sign in
register
Watch
Hulu fuboTV Paramount Plus
+11
The Day After Tomorrow
The Day After Tomorrow
+11
JustWatch
Your probable score
?
The Day After Tomorrow

The Day After Tomorrow

2004
Drama, Sci-fi
2h 4m
An abrupt climate change has cataclysmic consequences for the entire planet. (20th Century Fox)

Directed by:

Roland Emmerich

Screenwriter:

Roland Emmerich, Jeffrey Nachmanoff

Starring:

Dennis Quaid, Ian Holm, Jay O. Sanders, Emmy Rossum, Jake Gyllenhaal, Dash Mihok, Sela Ward, Austin Nichols, Arjay Smith, Tamlyn Tomita, Kenneth Welsh, Tim Bagley

Genres:

Drama, Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller, Action

Country:

USA

Languages:

English, French, Japanese, Arabic
imdb IMDb
Update history
Suggest edit

The Day After Tomorrow

2004
Drama, Sci-fi
2h 4m
Your probable score
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer
Avg Percentile 28.35% from 15018 total ratings
Ratings & Reviews Cast Collections Similar Stats Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

(15104)
Compact view
clear
Compact view
Show
Sort
beedubBeeDub
Rated 13 Oct 2021
72
22nd
Roland Emmerich destroys the world for the zillionth time while sitting in his director's chair pleasuring himself.
Rated 13 Oct 2021
doctor7doctor7
Rated 24 Feb 2007
9
4th
They outrun temperature. I don't know what else to say.
Rated 24 Feb 2007
tonytheponyTonythePony
Rated 10 Mar 2009
23
2nd
Bad. Not funny bad either, annoying bad. Character IQs drop faster than the temperature, but even their deaths do little to warm our hearts. All logic and reason is jettisoned from the plot in favour of production wows that are rendered meaningless. Watch it if you want to continually yell at the screen like a crazy person.
Rated 10 Mar 2009
babbigwenBabbiGwen
Rated 24 Jun 2008
50
8th
I'm going to tell you a secret. Promise not to take my teaching license away? Okay, good. I show this to my science class at the end of the year. If anyone asks, I tell them it's true, and is happening now. Think of it as an idiot litmus test if they believe me.
Rated 24 Jun 2008
gravymaximusGravyMaximus
Rated 14 Aug 2007
45
26th
WE COULDN'T THINK OF AN ENDING FOR OUR SCRIPT... SO LOOK! THE STORM WENT AWAY! HEHEHE.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
chow25chow25
Rated 14 Aug 2007
5
9th
I give it 5 points because it was fucking hilariously bad.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
tripleshTripleSH
Rated 14 Aug 2007
10
5th
Hi. I'm a totally far-fetched movie. I am a true exercise in suspending disbelief. Don't believe me? Rent me and be amazed by your brain's struggle to comprehend how people funded this feces-glazed abortion.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
budleonardBudLeonard
Rated 27 Oct 2007
65
4th
They outrun a cold front. I can put up with a lot from movies that insult my basic intelligence, but that's too much.
Rated 27 Oct 2007
jimmynmujimmynmu
Rated 14 Aug 2007
30
17th
A huge disapointment, and I wasn't expecting much.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
lachapellelachapelle
Rated 14 Aug 2007
8
1st
A movie so bad, that even Lifetime couldn't broadcast it with a straight face. Bad plot, BAD SCIENCE, and bad acting. I'd rather watch the worst Sci Fi channel made for TV crap than this over hyped movie!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
chimpCHIMP
Rated 23 Sep 2008
3
0th
I award this film a point for every unintentionally hilarious peril I can recall the characters experiencing, including CGI wolves marauding Manhattan, characters outrunning global warming, and last but not least an Arctic expeditioner's tragic falling through a shopping mall skylight.
Rated 23 Sep 2008
mentoMento
Rated 14 Aug 2007
45
5th
WE DIDN'T LISTEN
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ninjamonkeyninjamonkey
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
5th
Look at the pretty effects we can make!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
grimsoothgrimsooth
Rated 14 Aug 2007
14
2nd
Check your brain at the door, this one is going to be a bruiser.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
farzanFarzan
Rated 08 Feb 2007
30
17th
Watch the South Park episode, Two days before the Day After Tommorow. Its a lot better.
Rated 08 Feb 2007
magbMagb
Rated 16 Dec 2006
0
0th
Some awesome special effects in one of the worst movies I've ever seen.
Rated 16 Dec 2006
brellbrell
Rated 20 Sep 2024
30
36th
watch a los angeles newscaster react to a second twister hitting the towers? it's for a good cause
Rated 20 Sep 2024
mist600Mist600
Rated 26 Nov 2017
45
9th
| BACKFILLING LOAD OF FILMS NOT SEEN FOR LONG TIME -> Scores poss 20-30% out. Grateful if U drop me a cordial msg if U think memory dulled a gem or gave rosy tint 2 clunker. IE. Tell me WHY Im wrong & what U think I should score "
Rated 26 Nov 2017
daansDaanS
Rated 24 May 2016
40
8th
Roland Emmerich succeeds in presenting a disaster. Not in the movie, but the movie itself.
Rated 24 May 2016
desertpunkDesertPunk
Rated 15 May 2013
50
16th
This is why the disaster movie genre died in the 70s.
Rated 15 May 2013
spleenspleen
Rated 22 Nov 2012
78
61st
Strangely entertaining, but then again I like making farty noises with my armpit.
Rated 22 Nov 2012
cmonsterCMonster
Rated 26 Oct 2011
38
15th
I saw this shortly before I became immersed in film culture. I had yet to see a Scorsese film and enjoyed this. In retrospect, how fucking wrong was I? This is a piece of shit.
Rated 26 Oct 2011
freshFresh
Rated 18 Jul 2011
45
16th
A ludicrous popcorn flick filled with clunky dialogues, but spectacular visuals save it from being a total disaster.
Rated 18 Jul 2011
neonmanNeonman
Rated 28 Sep 2010
76
53rd
Screw you, I have a soft spot for Roland Emmerich. I like how this film, although concerning itself primarily in America, does consider the entire world when it comes to this global disaster. Except for Australia, of course, they're all just like "WTF, mate?"
Rated 28 Sep 2010
overratedoverrated
Rated 10 Jan 2010
15
8th
Fucking wolves, man.
Rated 10 Jan 2010
pmanPman
Rated 05 Jan 2010
50
21st
Yeah, this is reality (at it's worst). But still, what are movies for? Must tey all be "real". Come on! Reality TV isn't even real! Sometimes it's okay to watch fluffy "end of the world" films. This is one of them.
Rated 05 Jan 2010
davidblastDavidBlast
Rated 13 Dec 2009
50
43rd
In the beginning of the film you have three scientists drilling the ice, when suddenly a gigantic crack appears, nearly swallowing one of them... ...interestingly, the exact same thing happened to Scrat from 'Ice Age'... But hey, 'The Day After Tomorrow' has Manchester United in it - and awesome destruction. Sadly that doesn't really save the film from being terribly stupid.
Rated 13 Dec 2009
jakefaceJakeFace
Rated 07 Dec 2009
2
50th
lets destroy world monuments: the movie
Rated 07 Dec 2009
away0flifeaWay0fLife
Rated 26 Oct 2009
20
5th
I wonder if this film gives Al Gore a boner? Absolute Shite! Still made a shit load at the box office unfortunately. Fuck you Emmerich.
Rated 26 Oct 2009
frederikaFrederikA
Rated 12 Oct 2009
40
17th
Somewhere in this movie Jake Gyllenhaal gets chased through corridors by frost... I'll give you a moment to let that sink in...
Rated 12 Oct 2009
okkervilOkkervil
Rated 31 Jul 2009
19
13th
I think Emmerich and Bay might be brothers?
Rated 31 Jul 2009
omgfridgeomgfridge
Rated 18 Apr 2009
2
18th
I had a nightmare once. Emmerich directed a disaster movie with Dennis Quaid in it. Pretty sure that sums it up.
Rated 18 Apr 2009
carnageacecarnageace
Rated 11 Apr 2009
30
5th
Cliché disaster movie. Wants a brain it hasn't got.
Rated 11 Apr 2009
masterwitmasterwit
Rated 20 Feb 2009
55
49th
Good premise, nice visuals, sappy to ridiculous ending. Its one of those PETA-sponsored tree-hugger endings. If the movie had focused a bit more macro and less micro in the sense of one family with predictable personalities, I would have rated it higher.
Rated 20 Feb 2009
melvin_smifMelvin Smif
Rated 06 Feb 2009
0
5th
Great liberties are taken to make this scare tactic movie "scientific" but it comes across very unbeliveable. Throw in the usual hollywood inept American Government, some horrible CGI wolves, and wooden actors and this is what you get.
Rated 06 Feb 2009
andaghandagh
Rated 30 Jan 2009
50
13th
The movie must have provided South Park with about 2 years worth of material.
Rated 30 Jan 2009
egbertsouseEgbertSouse
Rated 18 Dec 2008
30
6th
Extremely dumb and cliched. Then they bring out the killer wolves after all the natural disasters had tore up the world! Only highlight is some excellent cinematography.
Rated 18 Dec 2008
stainStain
Rated 09 Nov 2008
60
47th
Basically silly. For the first half hour or so it seemed like they were interested in making something plausible, then they tossed all credibility to the winds (heh) so they could have a series of K-rad FX scenes. Once you give up on hoping that this will be a real sf film, it passes the time well enough on the strength of its cast
Rated 09 Nov 2008
walkaboutwalkabout
Rated 14 Aug 2007
65
53rd
built on the exact same template of Independence Day, but since the theme has its roots in the real world, it's much more effective.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
agentsnipeAgentSnipe
Rated 14 Aug 2007
19
1st
Show me a person who likes this movie and I'll show you a crazy person.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
starsirenStarSiren
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
13th
Blah Blah Blah CGI Wolves Blah Blah Global Warming.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
djfntstquedjfntstque
Rated 14 Aug 2007
31
5th
Totally retarded. Anyone catch the clip on the 2006 Oscar salute to "issue-oriented movies"?
Rated 14 Aug 2007
actionbergActionberg
Rated 14 Aug 2007
40
11th
Emmerich is good at making things look cool. That's the extent of his talent.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
bbbdBBBD
Rated 14 Aug 2007
29
8th
The inconvenient truth is that his movie sucks, but hey, it was parodied very well on South Park.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
slackerishslackerish
Rated 14 Aug 2007
35
25th
Flashy special effects don't make up for one of the worst stories in the history of film, not to mention the awful ending.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
webfoot943webfoot943
Rated 14 Aug 2007
20
14th
No amount of special effects can overcome the idiocy of the film's central story.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
santssants
Rated 14 Aug 2007
75
29th
I know I shouldn't like this movie, but I did to some extent.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
medMed
Rated 14 Aug 2007
50
18th
Yawn, even the action scene's looked awfully familiar, and pretty cheesy.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
alex_watkinsAlex Watkins
Rated 14 Aug 2007
0
3rd
Too many damn implausibilities for its own good.
Rated 14 Aug 2007
ytadelYtadel
Rated 14 Aug 2007
4
44th
Beware the ultimate villain: COLD!
Rated 14 Aug 2007
fredericg54frederic_g54
Rated 28 May 2007
6
35th
This is watchable, shut up.
Rated 28 May 2007
martrynmartryn
Rated 25 Mar 2007
59
26th
Shit science at it's best. It had some interesting ideas and concepts in it, I just wish they didn't try to ground this movie in science. Or use it for propaganda or whatever they were going for.
Rated 25 Mar 2007
mjvmoviemanMJVmovieMan
Rated 20 Mar 2007
49
18th
What a bland epic event. The end of the world results in an ice age that lasts for a few days. Sure, the special effects are first-rate more often than not, but wolves prowling the freezing temperatures, and pathetic dialogue like "Tell her how you feel..." Ick.
Rated 20 Mar 2007
bojanglesBojangles
Rated 02 Mar 2007
5
0th
See it if one of your hobbies is getting dumber.
Rated 02 Mar 2007
skenkereSkenkere
Rated 01 Mar 2007
25
9th
MOVING WALLS OF ICE AND SHIT. I like Jake Gyllenhaal and I like Emmy Rossum, too bad they decided this would be a good movie to be in. (cause you know they were wrong, this movie sucks)
Rated 01 Mar 2007
jazzlordjazzlord
Rated 14 Sep 2024
59
18th
It seems that when Randy Quaid was being given notes on his performance, most of them were "can you make it more like Harrison Ford?". I've never seen a performance that more certainly communicated that Harrison Ford was the director's first choice.
Rated 14 Sep 2024
rihreyrihrey
Rated 09 Jul 2024
35
30th
Idiotic concept coupled with a horrid script devoted exclusively to exposition, but there are some cool visuals and I had a nice time with it, although the second half is kind of a bore.
Rated 09 Jul 2024
pistolpetePistolPete
Rated 16 Jun 2024
75
76th
Initially gave this a 7/10 growing up, but having re-watched it half a dozen times since it really has grown on me as one of the best disaster movies made. Far fetched or not it's told well with a good balance of disaster and human drama. Cool to see a young Gyllenhaal and Rossum 20 yrs on. Quaid is great here as well. 7.5.
Rated 16 Jun 2024
90sdisasterfilmbuff90sDisasterFilmBuff
Rated 09 Jan 2024
96
73rd
One of the great disaster films!
Rated 09 Jan 2024
thatyoungmthatyoungm
Rated 21 Oct 2023
60
4th
Some of the recreations of the global events are pretty good, but that's about it. The rest of the movie is extremely dumb, with no stakes and no characters that we remotely care about. There were multiple times during this film that I laughed out loud at how stupid everything was.
Rated 21 Oct 2023
ceyhunk26ceyhunk26
Rated 19 Sep 2023
28
15th
Plot 10/20 Fiction 2/20 Casting/Acting 4/20 Worldbuilding 10/20 Entertainment 2/20
Rated 19 Sep 2023
spikycactusSpikyCactus
Rated 28 May 2023
80
78th
Top badass moment? The orgasm of special effects; there's more CGI splattered about than even an entire box of Kleenex could deal with. A bit of space cold gets puffed over the Earth. The only scientist who predicted it then selfishly runs off on a stupid, lethal and ultimately pointless trek to find his son, who didn't even need his help in the first place. Should’ve just called Gerard “Geostorm” Butler in to sort it out. He'd have saved the President too. No cats, chainsaws or decapitations.
Rated 28 May 2023
jessjess125Jessjess125
Rated 12 Sep 2022
92
85th
Great movie but why did they do that to the library bro
Rated 12 Sep 2022
ultrightultright
Rated 22 Apr 2022
8
20th
My advice to filmmakers: if you are going to make a disaster movie, just make a cool disaster and people will figure out the propaganda for themselves. Even though I agree with much of the propaganda here, namely that global urbanization and human overpopulation are screwing up nature, I found it hard to take this film seriously enough to enjoy it.
Rated 22 Apr 2022
barnowlBarnowl
Rated 22 Mar 2022
69
13th
Fun to see randomly on live streaming channels, although it might have some sort of merit, especially visually. If you see it streaming, try it from the beginning. I will say it is interesting how early this film is.
Rated 22 Mar 2022
evranaevrana
Rated 19 Mar 2022
61
28th
Somehow I enjoyed it more than I expected. It is hyperbolic alright, but in its weird way, and retrospectively, it was very timely. It has some typical Hollywood action movie warts, but the visuals of the actual cooling parts made up for that. Also, I think that the forced migration to Mexico has a nice political message, again way before the talk about the wall and that. Some things age better I guess.
Rated 19 Mar 2022
war_machineWar Machine
Rated 12 Feb 2022
60
25th
Gianthale+wavesfloodliberty-wasntlookingoodtilhebravesavedherlol+library+nuffleave+burnbooks+confessfeelings-kiss+herlegpoisoned+wolves+dadcomes+bunchsurvivorsonskycrapers+spaceneverseenairsoclear
Rated 12 Feb 2022
lonewolf2003Lonewolf2003
Rated 20 Jan 2022
55
13th
It passes the time. I don't really mind the stupidities and illogicalities. Cause I don't come to this for believability but to be entertained. It is at its most enjoyable when it embraces the over the topness, like the tsunami washing away NY. What really does keep this from being better is E's inability to create real suspense and otherwise engagement when needed. It comes down to that Emmerich's CGI-created disasters are very impressive but not really that engaging.
Rated 20 Jan 2022
hakkanarejohakkanarejo
Rated 12 Aug 2021
95
63rd
Weather expert Jack Hall (Dennis Quaid) warns with little success about the impact global warming will have on the climate. When the planet's northern hemisphere actually falls victim to tornadoes, floods & super-low temperatures, its finally taken seriously. While the American south is being rushed to evacuate, northerners are advised to stay indoors and hope for the best. Hall decides to travel north to find his son Sam (Jake Gyllenhaal) who is stranded in a library with some fellow students.
Rated 12 Aug 2021
onion_soupOnion Soup
Rated 13 Mar 2021
50
18th
Man become cold
Rated 13 Mar 2021
peyrinpeyrin
Rated 22 Jul 2020
30
10th
Remember the good old days when disaster movies were fiction. Amirite folks
Rated 22 Jul 2020
jmjones001jmjones001
Rated 17 Mar 2020
90
63rd
More about global warming. Still, the movie overall was enjoyable. It definitely kept me on the edge of my seat.
Rated 17 Mar 2020
antonio_pAntonio P
Rated 15 Feb 2020
20
17th
Not good.
Rated 15 Feb 2020
gatoquentegatoquente
Rated 30 Apr 2019
92
47th
My SCORING: 99-96=Great; 95-90=Very good; 89-85=Good; 84-80=So-so; 79-70=Boring; Below 70=Forget it.
Rated 30 Apr 2019
theristheris
Rated 24 Jan 2019
76
44th
watchable
Rated 24 Jan 2019
vv238vv238
Rated 22 Sep 2018
33
31st
This fits somewhere between entertaining for being laughable and just bad. It's laughable because Emmerich found a way to tie his ho-hum disaster porn to a cause. This has a message. It's important. Look at what will happen if we don't curb carbon emissions. THESE BOOKS ON TAX LAW WON'T MATTER THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW! WHY DOESN'T ANYONE TAKE ME SERIOUSLY?!?
Rated 22 Sep 2018
arossaross
Rated 31 Mar 2018
51
5th
yikes. really dumb and kind of hilarious. As a huge Jake Gyllenhaal fan, we need to wipe this from the record.
Rated 31 Mar 2018
beautyblissBeautyBliss
Rated 14 Feb 2018
60
14th
I really want to like a movie about climate change, but this just goes completely in the wrong direction. Global warming won't cause an ice age, and certainly not in the space of three days. Oh, and the acting is terrible and the writing is beyond terrible.
Rated 14 Feb 2018
mjoyamjoya
Rated 11 Jan 2018
68
40th
About average in the natural disaster / catastrophe bracket. The characters are all fairly static and heavily typed. The musical score basically tells you how the movie is going to end halfway through. The CG is maybe a bit ahead of the 2004 curve. If average-looking, 2nd-tier actors had played the leading roles, you probably wouldn't find it the least bit convincing, but it just goes to show that a star cast can really sell a mediocre script.
Rated 11 Jan 2018
mwestcottmwestcott
Rated 09 Jan 2018
62
28th
The Day After Tomorrow is a decent enough disaster film, considering the lack of action for the most part. It still falls into the same issues as a lot of Emmerich films. Especially in the realm of uninteresting characters. It cobbles together some thrilling scenes and decent acting from Dennis Quaid and Jake Gyllenhaal to form a well oiled popcorn blockbuster.
Rated 09 Jan 2018
luordluord
Rated 06 Aug 2017
51
27th
The effects, cinematography and a few performances are good. It's nevertheless still too dumb and has too many plot holes to pass.
Rated 06 Aug 2017
u0la95u0la95
Rated 04 Jul 2017
80
66th
Mindless, fun junk...
Rated 04 Jul 2017
pausssepaussse
Rated 28 Feb 2017
56
49th
Watchable. Plot like San Andreas just with climate change not earthquakes.
Rated 28 Feb 2017
yoshinarutoYoshinaruto
Rated 28 Oct 2016
80
90th
I know it’s not a great movie, but unlike a lot of Emmerich’s other films, I found this to be a very enjoyable film. Perhaps a remake would do the concept justice.
Rated 28 Oct 2016
evilmangoesEvilMangoes
Rated 30 Nov 2015
45
20th
C-
Rated 30 Nov 2015
terrymacterrymac
Rated 14 Oct 2015
48
17th
I'm unsure as to why the film's focus is on a handful of folk, rather than the billions who get turned into ice lollies - I never really felt the horror of a global catastrophe. That said, despite some flaws in plotting and scripting (and I'm sure the science is ludicrous) it is pretty watchable. The actors are all okay, and the VFX stand up pretty well; Emmerich really does enjoy wrecking the US. It needed more Ian Holm drinking Balvenie. It's not dreadful.
Rated 14 Oct 2015
alexshredsAlex_Shreds
Rated 13 May 2015
55
15th
I liked it when the wolves came and they looked like CGI crap
Rated 13 May 2015
joelwatchesmoviesjoelwatchesmovies
Rated 10 Apr 2015
5
24th
The CGI, dialogue, and grand overarching plot here feel a bit over-the-top at times, but they all do their jobs in keeping you interested throughout. The multiple adventure storylines and different global perspectives add further intrigue and give the film that epic and important feel, nailed down further by Quaid's believable urgency as the concerned scientist that few take seriously. A young Gyllenhaal, meanwhile, holds his own as the second protagonist. An engaging disaster flick.
Rated 10 Apr 2015
rymRYM
Rated 28 Mar 2015
42
8th
2.10/5
Rated 28 Mar 2015
lookjabbaLookJabba...
Rated 05 Mar 2015
3
14th
The Day After Tomorrow is another poor disaster outing from Roland Emmerich. If he had all the attempts in the world, Roland Emmerich still probably couldn't make a decent or worthy disaster film. It's clear to see that Jake Gyllenhaal is trying his absolute best, but he's got little quality to work with. Regardless of how impressive the set pieces may be and how large the scale of disaster is here, ultimately if you don't care about the characters it's hard to care about the film full stop.
Rated 05 Mar 2015
le_mamile mami
Rated 18 Feb 2015
0
1st
What about the day after the day after the tomorrow? I am going to make a film about that and it will be beautiful.
Rated 18 Feb 2015
tbwTBW
Rated 16 Sep 2014
60
34th
Not a terrible action film, but not particularly good either
Rated 16 Sep 2014
thegreyfoxthegreyfox
Rated 25 May 2014
56
27th
In an attempt to make you care for the protagonists, TDAT falls into the trap of making each character so sugary sweet that you really need to be given insulin with your ticket. Full of nauseating family bonding cliches, dying kids miraculously surviving, "out of luck" tramp and his faithful dog, politicians reaching enlightment on the road to Damascus. The concentration on the sugary characters takes the focus off the brilliant CGI, and makes for a somewhat boring film, which is inexcusable.
Rated 25 May 2014
pluggedinPluggedIN
Rated 15 Apr 2014
90
92nd
Implausibility aside, The Day After Tomorrow is an exciting, morally grounded summer thrill ride full of noble characters that knows how to balance spectacle with virtue and restraint. (pluggedin.com)
Rated 15 Apr 2014
vantroVantro
Rated 20 Mar 2014
82
33rd
Her filmi zamanına göre değerlendirmeliyiz aslında. Zamanına göre kendi zamanındaki filmlerin fazlasıyla ilerisine geçebilmiş hala bile kendini zevkle izlettirebilen bir yapım kesinlikle. Bir klasik olmasa bile fazlasıyla yaklaşmıştır. Neredeyse herkes izlemiştir bu filmi. Kime sorsanız bilir. Kim Jake Gyllenhaal'dan bahsetmek istese "Şu Yarından Sonra'da oynayan adam varya o işte" der. Kötü bir film de
Rated 20 Mar 2014
thereeldealthereeldeal
Rated 15 Mar 2014
20
2nd
Fear-mongering sensationalism made to earn a quick buck through the increasing public interest in global warming. Besides the sense of shame that pervades through it, characters are bland and the exaggerated (or blatantly incorrect) storyline is laughable. Our survivors spend most of the movie trying to outrun an enroaching ice storm that freezes everything it touches.
Rated 15 Mar 2014
chroniclerChronicler
Rated 20 Feb 2014
40
10th
There are some goods things about this flick but it not as strong as it could have been. The special effects were decent and Dennis Quad and Jake Gyllenhaal were decent but the film suffers overall from the usual disaster movie cliches and Emmerich directorial mannerisms. That said, it's watchable so there's that.
Rated 20 Feb 2014
bionicninjasBionicNinjas
Rated 22 Jan 2014
0
1st
Al Gore thinks this is a documentary
Rated 22 Jan 2014
rttntomatoesrttntomatoes
Rated 03 Jan 2014
45
20th
A ludicrous popcorn flick filled with clunky dialogues, but spectacular visuals save it from being a total disaster.
Rated 03 Jan 2014
fra_paolofra paolo
Rated 29 Aug 2013
3
1st
Amazing special effects fail to sustain an earnest film full of bad science.
Rated 29 Aug 2013

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...