Tenet (2020)
Armed with only one word -- Tenet -- and fighting for the survival of the entire world, the Protagonist journeys through a twilight world of international espionage on a mission that will unfold in something beyond real time. (imdb)
Genres: Sci-fi, Suspense/Thriller, Action
Directed By: Christopher Nolan
Written By: Christopher Nolan
Starring: Michael Caine, Kenneth Branagh, Martin Donovan, Dimple Kapadia, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Robert Pattinson, Clémence Poésy, Denzil Smith, Elizabeth Debicki, John David Washington, Himesh Patel, Anthony Molinari
Loading Products from EbayLoading...
Tenet belongs to 9 collections
1. Time Travel (public: moderated by mpowell - 38 stars)
2. Films available in HD (public: moderated by kubricksucks - 12 stars)
3. Car chase (public - 8 stars)
4. Spy (public: moderated by djross - 6 stars)
5. #1 at the US Box Office (public: moderated by BeeDub - 6 stars)
6. Plane crash (public: moderated by djross - 1 star)
7. Car Crash (public: moderated by Bojangles - 1 star)
8. Big-time Hollywood science fiction (private: djross - 7 stars)
9. jeff_h's films to remember (private: jeff_h)
Browse the full list of collections
| Date | User | Rating | |
| Oct 20 | apostlion | 91 80% |
|
| Oct 19 |  |
DMCrimson | 81 67% |
|
A few clever action scenes but it’s no Inception. Did anyone care about the arm dealer’s wife?
|
|||
| Oct 18 | mg127 | 89 69% |
|
|
I hated the first 45 minutes. The pacing was flat, just scene after scene of various characters explaining the plot. Very little character development. And I couldn't hear the fucking dialogue. Once Protagonist goes through the first turnstile though, I'm in to it. I enjoyed the inversion mechanic - this is what I watch Nolan for. I'm not sure it needed to be that complex, or that difficult to follow, but overall I found it a fun action and time-travel exploration movie.
|
|||
| Oct 18 |  |
Nikelodeon | 82 83% |
| Oct 18 | slaterman2 | 74 46% |
|
| Oct 18 |  |
BizarroIl | 95 91% |
| Oct 18 | sinseer | 70 51% |
|
| Oct 18 |  |
brzowski | 25 9% |
| Oct 17 |  |
ezzarra | 85 75% |
| Oct 17 | emgroetz | 10 92% |
|
| Oct 17 | sebdu59 | 10 10% |
|
| Oct 17 |  |
glumpy_99 | 60 15% |
| Oct 16 |  |
javi151 | 100 98% |
| Oct 16 | joebocop | 30 5% |
|
| Oct 15 |  |
mentosibo | 40 11% |
| Oct 15 | Pfannk | 90 85% |
|
| Oct 14 |  |
FancyClown | 72 46% |
| Oct 14 |  |
vildanden | 70 72% |
| Oct 14 | bktan | 80 78% |
|
|
Sound mixing was terrible. Convoluted and hard to understand. Watched: August 2020
|
|||
| Oct 13 | marvinyco | 90 64% |
|
| Oct 12 | TBRonin | 83 81% |
|
| Oct 12 | jthusky | 56 33% |
|
|
A slightly-above-average blockbuster that thinks it's God's gift to cinema. There are a few individual shots that give away everything the movie's trying to keep secret, which is kinda damning. John David Washington is good but miscast, and the rest of the cast is doing lukewarm Bond archetypes. Robert Pattinson's the only one who manages to shine. Of Nolan's "time" films, this is one of the weakest.
|
|||
| Oct 12 | gyffyg | 65 19% |
|
| Oct 12 | mrstefan | 90 73% |
|
| Oct 12 | smartfred | 70 38% |
|
| Oct 11 |  |
ludvigsen | 50 20% |
| Oct 11 | blucthulhu | 30 4% |
|
| Oct 11 | Chevan | 90 43% |
|
| Oct 10 |  |
Hoodar | 69 48% |
| Oct 10 | alpinnn | 59 20% |
|
| Oct 10 |  |
evrenuyanik | 25 4% |
| Oct 10 | ThoBest | 0 4% |
|
| Oct 10 |  |
PrestoBix | 45 6% |
| Oct 10 |  |
NothingsGood | 25 15% |
|
The fact that the main character is named "The Protagonist" says everything you need to know about Christopher Nolan's view of the role of human beings in his stories. Nolan wants to direct Bond movies so freaking bad.
|
|||
| Oct 09 | cakici | 90 79% |
|
| Oct 08 |  |
heilgoro | 49 18% |
| Oct 08 | WmvWisdom | 68 14% |
|
| Oct 08 | Roger Ebertz | 34 3% |
|
| Oct 07 |  |
amazedemon | 72 84% |
|
Like many Nolan films, Tenet is a concept-heavy film often at the expense of meaningful character development; nevertheless it remains an engaging film throughout. Between exposition and action set pieces, Nolan raises several questions through the visuals only to answer them 5 minutes later. The plot is fairly easy to understand, though the mechanics do make you think; and after a single watch I'm unsure if it's logistically brilliant or masking several plot-holes.
|
|||
| Oct 07 |  |
cankutozturk | 75 49% |
| Oct 07 |  |
darkman | 76 68% |
| Oct 06 | MThorhauge | 90 94% |
|
| Oct 06 | jcarma | 15 71% |
|
| Oct 06 | pigman | 3 0% |
|
| Oct 06 |  |
ceyhunk26 | 75 72% |
| Oct 05 |  |
weirdyoda | 65 15% |
| Oct 05 | jack1994 | 5 17% |
|
| Oct 05 | GieSTheThird | 83 98% |
|
| Oct 05 |  |
jecklund | 61 3% |
| Oct 04 |  |
Revjhou | 90 96% |
| Oct 04 | zgliu | 67 21% |
|
| Oct 03 | jorgeeeeuh | 7 39% |
|
| Oct 03 | overbrookmom | 80 70% |
|
| Oct 03 |  |
orium | 50 9% |
| Oct 03 | Oliii | 86 57% |
|
| Oct 02 | Ali.A | 94 82% |
|
| Oct 02 |  |
ribcage | 74 66% |
|
as Tenet finds a way to fold back on itself, it seems Nolan himself has folded back to those early days of Melies, reminding us of where film came from, that the history can’t be destroyed. Tenet doesn’t hold up to the high standard we’ve set for Nolan. But as a movie’s movie, a popcorner full of passion, smarts, action and subtle fan-nods to the past – hell, this is a blast.
|
|||
| Oct 02 | lynchian | 71 58% |
|
| Oct 02 | Nolan69420 | 90 98% |
|
| Oct 02 |  |
WuGambino | 75 57% |
| Oct 01 |  |
Deadmarsh | 70 64% |
| Oct 01 | Lightning17 | 78 79% |
|
| Oct 01 |  |
romulas80 | 79 62% |
| Sep 30 |  |
teddi | 60 45% |
| Sep 30 |  |
emreco | 80 93% |
| Sep 28 |  |
cagdas | 62 19% |
| Sep 28 |  |
balvares | 50 47% |
| Sep 28 | andrejs | 80 64% |
|
| Sep 27 |  |
letskillrobots | 27 77% |
|
I think where Interstellar and Inception used their time-bent-ness as a side point in favor of an emotional pull, Tenet switched the two. A lot of crazy visuals but it kind of feels like seeing a magic trick: you're amazed at first but once you figure it out it's kind of like... "oh, duh, okay" without being left with a strong connection to the film. I don't fault Nolan for wanting to try something extreme but certainly the accessibility here is at an all-time low for his movies.
|
|||
| Sep 27 |  |
jackinthebox | 70 56% |
| Sep 27 |  |
castanpod | 50 25% |
| Sep 27 | whatisitisee | 80 77% |
|
|
amazing as a parody
|
|||
| Sep 26 |  |
VN1X | 80 75% |
| Sep 26 |  |
ctavares | 70 57% |
| Sep 26 | baseballs | 70 44% |
|
|
Fun action spectacle thing. Writing is deliberately convoluted but it's all just surface level plot stuff so whatever just go with it. It's puzzle box filmmaking with basically nothing in terms of character or theme which are what I normally care about but it was entertaining enough to hold my attention anyway.
|
|||
| Sep 26 | trebag | 80 64% |
|
| Sep 26 |  |
jigglypuff | 10 35% |
| Sep 25 |  |
RTAudience | 76 67% |
| Sep 25 | nuotio | 65 82% |
|
|
A bit conflicted on this: it takes courage to do a big budget film with a concept that will go way over head head for many. Technically this is quality work and there are multiple great action scenes. Script is more like a carefully planned technical plan with little room for emotions. Characters are merely instruments; we don't really know why Debicki's character was so important for the protagonist. For a Finn, it was also a bit weird to see big action scenes set in Estonia.
|
|||
| Sep 24 |  |
emrhbkrts | 83 92% |
| Sep 24 | sergiosp | 80 54% |
|
| Sep 24 |  |
sacmersault | 69 43% |
| Sep 24 |  |
rezasalimi | 84 76% |
| Sep 23 |  |
meryemcik | 50 8% |
| Sep 23 | mrubinos | 75 74% |
|
| Sep 23 | earthlydel | 80 52% |
|
| Sep 23 | Ridirkulous | 82 81% |
|
| Sep 23 |  |
Cooper | 75 55% |
| Sep 23 |  |
DougCollins | 100 93% |
| Sep 23 |  |
Hakan Gül | 78 32% |
| Sep 22 |  |
bhalac | 40 1% |
| Sep 22 |  |
Fäctarn | 79 83% |
| Sep 22 |  |
m_fkocaaslan | 68 22% |
| Sep 22 |  |
Ross | 80 84% |
|
A hard but intriguing first watch. Several more viewings are coming.
|
|||
| Sep 22 | raiders2000 | 92 88% |
|
| Sep 21 |  |
rnest | 6 46% |
| Sep 21 | moviepatrick | 0 0% |
|
| Sep 20 | Henno | 78 76% |
|
| Sep 20 |  |
agirdir | 70 39% |
| Sep 20 | mefeçe | 50 8% |
|
| Sep 20 | Theodore Ab | 70 51% |
|
| Sep 20 | RaggedFlygon | 75 44% |
|
| Sep 20 | random22431 | 51 4% |
|
| Sep 20 | ed ved | 60 17% |
|
| Sep 20 |  |
redflag | 95 81% |
|
Haven't seen Nolan since Inception, never been a huge fan, but this one struck (his handle on the material seems tight even if the ideas exceed his grasp again.) Complex (by the end, exhausting), but sparse (the action especially) with layered images, meanings, and performances (occasionally marred by stilted dialogue and stereotypes, even if intentional.) It will require a re-watch. Something different? Something that signifies? Very Knight of Cups or OK Computer. Adorno's angel.
|
|||
| Sep 20 | okayka | 65 30% |
|
| Sep 19 | ablmf | 86 78% |
|
| Sep 19 |  |
YMS (Adum) | 50 27% |
| Sep 19 | allneonslike | 55 33% |
|
| Sep 19 | rockway | 64 55% |
|
| Sep 19 |  |
nihilanth | 67 32% |
|
First theater experience since Covid and it was kind of disappointment for Nolan, yet it is not a bad movie.
|
|||
| Sep 19 |  |
peyez | 4 27% |
| Sep 18 |  |
igormachete | 83 76% |
|
Lots of fun, the plot's main direction is pretty straightforward and always comprehesible so the movie is still engaging even if you don't follow some local "time tricks" – action sequences are still great
|
|||
| Sep 18 |  |
sonever0805 | 76 42% |
| Sep 18 |  |
stayinalive | 87 50% |
| Sep 18 | SM17 | 85 92% |
|
| Sep 18 | EmiGrecco | 40 0% |
|
| Sep 17 | hairchow | 70 55% |
|
| Sep 17 | Wieland | 80 88% |
|
| Sep 17 |  |
hubies | 77 75% |
| Sep 17 |  |
noiz | 80 84% |
| Sep 16 | shikantaza | 40 19% |
|
| Sep 16 |  |
RichXTuta | 79 58% |
| Sep 16 | judeclapton | 8 64% |
|
| Sep 16 |  |
brkshn | 50 23% |
| Sep 16 | Popcornemil | 55 20% |
|
| Sep 16 | elhenzo | 80 69% |
|
| Sep 16 | nevamovie | 80 83% |
|
| Sep 16 | Naynay | 70 25% |
|
| Sep 16 | Jackal6388 | 85 53% |
|
| Sep 15 | 5Z5qjRCfM2 | 65 72% |
|
| Sep 15 |  |
ulashbulut | 85 89% |
| Sep 15 |  |
lockstock | 80 86% |
| Sep 15 |  |
Valdac | 90 80% |
| Sep 14 | atherif | 70 46% |
|
| Sep 14 | Halo | 77 70% |
|
| Sep 14 |  |
canadianor | 60 35% |
| Sep 14 |  |
Tavington | 1 11% |
|
Mess of a 1000 cuts and poor character development. There are so many movies that use time travel way, way better. Action scenes are nice to see but this is only redeeming thing. And Nolan can make movies more than just a set of action clips.
|
|||
| Sep 14 |  |
nikolajrh | 75 84% |
| Sep 14 |  |
joeroxy | 80 90% |
| Sep 14 |  |
Marusu | 90 90% |
| Sep 14 | worleyjamers | 68 55% |
|
| Sep 14 |  |
Orfonso | 83 81% |
| Sep 13 | julescoco | 78 16% |
|
|
very mind-fuck kind of movie, i had to concentrate to really understand what was going which is what made this movie so good. It kept my attention at all times. Sometimes the pacing was a little too quick (felt rushed) for me to understand but definitely a good watch. The characters are underdeveloped but not really important in the long run. overall not as bad as people made it seem like as long as you pay attention and stick with it, it will make sense in the end.
|
|||
| Sep 13 | henrisepp | 70 78% |
|
| Sep 13 |  |
drou7 | 86 88% |
| Sep 13 | michaelducks | 50 49% |
|
| Sep 13 | CalSmillie | 79 77% |
|
| Sep 13 |  |
uysalherif | 60 42% |
| Sep 13 | slatenf | 65 20% |
|
| Sep 13 | adwilson | 45 23% |
|
| Sep 13 |  |
CoinQuatro | 55 42% |
| Sep 13 |  |
natebarrios | 60 29% |
|
you can tell Christopher Nolan had a week of non-stop Bond movies and Modern Warfare on the Xbox with his boys and he was just like 'yooo!!!!!! I fuckin' got something!
|
|||
| Sep 13 |  |
Fred101 | 2 17% |
| Sep 13 | Wyzt | 85 85% |
|
| Sep 13 |  |
plynthe | 76 12% |
| Sep 13 | marcos-s | 7 37% |
|
| Sep 13 |  |
PLYGNfiction | 75 75% |
| Sep 12 |  |
Roshambo | 60 51% |
| Sep 12 |  |
Darren | 50 23% |
|
Was one of the few people I knew who actually liked Dunkirk dame can not be said about this one. Nolan still has not figured out how to shoot an action sequence it’s insane. I do quite enjoy Pattinson tho and definitely not a movie that’s all that confusing as they tell you exactly what happened 50 times over during the course of the flick
|
|||
| Sep 12 |  |
jsopanen | 72 96% |
| Sep 12 |  |
apataca | 55 20% |
| Sep 12 | blackendblue | 25 5% |
|
| Sep 12 | SelamS | 8 63% |
|
| Sep 12 |  |
abasakucan | 65 34% |
| Sep 11 |  |
Ofterdingen | 66 67% |
|
Christopher Nolan is really good at making heavy vehicles, driving next to each other, look great.
|
|||
| Sep 11 | Grinner | 70 32% |
|
| Sep 11 |  |
Vandelay1 | 64 64% |
|
good movie
|
|||
| Sep 11 |  |
epaseila | 70 71% |
| Sep 11 |  |
Duder | 60 40% |
|
* Yeah, Nolan does not break his trend of style over matter. Sadly, not much is happening in his cinema after Inception, lots of mechanic perfection but not much else. Rises, Dunkirk, Interstellar are all technically amazing, but extremely mediocre films.. One misses The Prestige a lot. This one felt like it was made for the middle and ending action scenes alone, which were technically amazing. But just that.
|
|||
| Sep 11 |  |
Sachaz | 39 21% |
| Sep 10 | davesv | 91 93% |
|
| Sep 10 |  |
Thomassejer | 45 16% |
| Sep 10 |  |
Hofschneider | 70 31% |
|
I care so little about this, I'm not even angry. Also, was the opera opening the worst setpiece in Nolan's body of work?
|
|||
| Sep 10 | lrifkin | 29 23% |
|
| Sep 10 | Hannes | 70 39% |
|
| Sep 10 | jdub7 | 76 52% |
|
| Sep 10 | Hoem | 30 2% |
|
| Sep 10 |  |
kaan26 | 67 61% |
| Sep 10 |  |
ArthurFleck | 74 47% |
| Sep 09 |  |
iconogassed | 50 26% |
|
Less big loud Robbe-Grillet than big loud dour DUCK AMUCK: what if I do _this_ to a fight scene? how about _this_ to a car chase? a full-scale firefight? Still exciting in the same ways? New ones? Are you, our "fresh-faced protagonist", able to absorb, or forget, or disregard, the compound exposition, "not to think about it, but feel it"? Problem is, Kenneth Branagh as a Russian mobster are six of the most boring words in existence. A Russian mobster as Kenneth Branagh, though...
|
|||
| Sep 09 | MRacle | 59 19% |
|
| Sep 09 | slechepar | 74 46% |
|
| Sep 09 | regbouch | 55 27% |
|
| Sep 09 |  |
anaskvit | 65 17% |
| Sep 09 | Nathers7 | 4 11% |
|
| Sep 09 | dgrissen | 88 77% |
|
| Sep 09 | rospo | 60 41% |
|
| Sep 09 | f_ranzen | 52 32% |
|
| Sep 09 |  |
Stripy | 68 26% |
| Sep 09 |  |
voneverec | 75 59% |
| Sep 09 |  |
joel-w-m | 75 63% |
|
Couldn't hear half the dialogue and only understood half of the rest, but it's a testament to Nolan's ambitious and undeniably exciting brand of filmmaking that I was on the edge of my seat throughout regardless: the espionage plot and sci-fi concept are both confusing but compelling, the action is brilliant, the technical aspects top notch. It's a shame the only emotion is found in yet another Russian villain and a simply modernized damsel-in-distress (Debicki's turn remains excellent though).
|
|||
| Sep 08 |  |
Saeed_bdr | 20 6% |
| Sep 08 | Insti | 85 84% |
|
| Sep 08 |  |
Corbad | 75 65% |
|
There is spectacle and there is reward, but the frenetic pace (forced by a completely unnecessary first act) is not helped by incomprehensible writing; there is never time for a satisfying “Aha!” moment before the next enigma crashes onto screen. Throw in a trademark lack of character and a woman without agency (Debicki almost makes it work) and the spectacle is really all that’s left to enjoy during the experience itself, and I don’t think it was enough. Messy.
|
|||
| Sep 08 | etwim | 58 15% |
|
| Sep 08 |  |
Pats_London | 45 5% |
| Sep 08 |  |
rlukaku | 75 70% |
| Sep 08 | Aventinus | 72 85% |
|
| Sep 08 | TheStraub | 76 73% |
|
| Sep 08 | sellis | 58 25% |
|
|
Nolan hasn’t written a definable character/performance since Heath Ledger’s Joker. What awful dialogue here. I bought the ticket for the images, and those did not disappoint. For a movie whose every line of dialogue is a bland effort to explain to us what’s going on, I had no idea what was going on by the end. Inception made sense and was over-explained; I honestly prefer not understanding
|
|||
| Sep 07 | sillytrain | 99 90% |
|
| Sep 07 | Slowjoe | 65 51% |
|
| Sep 07 | NewPhilip | 65 54% |
|
| Sep 07 |  |
wgwolford | 60 31% |
| Sep 07 |  |
drawingboard | 80 78% |
| Sep 07 |  |
Marielou | 69 16% |
| Sep 07 | rupke | 75 22% |
|
| Sep 07 | AndersF | 70 63% |
|
| Sep 07 |  |
lupinesse | 81 44% |
| Sep 07 | goldfinger | 70 58% |
|
| Sep 07 | TheMooseman | 34 38% |
|
| Sep 07 | Toy-G | 84 57% |
|
| Sep 07 |  |
SantaClaus | 66 57% |
| Sep 07 | Boak | 75 51% |
|
| Sep 07 | willmylrea | 63 37% |
|
| Sep 07 |  |
fenixdown | 72 43% |
| Sep 07 |  |
Seethruskin | 3 27% |
|
You know there’s some people in this movie offscreen that were taking shits and when time gets inverted it goes back up their ass.
|
|||
| Sep 07 | jentze | 76 40% |
|
| Sep 07 | munferitysm | 71 9% |
|
| Sep 07 |  |
jalanb | 63 21% |
|
I agree with Adam Kempenaar of Filmspotting: "Tenet is what happens when Nolan forgets Borden's wisdom [from The Prestige]. He's so obsessed with how impressive his 'secret' is that the trick he uses it for is nothing. " I was streaming it, so I rewatched the 2nd half, then the 1st half, and still missed the point. Saw a lot of guns on mantlepieces in the first act, but not enough maguffins to care about. Should not be seen on a phone, but in A Film School.
|
|||
| Sep 07 | Noel74 | 74 22% |
|
| Sep 07 |  |
Mr. Nobody | 14 74% |
| Sep 06 |  |
FrederikA | 70 68% |
|
In essence a fairly ordinary spy action film, with several great set-pieces (one car chase in particular) spread out through a familiar tale. As for the time traveling: the word “Entropy” does a lot of the heavy lifting explaining it (which I’m fine with) and as a novel gimmick it works wonderfully, but the “Schrödinger’s cat” logic of it, creates a deterministic undercurrent to the story, which kind of goes against the whole premise of actively trying to change the past... right?
|
|||
| Sep 06 |  |
lofisofi | 51 50% |
|
i think the less nolan tries to make sense, the better he actually is
|
|||
| Sep 06 |  |
sofad | 90 97% |
|
Öncelikle çok klas, şık, gösterişli bir film. Sanatsal ve teknik açıdan büyüleyici. Hikaye anlamında da klasik edebiyat eserlerinde bu denli büyük bir çatışma,bu denli büyük hikaye gördüm ben, sinemada nadir rastlanan cinsten. Büyük olaylar, büyük karakterler çarpışıyor. Felsefi açıdan çok katmanlı, duygusal boyutu ise etkileyici bir biçimde filmin sonlarında kendini gösteriyor. Hayata, dünyaya, varlıklara karşı çok farklı bir perspektif mevcut.
|
|||
| Sep 06 | kevinwriter | 70 54% |
|
| Sep 06 | mokentin | 90 87% |
|
| Sep 06 |  |
kerem10 | 55 16% |
| Sep 06 | SlumberyBox | 98 98% |
|
| Sep 06 |  |
djmouka | 85 87% |
| Sep 06 |  |
wokelstein | 73 55% |
| Sep 06 | usefu11diot | 20 6% |
|
| Sep 06 |  |
Architeutis | 70 53% |
| Sep 06 |  |
Jaifman | 80 64% |
| Sep 06 | koftepatates | 80 56% |
|
| Sep 06 |  |
Cowman | 80 88% |
|
Amazing action and soundtrack. Beautifully choreographed, mind-boggling fight scenes accompanied by an intense soundtrack. Too much exposition and explanation is annoying and often unintentionally funny. Keep supernatural events mysterious next time. The whole subplot with the arm's dealer's wife was lost on me. Why would we care about this kind of person?
|
|||
| Sep 06 |  |
kNwsVXgzm | 6 45% |
| Sep 06 | tenfalltoo | 80 72% |
|
| Sep 06 | Alucard979 | 82 72% |
|
| Sep 06 |  |
siphus007 | 71 32% |
|
Certainly ambitious and admirable, but on a first watch comes across jarring, convoluted, and filled with exposition.
|
|||
| Sep 06 |  |
HiResDes | 76 63% |
|
It's very much like a spiritual successor to Inception. You'll love it if you can deal with even more convoluted plot devices. Nolan definitely has a found a niche relying on confusion to create mystery. He acknowledges his plot holes and tries to subvert them by posing them as philosophical conundrums. None of the central characters in Tenet are given much background or context. Their motivations come to fruition at the denouement and thus seem rather tacked on and emotionally disingenuous.
|
|||
| Sep 05 |  |
meltem | 70 54% |
| Sep 05 | The_Watch | 80 68% |
|
| Sep 05 |  |
Gideon | 2 59% |
|
So the trick Nolan likes to pulll more and more is to make a mediocre film but drowned in 'NNNGGHUUUUUHHHH!!!!!' sound all of the goddamn time. That shit doesn't make your film more impressive, just more annoying. Nolan's worst.
|
|||
| Sep 05 | Greg_Toyle34 | 83 40% |
|
| Sep 05 |  |
lebnof | 75 84% |
| Sep 05 | jpn | 3 35% |
|
| Sep 05 | Excal | 75 62% |
|
| Sep 05 |  |
gigafan | 84 73% |
Displaying 1 to 250 of 505 total ratings: Prev | Next
| Average Percentile 54.22% from 505 Ratings |  |
