Watch
Clash of the Titans
Your probable score
?

Clash of the Titans

2010
Drama
Fantasy
1h 46m
Your probable score
Avg Percentile 23.24% from 3692 total ratings

Ratings & Reviews

(3691)
Compact view
Compact view
Rated 03 Apr 2010
19
13th
Pretty awful and pointlessly in 3D. I enjoy Greek mythology, but this for the most part just sucks. This story really deserved to be an old style "epic" of a movie, but instead the story is crammed into an hour and forty-five, the characters are poorly developed with meaningless relationships and the script is retarded. A few nice effects and monster designs don't make a movie and Worthington has the personality of a plank of wood.
Rated 17 Nov 2020
75
30th
Ever wonder what the original movie would look like if it were made by angsty teenage edgelords? Here ya go. Also justly infamous for having the first (and worst) 3D makeover after Avatar made all the money in the world.
Rated 12 Aug 2010
1
9th
Life is too short for films with Sam Worthington. He is the human equivalent of cinematic nothingness. Hell, he embodies it. I Am Nothingness.
Rated 16 Apr 2010
0
4th
Could've been a fun romp, but who the hell wrote this drivel? Atrocious pacing, awful dialog and characters that are exclusively tools. Who do you root for in this mess? You root for Alexa Davalos' Andromeda, the film's one solid (and sadly underused) performance. Whoever keeps casting the plank Gemma Arterton in films: Stop taking those hallucinogens. Seemingly hours of uninteresting wandering from A to B and then about 2 minutes of almost worthwhile climatic payoff. Avoid this one.
Rated 01 Apr 2010
27
17th
A big budget popcorn action flick littered with a couple of decent performances and a uncompromising plotline. I would've expected so much more with such a promising cast (Worthington, Fiennes, Neeson, Huston) attached. Parts of it looked so idiotic and stupid people in my theater just couldn't stop laughing. It seemed like one big elaborate joke. And it's on us.
Rated 14 Jun 2010
50
11th
For a brainless blockbuster, this isn't too bad - it moves along at a brisk pace, lots of fighting, etc. Disappointing in comparison with the original, though, because it lacks its campy charm and takes everything so seriously. This makes it all the more laughable, since nothing about the movie makes any sense whatsoever. Not just the lack of fidelity to Greek myths (neither film has that), but a) war against gods is a ridiculous idea b) no character's motivation is consistent or logical.
Rated 13 Apr 2010
40
18th
The only thing in this mediocre adventure that works (apart from the CGI and creature design) is the Kraken-releasing-scene, which on the other hand works perfectly... unfortunately you have to endure an hour+ of incredibly poorly written nonsense, which would have been fine, if the director was able to make some gong-ho action, but Leterrier apparently thinks that actions means "people running fast" either towards or away from monsters... A total waste of potential on all levels.
Rated 14 Jul 2010
35
17th
Release the Krappen!
Rated 09 Apr 2010
30
25th
First of all, way to hype up the Kraken you Hollywood douchebags! I think they totally missed the point of this story. It's not about a giant sea monster. It's about a man accomplishing things that should be impossible with the help of the gods. I just looooove how Perseus had never held a sword in this movie and then after one training sesh he's able to take on just about anything. I don't give a fuck if the movie is in 3-D, the plot was laughable and it deviated way too much from the myth.
Rated 01 Apr 2010
2
19th
Pretty bad. Just stupid at times especially with some amusing plot holes. The romantic side of the film was a joke. Only positives are a couple actors putting in decent performances (Neeson, Fiennes and Mikkelsen for example) and the Kraken does look very cool, for about 5 seconds anyway. A lot of cringing involved in what is a big dumb action flick that is pretty shallow and even the word action is being used loosely.
Rated 20 May 2010
50
29th
The scenes with the gods were lame; the story weak. For some reason I got a kick out of the Medusa scene and was all warmed up for the big climacs which was way too short. The monster, though, was pretty cool. Say it loudly: RELEASE the KRAKEN!
Rated 05 Apr 2010
40
11th
the last 5 minutes were basically OH GOD LETS TIE IT ALL TOGETHER RIGHT NOW Ralph Fiennes just spends the entire move popping up in a cloud of 'macabre' and looking into the camera and then speaking like something's stuck in his throat and he just doesn't give a shit that it's there, it'll make him sound spookier, but instead he just sounds retarded. I actually can't remember anything from the movie and I just saw it, OH Idont know why I gave this a 60, oh wait, that one chick be hot, yo
Rated 21 Jun 2010
10
3rd
Watch the trailer. It's ten times better.
Rated 15 Jul 2010
30
12th
Modern action movies continue to be ruined by hyper editing. You just can't tell what the fuck is going on. It's horrible. For the first 5 or so mins of this one scene I thought there was only one big ass scorpion but it turns out there were like 4 or something. I dunno. I couldn't tell with all of the half second close up editing & multi-camera craziness. You'd think that clearly conveying the action would be priority number one in the action genre.The sets looked good though. Better than 300
Rated 19 Apr 2010
52
20th
What a mess, in 3D ! They managed to make the shallow Plot from the original even more shallow. Nothing in this movie is "Titanic". Some creatures were interestingly designed, but the blurry action and a very premature 3D usage made watching them a painful experience. This is especially disappointing because the effects used in the original were the best in their time and they are still impressive.
Rated 25 Jul 2010
50
12th
Despite the big names, high budget, and concept there is a glaring low budget feel. The main reason is the reliance on CGI effects and the actors struggling to act in front of a screen with probably inept direction involved. Worthington amusingly slips into his native Aussie accent in a few scenes. Neeson looked downright hammy as Zeus. The dialogue is also the usual half-assed Hollywood riff on mythology. This would have been OK as a cable tv movie but as a major release it's pretty weak.
Rated 04 May 2010
15
18th
Woooooooow this movie sucked ass. This was my first 3d experience too. So awful. The writing was terrible, the shaky camera work is aaaaaawful. I also disliked the fact that there were many beautiful people and the make-up was so obvious (sorry, it was too Hollywoodish). But one plus (I thought it was bad he played in it.. but still) was Nicholas Hoult. Foo he's so gorgeous. But still, this movie's a joke. I could go on and on about how much this movie sucked
Rated 08 Mar 2012
48
52nd
Wait...the Kraken was a dude? Though everyone told me I should avoid it like a plague of locusts (which, by the way, is pretty difficult to avoid), I really couldn't bring myself to hating this movie. Sure, the writing wasn't Shakespeare...hell, it wasn't even Danielle Steel, and yeah the plot and pacing were all over the place, but Mads Mikkelsen was fighting a giant fucking scorpion. To quote Socrates, "nuff said."
Rated 02 Apr 2010
53
10th
Poor script, poor 3D, horrific ending, poor film. The effects were decent, but that doesn't excuse this horrible film.
Rated 29 Mar 2012
30
17th
Clash of the Titans wasn't an enjoyable film. There were a couple of entertaining action spots, but apart from them, there was nothing to like. The acting was bad, the subplots didn't work, the main plot didn't seem to have much reason to exist, the characters were bland, and there weren't any smiles or happiness to be found anywhere. I was bored more often than not, and I can't recommend this film to anyone, unless you like boring, depressing and dull action films.
Rated 26 Jul 2010
30
13th
Baaad. CGI and plot were really awful, acting ok. Why did they have to add stupid sparkle?? I felt as if I were watching Twilight whenever they showed the gods. I wonder what on earth motivated Ralph Fiennes to take a role in such a bad movie... release the kraken!
Rated 09 Apr 2010
60
40th
Not bad as a brainless action flick. Some good effects (and some AWFUL ones), some corny acting and a bunch of cheesy one liners. Not much in the way of story or character development, though. Other than a brief throwaway reference to Bibo the Owl, and the whole "medusa vs kraken" bit at the end, this flick bears absolutely no resemblance to the original. Incidentally, Sam Worthington is not a good actor, he's Russell Crowe light (and I hate Russell Crowe). See it in 2D if at all.
Rated 30 Apr 2013
20
7th
Saw this in the theaters, forgot about because it was shitty. Came across it again. Still shitty. And whoever did the special effects was really shitty. Zeus's armor was a special effects abortion.
Rated 10 Jul 2010
66
18th
It passes the time and if you ignore the nonsense it's decent empty fun. Worthington is worthless but the rest of the cast isn't too bad.
Rated 15 Apr 2010
76
57th
A great feel good action flick that most people dismiss because it has no aspirations to be "great cinema", but if you're into some unadulterated action, and fairly by-the-book takes on mythology this is for you. It has a few nods here and there to the original, but really it's just an updated version catering to the riddlin addicts of today--and I'm fine with that.
Rated 10 Apr 2010
1
2nd
SCORPION CARAVAN
Rated 12 May 2012
11
2nd
(only) digital effect is not cinema. my shit on toilet is more artsy than this. btw RIP Postlethwaite.
Rated 15 Sep 2010
30
13th
The fact that this came out in desperate "fake 3D" says a lot about how aimless this mess is. You'd think that given the premise of the Greek gods, there'd be more than enough material to form some sort of story, but Leterrier wasn't interested. He just wanted to release the Kraken, and thus it makes a blink-and-you'll-miss-it appearance towards the end. Between that and the well conceived intro sequence, there's no sense to be found, and even less fun to be had here.
Rated 13 Jul 2010
40
24th
It's a really generic and relatively boring action blockbuster. The story itself, even in the original, was never very captivating and going through it a second time makes it feel even blander. On the plus side the remake completely drops that ridiculous mechanical bird character so it gets some props for that.
Rated 12 Apr 2010
30
7th
Will be a fun movie to watch when I can joke about it with my friends as we watch it; as a theater movie it sucks though. The worst part about this movie sucking was that it seemed like such a good idea. The original Clash of the Titans is awesome, but with the technology we have now the remake could have been great. Instead they change way to much of it and spend the whole movie alluding to the Kraken who ends up being really lame anyway. Play the God of War trilogy instead.
Rated 04 May 2010
25
28th
Where were the Titans? And can a dead head stare? And was the craken a man? AND WHY DOSE NO ONE MAKE 3D THAT JUMPS OUT?????
Rated 11 Apr 2010
68
41st
I'm a huge fan of the original and this movie just about changed the entire story, different romance, different motivaton to kill the kraken, different calibos, and a different main villian. I enjoyed it but wouldn't really say it was well done. weak acting and a fairly jumbled up story has the original making a lot more sense.
Rated 27 Jul 2010
39
19th
A heroes' journey is interesting when we actually care about the hero. Not here, Perseus barely does anything adventurous, has maybe 20 lines of dialogue and never becomes more than Blandy McBland. All the indoor sets look terrible, the CGI is pretty weak, and the movie is littered with dumb details. (A race against time.. and you go on foot?) A MAJOR step down in every area compared to the original, except those Djinns. They looked nifty at least. Oh, and disrespecting Bubo?!? YOU ASSHOLES!
Rated 06 May 2015
4
3rd
When the Grim Reaper comes to collect your name, beg father time to give you back the hour and half that Clash of the Titans stole from you.
Rated 01 Jun 2015
60
30th
Slagging off Bubo was supposed to be a nod for fans of the original? Aye, nice one.
Rated 12 Apr 2010
0
7th
Imagine a genie assuming the role of Chewbacca in the context of a Greek myth. Everything about this movie is wrong and stupid.
Rated 08 Jan 2023
48
9th
Well this is certainly a movie, where a director made choices, and stuff happens.
Rated 15 Aug 2011
20
14th
I just don't understand how so many mistakes could be made when making a film with such a large budget. It's like the more money these people have, the more ways to blow it they dream up. "Guys we've got so much money we can have a huge CGI kraken!". Hey, Louis, that's great, but pay for some better writers first.
Rated 02 Apr 2010
79
62nd
One should ignore the critics for this one, I liked it as I am a fan of Greek Mythology. This movie is a top notch action movie and full house entertainer. The 3D was not the best but not as horrible as some say. Sam Worthington is the new best action star right now. It was good to watch Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes sharing screen space, reminiscent of Schindler's list.
Rated 05 Apr 2010
30
7th
I've never heard an audience laugh so much at a non-comedy. Not even the lines, even characters appearing on screen elicited chuckles. Its that stupid.
Rated 10 Jul 2010
55
24th
Those Djinns were speaking Arabic? This film is unbelievably superficial. We love you Mads Mikkelsen, please leave these crappy blockbusters.
Rated 05 Aug 2010
40
9th
If only they hadn't bothered with 3-D-ing it and ither made it properly with ALL Gods or just embraced the silly ("Release the Kraken" indeed). Sam Worthington continues his epic quest to literally turn into a walking minature tree.
Rated 03 Jun 2010
3
2nd
There should be a law that if you remake a film, you have to watch the original first. Boring and confused script, bad acting, bad CGI, horrible score and Sam Worthington.
Rated 12 Apr 2010
50
10th
Exciting and worth seeing (in 2D). I'm not sure what it's trying to say--at all--but it's easy to get a kick out of Liam Neeson dressed the way he is.
Rated 11 Jun 2022
40
7th
It's almost impressive how bad this is. To be fair to "Clash", once we get past the abysmal setup, the middle act is pretty watchable. There are one or two likeable side-character moments, and the set pieces have enough going on to make it enjoyable. Unfortunately, none of these things can save it from its convoluted plot, littered clichés and muddled themes.
Rated 24 Apr 2010
39
15th
For me this fell into the "So Bad it's Good" territory. The monsters were creative but the action scenes were hard to follow. Other than a few nods it had very little to do with the orginal, changing everyone's roles and motivations (was Hades even in the orginal?) On its own merits the film is fun, but not noteworthy. The plot (or what's left of it) is cramped into a short time frame. Given more care, this could have been the first great epic film of the decade, but it fell very, very short.
Rated 14 Nov 2010
0
1st
In the spirit of "if you have nothing good to say, don't say anything at all" I will say that this film has nice special effects and I will not talk about the script, the acting, the costumes and most certainly not about the accuracy of the myth being told here.
Rated 10 Apr 2010
86
78th
Provides more than just the necessary updating in terms of efx. Characters r less 1-dimensional here than its predecessor (& the myths it drew from) & the script makes some interesting choices, particularly in the surprising aggression humans show their makers. It's also smart enough 2 change the original's entirely hollow love story & narrow its focus down to just 2 squabbling Olympians & their human foils. Despite all this, it rarely thrills, but it does entertain, & that's still pretty good.
Rated 06 Apr 2010
75
37th
Some of the effects weren't so convincing, and they cut too much out of Perseus' story. But since I caught it in 3D, it earns 5 extra points for making me jumpy for a good 5 minutes (when Perseus was battling with those scorpions).
Rated 13 Apr 2010
44
22nd
The 3D doesn't really suit it. Bit of a clash of mythology too.
Rated 03 May 2010
70
60th
Check out our full review at http://zoopy.com/q/40l7
Rated 21 Mar 2018
60
17th
Clash of the Titans had a few interesting moments. I enjoyed the fight with the scorpions and the appearance of the djinn. The fight against Medusa was boring and the final battle seemed anti-climatic. This movie had so much star power that it is sad that it wasn't better than it was. I guess that goes to show how amazing acting can't fix a broken script. I think I enjoyed the first movie better because that movie was bad this was just boring.
Rated 13 Apr 2010
60
18th
3-d couldn't even save this, it actually made it worse.
Rated 26 Mar 2016
53
6th
An easy to watch, fun, if heavily CGI movie. But ultimately not a great film.
Rated 28 Feb 2014
60
14th
Sam Worthington continues to be the most useless human being, but there are like 30 to 40 really good minutes here. The original ending is infinitely better, forming the end of a coherent story instead of whatever the hell the theatrical one thinks it's accomplishing.
Rated 12 May 2012
87
78th
Rip-roaring fantasy yarn aided immeasurably by the gravitas provided by Neeson, Fiennes and (briefly) Postlethwaite. Worthington proves to be a likable hero, and the action scenes are without exception thrillingly mounted and executed (highlighted by the monster scorpions, the battle with Medusa and 'Release the Kraken!') Cheerfully absurd and over-the-top at times, but a great ride if you're willing to meet it half way.
Rated 18 Jan 2013
20
1st
Naw.
Rated 26 Aug 2010
2
0th
Made no sense
Rated 01 May 2010
70
60th
I enjoyed this for what it was. Lots of guys running around slashing at stuff, some giant things, some crazy gods, and Gemma Arterton....yum!
Rated 22 Aug 2012
7
17th
RIP Steve McNair :(
Rated 22 Jun 2010
10
6th
Titans never clashed. I want my money back.
Rated 02 Jun 2013
20
3rd
One of my milestone reviews, and where my movie website got its name. But wow does it fail to deliver.
Rated 15 Dec 2011
10
0th
Why is Sam Worthington even a star?
Rated 21 Sep 2010
47
14th
I prefer the original. This is too glossy and boring and seems even sillier (if that is even possible). I guess I am just old fashioned.
Rated 08 Aug 2010
35
14th
Kraken was decent, rest blew. Incredibly shallow.
Rated 08 Sep 2011
0
2nd
This is the movie I judge bad movies against. thats all u need to know
Rated 06 Jul 2011
70
26th
I rewatch it in 2019 and I must say that I liked it as a movie. The graphics was well done and acting good. But I must also say I think it is very dark. And as I Christian I'm trying to be aware of this. So don't watch it if your very sentimental to dark stuff.
Rated 30 Aug 2015
92
47th
The world of Greek mythology, "Clash of the Titans" kicks into action with a battle between human warriors and a giant scorpion. Then it's off to the races as our hero, Perseus ("Avatar's" Sam Worthington), must vanquish increasingly lethal monsters in a quest to rid humankind of the cruel and mettlesome gods who would rule man for all eternity.
Rated 23 Dec 2010
29
21st
I liked special effects on Ralph Fiennes and yes, producer clearly put a lot of effort on the final mega monster. But the story was kid stuff and Pegasus fight reminded too much of Harry Potter. A man fighting titans is a difficult task to make look good.
Rated 26 Jul 2010
19
13th
Come for the Kraken, stay for the bloodthirsty brown people with indistinguishable "foreign" accents, the lily-white love interest, and the hilarious opportunity to yell "Oh, it's already been BROUGHTEN!" Good for RiffTraxin' and not much else.
Rated 09 Jul 2010
23
8th
The kraken is the only part of the cgi that doesn't look bad and the screenplay is even worse than you could expect from a mindless action flick. I suppose some of the acting is almost decent.
Rated 16 Jan 2011
52
76th
Gode effekter, tåbelig historie, men sådan var den græske mythologi jo. I sammenligning med forgængeren er den et mesterværk. Fed drengefilm for små drenge...
Rated 03 Jun 2011
65
22nd
I'd call it the anti-Avatar but that might suggest Avatar is truly good. A terrible script that takes a simple premises and muddles it up by rewriting Greek mythology to suit Hollywood's baseless need for pointless changes. Characters are willfully stupid and schizophrenic after countless rewrites. The cast and crew, if properly harnessed, probably could have made something halfway decide to eat popcorn to. [Rifftrax lacks the real zingers but overall is an enthusiastic well deserved ripping.]
Rated 19 Apr 2010
82
40th
This had all the elements necessary to be a wondrous remake but someone dropped the ball really bad. If there is one word to describe this Clash it would be rushed: Everything comes into play incredibly fast, it's a movie designed for kiddies with zero attention span, there is no development whatsoever, characters seem to just stand there without an ounce of personality. Why the high rating you ask? The creatures are kick-ass, that's it, too bad there is nothing to sustain them. A real shame.
Rated 04 Apr 2010
65
29th
It was a lot of fun! I pretty much got what I expected and I'm happy with that. The monster designs are awesome, and there are a few really good scenes that made me go yeeeeees! The ending was bullshit, though.
Rated 18 Jul 2010
30
1st
Dire.
Rated 28 Sep 2012
80
57th
I'm not sure why this movie got so many horrible reviews and why this website wanted me to give this movie a 19 out of 100 but I thought it was pretty good. It had some great action and I think Sam Worthington is a great Greek action hero. It's obvious to have Liam Neeson play Zeus as obvious as it is to have Ralph Fiennes play the Dark Lord Volde... I mean Hades. The creatures were awesome especially the Kraken and the Djinn. Gemma Arterton might be a real life Goddess, I'm just sayin'.
Rated 16 Apr 2010
15
0th
Everything about this is very, very crappy.
Rated 15 Sep 2017
77
10th
Some neat looking monsters kind of I guess. Everything in the actual scenes etc screams modern generic action film.
Rated 19 Sep 2010
25
23rd
A fisherman who happens to be a demigod with zero fighting background, somehow defeats a) bunch of building sized spiders b) Medusa (no man could survive her wrath before) c) champion of Hades. (some ex-king strenghtened by Hades) d) kraken (a creature even gods are afraid of) e) Hades himself (underworld god). 2 hours of stupidness. Even the name of the movie does not make sense since we don't get to see any titans. Granted some points for the action and the visuals tho.
Rated 12 Apr 2010
59
26th
The good: CGI, 3D, action scenes were awesome, music was good, some hot chicks The bad: Plot was awful, dialogue was worse, cheese everywhere, ending was crap Overall, I actually quite enjoyed this film, but it is flawed to an exceptional degree.
Rated 18 Mar 2022
12
10th
This is based on a little-known but fun cult classic movie from 1981. Apparently they decided it needed a really bad remake. The rating above is without the 3D. With 3D it was significantly worse.
Rated 25 Apr 2010
41
16th
I had expected so much more of this one.. But it dissapointed me. Poor direction, poor acting except Worthington who actually did a great job. I really hate all those stupid oneliners, and this movie is just full of them. And I didn't like the scorpion-riding thing. At some points it was just too much and I started to look like LotR. The krakken looks hidious btw. Looks like octupus meets Cloverfield.
Rated 10 Dec 2018
5
1st
Clash of the titans but simply no titans. Just take a look at that Hades which is actually my favourite god and tell me that this movie is good.
Rated 20 Jul 2012
17
9th
Misuse of a quality support-cast; the lead and script are rubbish, and the visuals and action sequences aren't much better. *Preview*: #12#, exp-2*, popcorn, hype, story, Gemma.A/7, (cast), R1.
Rated 24 Jan 2012
49
11th
for a movie with such amazing chaRACTERS it still all felt hollow to me. the origonal was amazing check that one out.
Rated 13 Nov 2010
80
37th
where was the pure awesome that the trailer gave off?
Rated 11 Sep 2017
10
4th
This film is a slap in the face to fans of the original.
Rated 01 Sep 2010
68
41st
The revamp of "Titans" from hulk-smash Louis Leterrier features a lot of actors and action in camp glory. The screen is layered with CGI creatures and swordsmen and gods battling to the death. I had some fun with this. In no way is it in the same league as '300' much less 'Lord of the Rings,' but for leftover fantasy epic films, it could have been far more boring and plodding. Sure, some of the CGI is tacky, but the film keeps on fighting, rising to expectations without exceeding them.
Rated 08 Jan 2014
3
14th
Clash Of The Titans sums up the standard of so many so called blockbusters these days. The 3D is none existent and the whole thing is one big marketing ploy. After the success of Avatar in 3D, this film went through a shoddy post production conversion from 2D to 3D. Worthington is his usual dull self and Arterton is annoying. Even the likes of Neeson, Fiennes & Mikkelsen can't salvage things. Some of the set pieces are fun I suppose but otherwise the whole thing is completely superficial.
Rated 29 Jan 2012
7
1st
This movie, for me, summarizes everything that is wrong with mainstream cinema and its audiences. The 3D is non-existent, the acting is practically the same, I really could go on but there is literally no positives in this at all. When taking into account how revolutionary the stop motion was in the original, the overabundance of CGI here is simply insulting, along with everything else. The only enjoyment I found here was Bubo's cameo. One of the worst remakes out there and my most hated.
Rated 13 Mar 2012
50
9th
the action was boring, the acting was boring, pretty much everything about this movie was dumb and boring.
Rated 16 Jul 2013
59
21st
Boring action and effects and a bad remake of the beloved original that manages to save itself from total ruination by constructing a nice world around Sam's dull adventure. When Worthington picked up Bubo and then put him down never to be seen again is when my faith in the movie died.
Rated 06 Dec 2015
67
34th
B-
Rated 03 Dec 2010
70
66th
A shallow but nevertheless entertaining SFX ride
Rated 05 Apr 2010
70
42nd
Don't go into it expecting a thorough retelling of the Perseus myth, because it's not that kind of movie. Modern adaptation of cult classics and influential older movies are often negligible, but I was quite happy with what I saw here, and didn't feel cheated. I mean, yes, they rode on giant scorpions. And they used "black magic". And a Greek demi-God said "bitch". This is really just meant to be a fun movie and that's all. Fantastic design for the Krakken, even though he gets bitch-slapped.
Rated 05 Jun 2010
50
50th
Very, very mediocre.
Rated 12 Jul 2010
62
45th
Yunan mitolojisi temali, turun sevenlerinin keyifli dakikalar gecirecegi bir film. Fazla beklenti olmadan izlenmeli.
Rated 30 Oct 2010
65
32nd
visually great film ruined by terrible acting and script.
Rated 06 Apr 2010
65
20th
I watched this in 3D. Whatever redeeming qualities this film may have had were completely obliterated by the 3D conversion job that reminded me of a pop-up picture book. Speaking of children's books... sometimes it seemed like they cut out the foreground elements with a pair of child's scissors as the background surrounding the main object was often popped out too. One scene that was shot looking up through branches had them at the wrong apparent depth. It was just fail all over the place.

Collections

Loading ...

Similar Titles

Loading ...

Statistics

Loading ...

Trailer

Loading ...