sign in
register
Watch
Apple TV Google Play Movies Fandango At Home
+5
Blade II
Apple TV Google Play Movies Fandango At Home
+5
JustWatch

Blade II

2002
Suspense/Thriller
Fantasy
1h 57m
Wesley Snipes returns as Blade, the Marvel Comics half-human, half-vampire character he vividly brought to life in the 1998 hit film of the same name. (New Line Cinema)
Directed by:
Guillermo del Toro Guillermo del Toro
Written by:
David S. Goyer David S. Goyer Marv Wolfman Gene Colan
+2 more
Starring:
Ron Perlman Ron Perlman Wesley Snipes Wesley Snipes Kris Kristofferson Kris Kristofferson Luke Goss Luke Goss Leonor Varela Leonor Varela Matt Schulze Matt Schulze Norman Reedus Norman Reedus Donnie Yen Donnie Yen Thomas Kretschmann Thomas Kretschmann Marit Velle Kile Marit Velle Kile Danny John-Jules Danny John-Jules Daz Crawford Daz Crawford
More
Franchise:
Blade
Genres:
Suspense/Thriller, Fantasy, Action, Horror
Countries:
Germany, USA
Languages:
English, Czech, Romanian
imdb More information at IMDb
See title update history
Suggest an edit
Show Less
Your probable score
?

Blade II

2002
Suspense/Thriller
Fantasy
1h 57m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 37.67% from 7282 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(7281)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
barthalenBarthalen
Rated 04 May 2020
70
55th
I have a soft spot for this one. It has a sillier tone than the first with more over the top characters and designs, but that just makes it feel more comicbooky which suits me fine. Snipes is fun to watch, and knowing how crazy this guy can be on set makes it even more amusing. The movie starts to lose steam halfway through as it doesn't really build up to anything worth feeling invested in. And wasting Donnie Yen like this, c'mon guys. Not cool.
Rated 04 May 2020
badcosmonautBadCosmonaut
Rated 04 Jul 2018
5
63rd
This was actually pretty good. I'm surprised anyone likes the first one more. I thought this was better in every way.
Rated 04 Jul 2018
detoxDetox
Rated 30 Jun 2008
55
25th
Stupid as fuck, but better then sitting on the couch with nothing.
Rated 30 Jun 2008
fabfunkfabfunk
Rated 09 Feb 2007
73
66th
Richer, more thematically potent sequel to the schlocky action original, "Blade II" ups the ante with it's collection of goey, vaginal monsters and covert monster ops. An icky good time.
Rated 09 Feb 2007
mkellinsmkellins
Rated 09 Aug 2013
20
5th
I know the first film wasn't great, but whatever charm it had, it's all missing here. The film is just a pointless action scene after another. Everything feels forced, cliched and the characters are entirely boring. Don't bother with this one.
Rated 09 Aug 2013
thedicemanTheDiceman
Rated 01 Mar 2007
55
49th
Good film.
Rated 01 Mar 2007
teddedonTedDedon
Rated 18 Mar 2007
73
47th
Upon first glance Blade II is a relatively stupid movie. The story doesn't make sense, the enemy is ridiculous, and the moves Blade does are a little too cheesy. But after all is said and done Blade II is a thoroughly entertaining popcorn flick that knows exactly what it is and does a good job of establishing itself.
Rated 18 Mar 2007
petrostserPetrosTser
Rated 20 Aug 2017
60
44th
Helmed by one Guillermo del Toro, "Blade II" is a definite upgrade on the 1998 original. The choreographies are great, Wesley Snipes is more enjoyable, the supporting cast features not only Kris Kristofferson but also Ron Perlman, Norman Reedus and Donnie Yen, the plot is very engaging and the twists towards the end spice things up considerably. Overall, it's a very enjoyable actioner, not only but even more so when compared to the slightly hit-and-miss first film.
Rated 20 Aug 2017
vv238vv238
Rated 22 Sep 2018
70
74th
This is not a masterpiece by any stretch but del Toro brings a lot to table here. It has much better action scenes and the expanded cast doesn't hurt either. The visuals of del Toro are apparent as it gets weird, which is good. It also goes to some very interesting places plot-wise and actually makes me care for some of the still morally reprehensible vampires which is admirable.
Rated 22 Sep 2018
overratedoverrated
Rated 10 Jan 2010
57
59th
I'm being generous because of Ron Perlman.
Rated 10 Jan 2010
monkeycatmonkeycat
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
10th
This movie would be better if it had more Kris Kristofferson. To be fair that statement could be applied to any movie
Rated 14 Aug 2007
dunbardunbar
Rated 13 Jan 2011
60
25th
Over-the-top entertainment schlok that is best served with popcorn.
Rated 13 Jan 2011
johnwunjohnwun
Rated 14 Aug 2007
67
32nd
mindless fun.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
alex_watkinsAlex Watkins
Rated 11 Nov 2015
2
15th
Watchable but goofy particularly compared to how self-assured and relatively serious the first film was.
Rated 11 Nov 2015
yiannosYiannos
Rated 08 Jul 2014
68
66th
Solid action-horror hybrid that is still rather unique. Del Toro, with the help of Carol Spier, creates wonderfully dank and dim warehouse and sewer environments to stage bloody violent mayhem. Snipes is more confident in the role than he was in the original and Luke Goss makes a surprisingly good villain. The makeup effects are still quite impressive, and the design of the vampire's bifurcated jaw with protruding tongue--seemingly inspired by Alien--was a nice touch.
Rated 08 Jul 2014
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 04 Sep 2015
95
63rd
Mexican horror maestro Guillermo del Toro morphs allows the titular vampire hunter into the king of all insects. Even when del Toro is under studio control, there's no suppressing his spiritual, entomological freaky-deakyness. In Blade II, signature del Toro obsessions are on fierce display: a monarch's fear of aging, his incessant desire to suspend time and his messianic opponent's own conflicted sense of past and future.
Rated 04 Sep 2015
the_pirateThe Pirate
Rated 17 Apr 2012
80
60th
Just as good as the first. There's a few inconsistencies and some fairly bad dialogue, but del Toro really knows how to deliver interesting creatures, awesome action, and as always, Snipes is a perfect fit for the role.
Rated 17 Apr 2012
neonmanNeonman
Rated 14 Sep 2010
81
66th
This film ACTUALLY has the "wounded mentor throws protagonist dark sunglasses and he catches them with one hand and puts them on before battling the final boss". How awesome is that!
Rated 14 Sep 2010
gravymaximusGravyMaximus
Rated 14 Aug 2007
55
39th
Score should be lower. But oh hey what's up Ron Perlman?
Rated 14 Aug 2007
billyshearsBillyShears
Rated 11 Aug 2015
75
65th
Blade turns into a cartoon lump whenever there's an action scene.
Rated 11 Aug 2015
paxtonPaxton
Rated 24 Jan 2012
50
21st
It's probably around the time when Blade has to dive into a pool of blood to replenish himself that you'll realize that this is a dark movie.
Rated 24 Jan 2012
spikycactusSpikyCactus
Rated 01 Apr 2018
80
78th
Top badass moment? Along with (most of) the Terminator films, Wesley Snipes makes the wearing of sunglasses, indoors, in gloomy conditions, in the middle of a fight to the death, seem both cool AND sensible. Wish I could do that. They don’t look good on me even in sunshine. I just wasn’t born with a ‘sunglasses face’. And how does he keep them on? They don’t even seem to go behind his ears. 3 cats (running around in the blood donor centre), 1 decapitation (at least) and no chainsaws.
Rated 01 Apr 2018
jarobmuljarobmul
Rated 09 Apr 2022
61
29th
I liked this way more than the first, but it was still not very good. They keep showing you stuff and then explaining what you just saw again for no reason.
Rated 09 Apr 2022
pickpocketPickpocket
Rated 25 Apr 2008
2
21st
Poor sequel.
Rated 25 Apr 2008
hehejajahehejaja
Rated 26 Apr 2008
80
76th
So consistent in it's opulent style, impertinent attitude and guileful banality.
Rated 26 Apr 2008
mentaculusMentaculus
Rated 10 Sep 2008
79
70th
One-ups the basic vampire narrative by having vampires hunted by better and more ridiculous vampires - and we're using Ron Perlman as the basis for analysis, here. I wanted to kill the piss-ant Scud and the horrible computer FX, but the rest of the film is saved by del Toro's visual flair and originality. This is the highlight of the series, and one of the best Superhero sequels.
Rated 10 Sep 2008
sopachuco13sopachuco13
Rated 09 Mar 2019
80
62nd
Blade II was better than the first movie in large part because of Guillermo del Toro. You can see his signature strangeness in this movie and even some of the design choices seemed to be culled from his imagination. I'm not sure if that is just in my head or if he really did help make some of those decisions. Wesley Snipes has always been a great Blade. Kristofferson is a great character actor in anything. Ron Perlman, a del Toro mainstay, made this movie great too. I don't like Reedus.
Rated 09 Mar 2019
rihreyrihrey
Rated 14 Sep 2019
23
15th
i love how the powerpuff girls are constantly on the background.
Rated 14 Sep 2019
purgatospurgatos
Rated 21 Sep 2008
58
28th
Yeah it's a bad movie, but I can't help but enjoy it.
Rated 21 Sep 2008
dakota99Dakota99
Rated 10 Oct 2021
7
76th
While not being as consistent as the original, I do find it’s highs to be even better than the original. It admittedly gets even goofier than the original, but I’d say adding Ron Perlman and Norman Reedus make it fun as hell just from a entertainment standpoint. Ultimately, you have to have a specific lens when watching these days, and sure does character development really happen here? No, but I think we all can get behind Wesley Snipes slicing vampires up for 2 hours.
Rated 10 Oct 2021
cinemaasiaCinema_Asia
Rated 24 Jan 2010
65
42nd
Donnie Yen is better at everything (acting, martial arts, and screen presence) compared with Wesley Snipes but he was totally wasted in this movie. It's a shame because Blade 2 could have been one step away from being a pretty good movie seeing as who was in the cast. Del Toro did create an entertaining schlock sequel but it falls short in so many ways.
Rated 24 Jan 2010
askailAskail
Rated 23 Nov 2006
67
53rd
Fixes most of the problems from the first one and is surprisingly good for a comic book action movie with vampires. The tone is slightly darker too and the story is okay in my book. Great performances by Snipes, Perlman and Kristofferson.
Rated 23 Nov 2006
peaceanarchyPeaceAnarchy
Rated 12 Dec 2006
68
20th
Silly action movie and all, but it's got some pretty cool scenes and is pretty fun to watch.
Rated 12 Dec 2006
schnofelschnofel
Rated 21 Jan 2007
35
20th
frat boy bullshit
Rated 21 Jan 2007
lrampartllrampartl
Rated 05 Feb 2007
74
67th
Oh, man. If they didn't have Scud in this, this'd be such an awesome movie. His character is THAT abrasive. Anyway. It's the usual fare with guns and vampires, except that we have a monsterized mutated race of vampires that our hero has to fight, along with unwanted help from the awesome Ron Perlman. Good stuff, kids.
Rated 05 Feb 2007
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 19 Mar 2007
75
67th
Action-galore in Guillermo Del Toro's sequel to "Blade," a film a tad more lively and focused that the previous installment, full of attitude, darkness, and blood-thirsty action sequences.
Rated 19 Mar 2007
martrynmartryn
Rated 26 Mar 2007
64
36th
Ron Perlman! Wish he wasn't so fucking old now. This was much worse than the first film, and Snipes basically was high the entire time. If he didn't give a shit, why should we?
Rated 26 Mar 2007
stainStain
Rated 29 Mar 2007
50
33rd
Guillermo del Toro can't do anything with this nonsense. No improvement at all over the first one. "Blood Pack"? ROTFL
Rated 29 Mar 2007
absentisabsentis
Rated 20 Apr 2007
29
14th
Wow, who would have thought that you could out run light! The OTT fight scene at the end just looked like a WWF match on drugs (well more drugs than usual).
Rated 20 Apr 2007
naurunauru
Rated 10 Jan 2011
50
46th
Basically the same strengths and weaknesses as the first, except that the special effects and fight scenes have been noticeably improved. The cast is a bit better this time, too. So overall a slightly better film than the first Blade.
Rated 10 Jan 2011
woozybWoozyB
Rated 08 Jun 2007
50
7th
Much, much worse than the first one, and that ain't saying much.
Rated 08 Jun 2007
jetjaguarjetjaguar
Rated 01 Jul 2007
85
63rd
The height of the Blade franchise, faint praise though that is. Del Toro manages to do something interesting with the threads of the first film, but that doesn't exactly make it a deep experience.
Rated 01 Jul 2007
joegayeskiJoeGayeski
Rated 25 Jul 2007
55
33rd
Entertaining, if barely, action-martial arts junker that makes me wonder for the future, which Guillermo Del Toro will we get? The fat geek who shoots average pictures, or the genius behind THE DEVIL'S BACKBONE and PAN'S LABYRINTH. Lets hope the geek version doesn't show up ever again.
Rated 25 Jul 2007
lokiLoki
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
22nd
The series gets even sillier and the fighting looks completely animated in some parts. Still fun for the comic book fan though.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
moonsmilkmoonsmilk
Rated 02 Aug 2016
9
80th
This one really holds up. It's this adorable mix of Aliens, goofy early-00's goth aesthetic, and killer body horror vibes.
Rated 02 Aug 2016
nilay0045nilay0045
Rated 12 Jul 2012
80
21st
Better than the first movie. Great action, good story and brilliant camera work.
Rated 12 Jul 2012
glmglm
Rated 25 Dec 2010
69
42nd
69.000
Rated 25 Dec 2010
grindhousex3GrindhouseX3
Rated 13 Jan 2010
100
88th
The best Blade installment! It's as scary as it is action-packed!
Rated 13 Jan 2010
zoidoidZoidoid
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
16th
Crap. The look and feel of this film was boring even when it was first invented. It goes without saying that Blade II is all action and nothing else. It's just a shame that the action is routine. Neat evil-vampire nosferatu-guys, though.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
bbbdBBBD
Rated 14 Aug 2007
79
57th
Not a terrible sequel, really. There's definitely plenty of action. Blade even catches his shades in this one, too. But... it was just lacking something. I don't know what. Better than the third, not quite as good as the first.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
haphap
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
67th
Though flawed, I still liked this sequel to Blade quite a bit. The design of the reapers and Del Toro's treatment of their story brought Blade more toward horror than the first movie. Unfortunately, Del Toro decided to get a little silly with the special effects and digitized Snipes far too often resulting in one of the worst moments in the movie...the fight in front of the lights. Nevertheless, the movie gives just enough "Blade" to make it enjoyable.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
kw161484kw161484
Rated 14 Jan 2016
87
55th
The best in the franchise. Del Toro brought his twisted imagination to this film to make it a fun, oftentimes uneasy superhero film that broke the mould. Blade showed us that super-hero films could be serious, this showed us they can be dark, and Trinity showed us that Ryan Reynolds should be band from saying dialogue. But this film is great.
Rated 14 Jan 2016
brandonsbrandons
Rated 10 Jul 2012
65
44th
Blade 2 takes what works in the original and gives us more. Unfortunately, plot and character development appear to have been left on the cutting room floor.
Rated 10 Jul 2012
ddrudgesd_drudges
Rated 09 Oct 2013
20
17th
Throws out everything that was interesting about the first movie and subverts it into a very generic brainless Hollywood action flick.
Rated 09 Oct 2013
battletoadBattleToad
Rated 14 Aug 2007
70
37th
With a more pointless plot than the original, Blade II was more about going big. It's still a lot of fun for any comic book action fan. The action was more intense, but the film lost some of the intrigue that the original had going for it, because we now already know that vampires are everywhere. Meh!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
mooemMooem
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
5th
Why did I see this again?
Rated 14 Aug 2007
corncabreCornCabre
Rated 14 Aug 2007
75
56th
Harmless fun with Evil Ron Perlman.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
linda_dLinda D.
Rated 14 May 2012
85
0th
The Blade Series was good, but the first one was the best, in my opinion.
Rated 14 May 2012
myfavchordsmyfavchords
Rated 19 Jan 2014
74
42nd
I enjoyed this one more than the first movie. Wesley Snipes does a good job at playing the lead role. Ron Perlman is a nice addition to the Blade world. The script is average but overall this is an enjoyable action movie.
Rated 19 Jan 2014
squeakysqueaky
Rated 14 Aug 2007
85
69th
A great series of moves. I really don't get the crappy sequel vibe from this. It feels like a continued story rather than some crap someone made up in a dark room
Rated 14 Aug 2007
kdsmoothkdsmooth
Rated 14 Aug 2007
90
73rd
great....best of the serise
Rated 14 Aug 2007
svicciarellisvicciarelli
Rated 14 Aug 2007
60
6th
Redundant, silly, dumb.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
grimsoothgrimsooth
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
31st
What the hell happened here? Did the writters score a huge load of crack after the last film? It shows.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
glumpy99glumpy_99
Rated 27 Dec 2020
54
14th
Dull and dreary action effort does at least have Del Toro's signature obsession with grotesquerie (and evisceration) on display to raise the pulse, but the storytelling is disappointingly generic and Snipes, Kristofferson and Varela make for bland leads (the only actor who brings a shot of welcome charisma is Perlman).
Rated 27 Dec 2020
zolozolo
Rated 14 Aug 2007
48
21st
I don't know...
Rated 14 Aug 2007
smr5354smr5354
Rated 14 Aug 2007
65
20th
Not a bad action/vampire flick. But the 'new' vampires looked particularly weird and it was a little silly doing an autopsy on one of them. It was still entertaining though. First movie was the best of the Trilogy, which I would say this was the worst.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
scribScrib
Rated 08 Jun 2022
60
31st
I'm not sure if I would say this is better or worse than the first film, but I think I enjoyed the first more, simply due to the variety of visual spectacle. This may be the more competent entry and the central premise is good, but both films are so lacking in substance and stakes (no, not that kind of stake) that it really just comes down to how entertaining they are. Blade II isn't hugely entertaining.
Rated 08 Jun 2022
pompousasspompousass
Rated 10 Aug 2010
0
12th
del Toro's earlier vampire film in his native Mexico, Cronos, was a genuinely original and thoughtful contribution to the genre. Here the only newness is in the sense that a late model automobile is new: new gadgets and gizmos, new special effects, a new two-way mouth opening -- vertical in addition to horizontal, for lustier bloodsucking -- and new Cronenbergian degrees of ickiness.
Rated 10 Aug 2010
jdiddy381Jdiddy381
Rated 01 Aug 2009
65
59th
Very good action sequences, but the plot was kind of boring. Definitely not as good as the first one.
Rated 01 Aug 2009
joshk84joshk84
Rated 14 Sep 2007
63
29th
Though the weakest of the three Blade movies, Leonor Varela is hot and the concept is somewhat novel. Norman Reedus does a suprisingly good job in his role and goes a long way towards helping the film.
Rated 14 Sep 2007
dustydDustyd
Rated 17 Sep 2007
85
94th
awesome sequel
Rated 17 Sep 2007
potatoPOTATO
Rated 23 Oct 2007
90
71st
best of the trilogy. action story and acting were great.
Rated 23 Oct 2007
muutanetmuutanet
Rated 29 Apr 2022
69
63rd
Way better than the first film. Thanks Guillermo. Well build story and directing lost its groove towards the end. I liked effects of dying persons.
Rated 29 Apr 2022
glm01glm01
Rated 03 Oct 2013
59
21st
58.67.
Rated 03 Oct 2013
dorkovskyDorkovsky
Rated 07 Aug 2010
2
3rd
Bad. Bad bad bad bad bad. Very bad.
Rated 07 Aug 2010
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 01 Aug 2009
39
27th
Meh...
Rated 01 Aug 2009
npngNPNG
Rated 28 Feb 2008
67
55th
OK
Rated 28 Feb 2008
dayndayn
Rated 06 Mar 2008
60
49th
good, as are all the blade films ***
Rated 06 Mar 2008
gijinGiJin
Rated 19 Mar 2008
62
16th
Good flick, great fun. Mostly the same as the first movie but still cool.
Rated 19 Mar 2008
mr_filmMr. Film
Rated 25 Jul 2010
55
33rd
Same thing as number one, the film has a flawed script and lacks character depth
Rated 25 Jul 2010
lucluc
Rated 23 Jul 2009
75
85th
The best one of the blade's, great action.
Rated 23 Jul 2009
biedronskiBiedronski
Rated 12 Jul 2008
80
72nd
Probably the best of the Blades, thanks to Del Toro. The monsters were actually legit looking.
Rated 12 Jul 2008
hankhank
Rated 19 Jul 2008
60
22nd
OK for an action movie - not as good as the first.
Rated 19 Jul 2008
eastondEastonD
Rated 05 Apr 2022
75
55th
The peak of Guillermo’s career. He’s tried his best but has never been able to capture the magic of Blade 2 again. I AGAINST I FLESH OF MY FLESH AND MIND OF MY MIND
Rated 05 Apr 2022
redo1REDO1
Rated 09 Oct 2008
75
49th
eh
Rated 09 Oct 2008
cultofsamecult_of_same
Rated 15 Nov 2008
45
51st
Who needs facial expressions when you kick ass?
Rated 15 Nov 2008
scragglydaveScragglyDave
Rated 18 Dec 2008
6
8th
Light does not bend around corners like that!
Rated 18 Dec 2008
untrustableuntrustable
Rated 30 Sep 2014
90
87th
The special effects have aged terribly but this is still the strongest entry in the blade series
Rated 30 Sep 2014
seanberndorffSeanBerndorff
Rated 12 Nov 2011
20
3rd
Like del Toros universe as always, but this is seriously bad... And where was the villain? You can't have a comic book movie without a villain...
Rated 12 Nov 2011
shandishandi!
Rated 11 Feb 2009
90
79th
son pedorras pero me gusta Blade =D
Rated 11 Feb 2009
nandorizzinandorizzi
Rated 12 Feb 2009
50
36th
Same thing the first movie, does not add at all.
Rated 12 Feb 2009
beneBene
Rated 27 Feb 2009
68
39th
Very dumb but sporting some of the better fight scenes in any Hollywood-film and quite a few one-liners that work.
Rated 27 Feb 2009
ametrineAmetrine
Rated 03 May 2021
4
16th
I was excited to see what they'd do with Blade in a sequel. Unfortunately the answer was "not a whole lot". It's a serviceable flick with imaginative effects, but it's missing the passion for the characters that the first film had.
Rated 03 May 2021
nutcrackrnutcrackr
Rated 13 Sep 2014
76
65th
This sequel steps up largely thanks to great fight scenes, notably the first sword fight and the latter taze squad. It doesn't slump like the first movie and has some solid CGI when it comes to the Reapers jaws. The squad Blade leads could have been reduced as some are barely window dressing. New twists on ideas from the original work well. Blade 2 is less memorable than the original, but it is the better movie.
Rated 13 Sep 2014
mrsdingermrsdinger
Rated 05 Nov 2011
25
3rd
I love Vampire movies, but this one did not do it for me.
Rated 05 Nov 2011
matthew_parkinsonMatthew Parkinson
Rated 11 Oct 2011
70
77th
For the most part, Blade II takes everything that Blade did and made it better. The action was better, there was more humor, it actually, at times, worked as a horror film, and its story holds your interest instead of simply being an excuse to set-up action scenes. Everything has been improved in Blade II, and as a result, it's a rewarding action movie that's definitely worthy of a watch, especially if you enjoyed Blade.
Rated 11 Oct 2011
ruderude
Rated 09 Jun 2009
80
69th
You'd swear Frank Oz is going to pop up from behind a curtain and pull his arm out of Kristofferson's withered rear end.
Rated 09 Jun 2009
pigletPiglet
Rated 09 Jun 2009
66
46th
Another trilogy that should have ended with the 1st.
Rated 09 Jun 2009
fantacbobFantacBob
Rated 11 Jun 2009
68
65th
A prety good boys action, vampire film
Rated 11 Jun 2009
margustaMargusTa
Rated 23 Jan 2021
62
46th
Watched this after recommendation by a friend. And i haven't seen a first Blade -movie. Based on this, movie is decent action/horror show. The plot is short and the fights between undead's are visually enjoyable. G del Toro has done well.
Rated 23 Jan 2021

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...