. It takes two interesting characters, puts them in situations where trust and comradery are necessary for them to survive, and sees what they'll do in order to survive. Their interactions are so enjoyable to watch, even though the interruptions by the side characters are annoying. The action is entertaining, the ending is satisfying in multiple areas, and the film as a whole is a blast to watch.
Rated 28 Aug 2012
zedramusZedramus
Rated 11 Jul 2012
77
38th
Decent western with good story and good performances from the two lead characters, but lacks character development save for the one major antagonist.
Rated 11 Jul 2012
w00dyW00DY
Rated 09 Jul 2012
63
40th
Almost everything about this movie is competent - cinematography, acting, score, characterisation. However, in comparison to other westerns this is a bit of a let-down. The plot is pretty good until the ending....I mean who's buying that? The distinction and blending of what constitutes right or wrong is a well explored theme during the first two acts but all the good work is destroyed by Wade's inexplicable u-turn. Various gun fights and are really good until .....yep, you guessed it.
Rated 09 Jul 2012
carbo_kenCarbo-Ken
Rated 11 Jun 2012
74
68th
All the goodwill from here to Yuma can't extract any sense out of that ending, but most of the time it's a thrilling and trigger-happy ride through a genre that doesn't get much love anymore.
Rated 11 Jun 2012
sirrobbieSirRobbie
Rated 08 Apr 2012
60
24th
100% entertainment, 0% probabilty
Rated 08 Apr 2012
beebeedeedopbeebeedeedop
Rated 18 Feb 2012
85
50th
A great western: proof that the genre can still be revitalised.
Rated 18 Feb 2012
aeghtesadiaeghtesadi
Rated 09 Jan 2012
70
50th
Good film, but modern westerns (especially remakes) don't have much interesting to offer. A movie like No Country for Old Men is what a modern western should aim for.
Rated 09 Jan 2012
troothTrooth
Rated 04 Jan 2012
72
61st
I haven't seen the original, and I know that's kind of a film buff sin, but this one is still fun to watch. The climax felt "off" in some ways to me, but that's the biggest complaint I can come up with. This movie makes a strong case that westerns really need to make a comeback.
Rated 04 Jan 2012
myfavchordsmyfavchords
Rated 26 Dec 2011
77
64th
This movie is not without its flaws but overall I enjoyed it. Bale and Crowe both give good performances. The rest of the supporting cast is also very good. The final half of the film is not as good as the first half.
Rated 26 Dec 2011
thedailynathanTheDailyNathan
Rated 14 Dec 2011
87
87th
This and True Grit are getting me to fall in love with the Western genre. Excellent pacing, and both the main characters (Crowe and Bale) perform brilliantly. The only letdown was the ending, which is as contrived as they come.
Rated 14 Dec 2011
paradiselostParadiselost
Rated 24 Nov 2011
70
42nd
Despite all it's achievements the film suffers a bit in explaining the characters motivations
Rated 24 Nov 2011
jippijaijippijai
Rated 15 Nov 2011
85
95th
Crowe, Bale and Foster are all great, Lerman is a positive surprise, good action, phenomenal script, top-notch cinematography. Another great turn by the man behind "Girl, Interrupted" and "Walk the Line". Better than the original.
Rated 15 Nov 2011
bofbof
Rated 15 Nov 2011
60
39th
Unlike many modern westerns, they know to keep the tempo down, and the gunfights even look marginally realistic; sweaty, unshaved men shooting with bad aim and rusty revolvers. This doesn't really change the western genre in any way, doesn't add anything new, but when everything's been said I suppose it can't hurt to go back and say some things again.
Rated 15 Nov 2011
cmonsterCMonster
Rated 22 Oct 2011
88
87th
This is an instance where Hollywood did a remake and it actually worked. It felt like a real western, but had a nice touch of modern cinema to it. Crowe and Bale are both great and kept me invested throughout.
Rated 22 Oct 2011
davidjohnsonDavidJohnson
Rated 28 Aug 2011
92
96th
Christian Bale is amazing in this. The characters are all really interesting. There is an incredible amount of tension. I was on the edge of my seat waiting for to see what would happen next. Every scene is intense, it never slows down. The ending was a bit unexpected though, it didn't seem to fit with the rest of the movie. That said, this is still, in my opinion, one of the all time great westerns.
Rated 28 Aug 2011
tarantinoleTarantinOle
Rated 05 Aug 2011
76
68th
Tis is one awsome movie. I have not seen the orginal though.
Rated 05 Aug 2011
nothingsgoodNothingsGood
Rated 20 Jul 2011
30
21st
Decent action pieces and a blistering performance from Ben Foster can't save this nonsensical adaptation of the Glenn Ford classic.
Rated 20 Jul 2011
swizardofozswizardofoz
Rated 30 Jun 2011
60
40th
Solid and entertaining, well-made, but not all that memorable.
Rated 30 Jun 2011
robosharkRoboShark
Rated 26 May 2011
50
17th
It's fairly stylishly made, but one of Bale's weakest performances coupled with a totally awful ending cripple it.
Rated 26 May 2011
fikrizulafikrizula
Rated 11 Apr 2011
75
28th
Good acting and picture.
Rated 11 Apr 2011
djrossdjross
Rated 31 Mar 2011
45
34th
Above-average production values but still formulaic Western that is not above cheap sentimental speechifying. Criticism seems to focus on the illogicality of the ending, but in truth an air of absurdity hangs over the entire narrative. Watchable once.
Rated 31 Mar 2011
soytomasoytoma
Rated 19 Mar 2011
75
84th
Good performances, especially by Crowe, all-in-all a quite enjoyable Western. Haven't seen the original.
Rated 19 Mar 2011
stevekimesstevekimes
Rated 10 Mar 2011
85
73rd
Good performances. Intense action. Excellent western.
Rated 10 Mar 2011

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...